Is consent causing confusion for clinicians? A survey of child and adolescent Mental health professional’s confidence in using Parental Consent,Gillick Competence and the Mental Capacity Act

Abstract

All professionals engaged in clinical work should be competent to assess consent for the interventions they provide. This study assesses CAMHS clinicians confidence and knowledge in the various forms of consent and the number of minors admitted to mental health units in England under parental consent alone.

An online questionnaire using vignettes of possible scenarios was sent to child and adolescent mental health practitioners in Tees Esk and Wear Valleys Trust. A freedom of information request was