Over the last two decades increasing attention has been given to lay views of health and illness. An important area within this research is the views that different socioeconomic groups hold on the causes of illness. Generally it is concluded that people of lower socioeconomic status are more likely than those of more affluent standing to talk about the causes of illness in lifestyle rather than structural terms that involve overt connections with the material impact of social inequality. We draw on 20 semi-structured interviews with New Zealanders of lower socioeconomic status to explore the ways various causes are assigned to illness. Our participants voice multiple and often contradictory views when assigning cause, and include references to structural issues in addition to lifestyle risk factors and medical ideas about biological functioning and disease. There appears to be a range of sociocultural explanations available for these people to draw on when making sense of illness. We argue that the prevalence of structural explanations may be due, in part, to cultural shifts and increased critical reaction to various social reforms. Our findings support the idea that people’s views are socially constructed to account for the complexities of health and illness as part of everyday life.
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. London: Sage.
2.
Billig, M. (1997). Discursive, rhetorical, and ideological messages. In C. McGarty & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 37–53). Oxford: Blackwell.
3.
Blaxter, M. (1990). Health and lifestyles. London: Routledge.
4.
Blaxter, M. (1993). Why do the victims blame themselves? In A. Radley (Ed.), Worlds of illness: Biographical and cultural perspectives on health and disease (pp. 124–142). London: Routledge.
5.
Blaxter, M. (1997). Whose fault is it? People’s own conceptions of the reasons for health inequalities. Social Science and Medicine, 44, 747–756.
6.
Blaxter, M., & Paterson, E. (1982). Mothers and daughters. London: Heinemann.
7.
Bury, M. (1997). Health and illness in a changing society. New York: Routledge.
8.
Calnan, M. (1987). Health and illness: The lay perspective. London: Tavistock.
9.
Chamberlain, K. (1997). Socio-economic health differentials: From structure to experience. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 399–411.
10.
Cheyne, C., O’Brien, M., & Belgrave, M. (1997). Social policy in Aotearoa New Zealand: A critical introduction. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
11.
Cornwell, J. (1984). Hard-earned lives: Accounts of health and illness from East London. London: Tavistock.
12.
Crawford, R. (1977). You are dangerous to your health: The ideology and politics of victim blaming. International Journal of Health Services, 7, 663–680.
13.
Crawford, R. (1980). Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services, 19, 365–388.
14.
Crawford, R. (1984). A cultural account of ‘health’: control, release and the social body. In J. B. Mc-Kinlay (Ed.), Issues in the political economy of health care (pp. 60–103). London: Tavistock.
15.
Elstad, J. I. (1998). The psycho-social perspective on social inequalities in health. In M. Bartley, D. Blane, & G. Smith (Eds.), The sociology of health inequalities (pp. 41–58). Oxford: Blackwell.
16.
Engel, G. L. (1977). The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196,129–136.
17.
Farr, R. M. (1995). Representations of health, illness and handicap in the mass media of communication: A theoretical overview. In I. Markova & R. M. Farr (Eds.), Representations of health, illness and handicap (pp. 3–30). Singapore: Harwood Academic.
18.
Farr, R. M., & Markova, I. (1995). Professional and lay representations of health, illness and handicap: A theoretical overview. In I. Markova & R. M. Farr (Eds.), Representations of health, illness and handicap (pp. 93–110). Singapore: Harwood Academic.
19.
Featherstone, M. (1987). Leisure, symbolic power and the life course. In J. Horne, D. Jary, & A. Tomlinson (Eds.), Sports, leisure and social relations(pp. 113–138). London: Routledge.
20.
Glassner, B. (1989). Fitness and the postmodern self. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour, 30, 180–191.
21.
Greco, M. (1993). Psychosomatic subjects and the ‘duty to be well’: Personal agency within medical rationality. Economy and Society, 22, 357–372.
22.
Herzlich, C. (1973). Health and illness. London: Academic Press.
23.
Herzlich, C., & Pierret, J. (1987). Illness and self in society. (E. Forster, Trans.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
Hodgetts, D. J., & Chamberlain, K. (1999). Medicalization and the depiction of lay people in television health documentary. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 3, 319–335.
25.
Hodgetts, D. J., Chamberlain, K., & Cullen, A. M. (1999). The role of television health coverage in the construction of people’s views on contemporary health concerns. Bulletin of the New Zealand Psychological Society, 96, 37–40.
26.
Pierret, J. (1993). Constructing discourses about health and their social determinants. In A. Radley (Ed.), Worlds of illness: Biographical and cultural perspectives on health and disease (pp. 9–26). London: Routledge.
27.
Pill, R., & Stott, N. (1982). Concepts of illness causation and responsibility: Some preliminary data from a sample of working-class women. Social Science and Medicine, 16, 43–52.
28.
Pill, R., & Stott, N. (1985). Choice or chance: Further evidence on ideas of illness and responsibility for health. Social Science and Medicine, 20, 981–991.
29.
Pollock, K. (1993). Attitude of mind as a means of resisting illness. In A. Radley (Ed.), Worlds of illness: Biographical and cultural perspectives on health and disease(pp. 49–70). London: Routledge.
30.
Popay, J., & Williams, G. (1996). Public health research and lay knowledge. Social Science and Medicine, 42, 759–768.
31.
Popay, J., Williams, G., Thomas, C., & Gatrell, A. (1998). Theorising inequalities in health: The place of lay knowledge. In M. Bartley, D. Blane, & G. Smith (Eds.), The sociology of health inequalities(pp. 59–83). Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
Radley, A. (1994). Making sense of illness: The social psychology of health and disease. London: Sage.
33.
Radley, A. (1996). The critical moment: time, information and medical expertise in the experience of patients receiving coronary bypass surgery. In S. J. Williams & M. Calnan (Eds.), Modern medicine: Lay perspectives and experiences (pp. 118–138). London: UCL Press.
34.
Radley, A. (1999). Social realms and the qualities of illness experience. In M. Murray & K. Chamberlain (Eds.), Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods (pp. 16–30). London: Sage.
35.
Radley, A., & Billig, M. (1996). Accounts of health and illness: Dilemmas and representations. Sociology of Health and Illness, 18, 220–240.
36.
Saltonstall, R. (1993). Healthy bodies, social bodies: Men’s and women’s concepts and practices of health in everyday life. Social Science and Medicine, 36,7–14.
37.
Stainton Rogers, W. (1991). Explaining health and illness: An exploration of diversity. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
38.
Wilkinson, R. (1996). Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge.
39.
Williams, R. (1990). A Protestant legacy: Attitudes to death and illness among older Aberdonians. Oxford: Clarendon.
40.
Williams, S. J., & Calnan, M. (1996). Modern medicine and the lay populace: Theoretical perspectives and methodological issues. In S. J. Williams & M. Calnan (Eds.), Modern medicine: Lay perspectives and experiences (pp. 2–25). London: UCL Press.
