Cross-Cultural Differences in Territoriality: Interaction Distances of Native Japanese,Hawaii Japanese,and American Caucasians

Abstract

Distance between dyads, using an adaption of Kuethe's (1962) Felt Figure technique, was investigated as a function of relationship, culture, sex, and conversational content. Relationship was the most powerful determinant of distance. Culture was also significant, but sex and content were not. As predicted, Native Japanese had greater distances than either Hawaii Japanese or American Caucasians. However, no differences were found between Hawaii Japanese and American Caucasians, which was contrary to anticipated results. Sex differences among Native Japanese and American Caucasians were not significant. The hypothesis of greater distances for Hawaii Japanese males was not supported. Previous studies had indicated a more rapid rate of acculturation for Hawaii Japanese females, but on the dimension of interaction distance sex was not a significant determinant for the Hawaii Japanese group.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ardrey, R. The territorial imperative. New York: Atheneum, 1966.

Arkoff, A. , Meredith, G. , & Dong, J. Attitudes of Japanese-Americans and Caucasian-American students toward marriage roles. Journal of Social Psychology, 1963, 59, 11-15.

Arkoff, A. , Meredith, G. , & Iwahara, S. Dominance-deference patterning in Motherland-Japanese, Japanese-American and Caucasian-American students. Journal of Social Psychology, 1962, 58, 61-66.

Arkoff, A. , Meredith, G. , & Iwahara, S. Male dominant and equalitarian attitudes in Japanese, Japanese-American and Caucasian-American students. Journal of Social Psychology, 1964, 64, 225-229.

Carpenter, C. R. Territoriality: A review of concepts and problems, in A. Roe , & G. Simpson , (Eds.)., Behavior and Evolution, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.

Caudill, W. Japanese-American personality and acculturation . Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1952, 45, 3-103.

Dent, H. E. , Gaston, J. E. , & Dole, A. A. Hospitalization as a component in social distance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, California, September 1964.

Doi, L. T. Amae - A key concept for understanding Japanese personality structure . Psychologia, 1962, 5, 1-7.

Fisher, Rhoda Lee . Social schema of normal and disturbed school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967, 58 (2), 88-92.

10.

Guilford, J. P. Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1965.

11.

Hall, E. T. The silent language. New York: Doubleday, 1959.

12.

Kuethe, L. Social schemas . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962, 64, 31-38.

13.

Kuethe, L. Pervasive influence of social schemata . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1964, 68 (3), 248-254.

14.

Lindquist, E. F. Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1953.

15.

Little, K. B. Personal space . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1965, 1, 237-247.

16.

Little, K. B. Cultural variations in social schemata . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968, 10 (1), 1-7.

17.

Meredith, G. M. Amae and acculturation among Japanese-American college students in Hawaii . Journal of Social Psychology, 1966, 70, 171-180.

18.

Scheflen, A. E. Human communication: behavioral programs and their integration in interaction . Behavioral Science, 1968, 13, 44-55.

19.

Watzlawick, P. , Beavin, Janet , & Jackson, D. D. Pragmatics of human communication: a study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1967.