Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2024-10
Effectiveness of technology-assisted vs face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in children and young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) has been proven to be effective for anxiety and depression in children and young people (CYP). Over the past 20 years there have been several attempts at delivering CBT through apps, online software, videogames, but also with a therapist via phone or videoconferencing platforms, with promising results for the “technology-assisted” versions. However, most research, have compared online CBT to waiting lists, and not many studies looked at the effectiveness of face-to-face (f2f) CBT versus technology-assisted CBT. Methods: Adopting the PRISMA guidelines, we evaluated 1849 citations and identified 10 eligible studies. Studies were identified through the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus. Results: Ten studies met our inclusion criteria. The studies included a variety of technology-assisted forms of CBT, including videoconferencing and online CBT. Of these, seven looked at the effectiveness of technology-assisted CBT for anxiety in CYP, and seven looked at depression. The meta-analyses had low heterogeneity and showed that technology-assisted CBT was non-inferior to f2f CBT for anxiety and depression in CYP (d = 0.06 and 0.12 respectively). Conclusions: Technology-assisted CBT may be a valid alternative for the treatment of anxiety and depression in CYP. Future studies should consider what specific delivery modalities are most cost-effective.
Plain Language Summary
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) has been proven to be effective for anxiety and depression in children and young people (CYP). Over the past 20 years there have been several attempts at delivering CBT through apps, online software, videogames, but also with a therapist via phone or videoconferencing platforms, with promising results for the “technology-assisted” versions. However, most research, have compared online CBT to waiting lists, and not many studies looked at the effectiveness of face-to-face (f2f) CBT vs technology-assisted CBT. Adopting the PRISMA guidelines, we evaluated 1849 citations and identified 10 eligible studies. Studies were identified through Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus. Ten studies met our inclusion criteria. The studies included a variety of technology-assisted forms of CBT, including videoconferencing and online CBT. Of these, seven looked at the effectiveness of technology-assisted CBT for anxiety in CYP, and seven looked at depression. The meta-analyses had low heterogeneity and showed that technology-assisted CBT was non-inferior to f2f CBT for anxiety and depression in CYP. Technology-assisted CBT is a valid alternative for the treatment of anxiety and depression in CYP. Future studies should consider what specific delivery modalities are most cost-effective.
AboujaoudeE.SalameW. (2016). Technology at the service of pediatric mental health: Review and assessment. The Journal of Pediatrics, 171, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.12.009
AnderssonG.CuijpersP.CarlbringP.RiperH.HedmanE. (2014). Guided internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 13(3), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20151
4.
AspvallK.AnderssonE.MelinK.NorlinL.ErikssonV.VigerlandS.JolstedtM.Silverberg-MörseM.WallinL.SampaioF.FeldmanI.BottaiM.LenhardF.Mataix-ColsD.SerlachiusE. (2021). Effect of an internet-delivered stepped-care program vs in-person cognitive behavioral therapy on obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 325(18), 1863–1873. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.3839
5.
Babiano-EspinosaL.WoltersL. H.WeidleB.op de BeekV.PedersenS. A.ComptonS.SkokauskasN. (2019). Acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy of internet cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 284. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1166-6
BevilacquaL.Fox-SmithL.LewinsA.JethaP.SideriA.BartonG.Meiser-StedmanR.BeazleyP.BeazleyP. (2023). Impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of children and young people: An umbrella review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 77(11), 704–709. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-220259
9.
CarlbringP.AnderssonG.CuijpersP.RiperH.Hedman-LagerlöfE. (2018). Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 47(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115
10.
Cartwright-HattonS.RobertsC.ChitsabesanP.FothergillC.HarringtonR. (2004). Systematic review of the efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapies for childhood and adolescent anxiety disorders. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(Pt 4), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144665042388928
11.
ChamblessD. L.HollonS. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.66.1.7
12.
CuijpersP.van StratenA.BohlmeijerE.HollonS.AnderssonG. (2010). The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression are overestimated: A meta-analysis of study quality and effect size. Psychological Medicine, 40(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291709006114
13.
CunninghamJ. A.KypriK.McCambridgeJ. (2013). Exploratory randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a waiting list control design. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 150–157. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-150
14.
DonkerT.CorneliszI.Van KlaverenC.Van StratenA.CarlbringP.CuijpersP.Van GelderJ.-L. (2019). Effectiveness of self-guided app-based virtual reality cognitive behavior therapy for acrophobia: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 76(7), 682–690. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0219
15.
EbertD. D.ZarskiA.-C.ChristensenH.StikkelbroekY.CuijpersP.BerkingM.RiperH. (2015). Internet and computer-based cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety and depression in youth: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled outcome trials. PLoS One, 10(3), Article e0119895. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119895
GoodmanW.PriceL.RasmussenS.RiddleM.RapoportJ. (1991). Children’s Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale (CY-BOCS) (Vol. 29, pp. 31–51). Clinical Neuroscience Unit.
18.
HartT.FannJ. R.NovackT. A. (2008). The dilemma of the control condition in experience-based cognitive and behavioural treatment research. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010601082359
19.
HigginsJ. P.ThomasJ.ChandlerJ.CumpstonM.LiT.PageM. J.WelchV. A. (2019). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons.
20.
HiginbothamM. K.Emmert-AronsonB.BungeE. L. (2020). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of behavioral intervention technologies and face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for youth with depression. Journal of technology in behavioral science, 5(4), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-020-00139-6
21.
HowesS. T.GoreyK. M.CharronC. M. (2021). Relative effectiveness of online cognitive behavioural therapy with anxious or depressed young people: Rapid review and meta-analysis. Australian Social Work, 76(4), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407x.2021.2001832
22.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2000). Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00156
23.
JamesA. C.ReardonT.SolerA.JamesG.CreswellC. (2020). Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 11(11), CD013162. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013162.pub2
24.
KhannaM. S.KendallP. C. (2010). Computer-assisted cognitive behavioral therapy for child anxiety: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(5), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019739
25.
KindermanP.HaganP.KingS.BowmanJ.ChahalJ.GanL.McKnightR.WaldonC.SmithM.GilbertsonJ.TaiS. (2016). The feasibility and effectiveness of Catch It, an innovative CBT smartphone app. BJPsych Open, 2(3), 204–209. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.002436
26.
LovibondP. F.LovibondS. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the Beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u
27.
MartínezV.RojasG.MartínezP.GaeteJ.ZitkoP.VöhringerP. A.ArayaR. (2019). Computer-assisted cognitive-behavioral therapy to treat adolescents with depression in primary health care centers in Santiago, Chile: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00552
28.
MatsumotoK.HamataniS.ShimizuE. (2021). Effectiveness of videoconference-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with psychiatric disorders: Systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(12), Article e31293. https://doi.org/10.2196/31293
29.
MerryS. N.StasiakK.ShepherdM.FramptonC.FlemingT.LucassenM. F. (2012). The effectiveness of SPARX, a computerised self help intervention for adolescents seeking help for depression: Randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ, 344(apr18 3), Article e2598. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e2598
30.
NelsonE.-L.BarnardM.CainS. (2003). Treating childhood depression over videoconferencing. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health: The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 9(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1089/153056203763317648
31.
NICE. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2014). Overview | Anxiety disorders | Guidance | NICE. Retrieved December 16, 2023, from NICE Guidance website:https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs53
32.
NICE. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2019). Overview | Depression in children and young people: identification and management| Guidance | NICE. Retrieved December 14, 2023, from NICE Guidance website:https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng134
33.
OudM.De WinterL.Vermeulen-SmitE.BoddenD.NautaM.StoneL.Van Den HeuvelM.TaherR. A.De GraafI.KendallT.EngelsR.StikkelbroekY. (2019). Effectiveness of CBT for children and adolescents with depression: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. European Psychiatry: The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 57(57), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.12.008
34.
PageM. J.McKenzieJ. E.BossuytP. M.BoutronI.HoffmannT. C.MulrowC. D.ShamseerL.TetzlaffJ. M.AklE. A.BrennanS. E.ChouR.GlanvilleJ.GrimshawJ. M.HróbjartssonA.LaluM. M.LiT.LoderE. W.Mayo-WilsonE.McDonaldS.MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Revista Espanola de Cardiologia, 74(9), 790–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010
35.
PennantM. E.LoucasC. E.WhittingtonC.CreswellC.FonagyP.FuggleP.KelvinR.NaqviS.StocktonS.KendallT.Expert Advisory Group. (2015). Computerised therapies for anxiety and depression in children and young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 67(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.01.009
36.
PoppelaarsM.TakY. R.Lichtwarck-AschoffA.EngelsR. C.LobelA.MerryS. N.LucassenM. F.GranicI. (2016). A randomized controlled trial comparing two cognitive-behavioral programs for adolescent girls with subclinical depression: A school-based program (Op Volle Kracht) and a computerized program (SPARX). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 80, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.03.005
37.
ReynoldsW. M. (2004). Reynolds adolescent depression scale. In HilsenrothM. J.SegalD. L. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 224–236). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
38.
SchenkerN.GentlemanJ. F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55(3), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001317097960
39.
SchuurmansA. A.NijhofK. S.VermaesI. P.EngelsR. C.GranicI. (2015). A pilot study evaluating “Dojo,” a videogame intervention for youths with externalizing and anxiety problems. Games for Health Journal, 4(5), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2014.0138
SethiS.CampbellA. J.EllisL. A. (2010). The use of computerized self-help packages to treat adolescent depression and anxiety. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 28(3), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2010.508317
42.
SilvermanW. K.AlbanoA. M. (1996). Anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV: Child version. Oxford University Press.
43.
SmithP.ScottR.EshkevariE.JattaF.LeighE.HarrisV.RobinsonA.AbelesP.ProudfootJ.VerduynC.YuleW. (2015). Computerised CBT for depressed adolescents: Randomised controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 73, 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.009
44.
SpenceS. H.HolmesJ. M.MarchS.LippO. V. (2006). The feasibility and outcome of clinic plus internet delivery of cognitive-behavior therapy for childhood anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 614–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.614
45.
SpenceJ.TitovN.DearB. F.JohnstonL.SolleyK.LorianC.WoottonB.ZouJ.SchwenkeG. (2011). Randomized controlled trial of Internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 28(7), 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20835
46.
SpielbergerC. D.EdwardsC. D.MontouriJ.LusheneR. (1973). State-trait anxiety inventory for children. APA PsycTests.
47.
SportelB. E.de HulluE.de JongP. J.NautaM. H. (2013). Cognitive bias modification versus CBT in reducing adolescent social anxiety: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 8(5), Article e64355. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064355
48.
SteelK.CoxD.GarryH. (2011). Therapeutic videoconferencing interventions for the treatment of long-term conditions. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 17(3), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2010.100318
49.
TurnerC. M.Mataix-ColsD.LovellK.KrebsG.LangK.ByfordS.HeymanI. (2014). Telephone cognitive-behavioral therapy for adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(12), 1298–1307.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2014.09.012
50.
VibhakarV.AllenL. R.GeeB.Meiser-StedmanR. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of depression in children and adolescents after exposure to trauma. Journal of Affective Disorders, 255, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.005
51.
VigerlandS.LenhardF.BonnertM.LalouniM.HedmanE.AhlenJ.OlénO.SerlachiusE.LjótssonB. (2016). Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 50, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.09.005
52.
WickershamA.BarackT.CrossL.DownsJ. (2022). Computerized cognitive behavioral therapy for treatment of depression and anxiety in adolescents: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(4), e29842. https://doi.org/10.2196/29842
53.
WozneyL.HuguetA.BennettK.RadomskiA. D.HartlingL.DysonM.McGrathP. J.NewtonA. S. (2017). How do eHealth programs for adolescents with depression work? A realist review of persuasive system design components in internet-based psychological therapies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(8), e266. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7573
54.
ZanganiC.OstinelliE. G.SmithK. A.HongJ. S.MacdonaldO.ReenG.ReidK.VincentC.Syed SheriffR.HarrisonP. J.HawtonK.PitmanA.BaleR.FazelS.GeddesJ. R.CiprianiA. (2022). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global delivery of mental health services and telemental health: Systematic review. JMIR Mental Health, 9(8), Article e38600. https://doi.org/10.2196/38600
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
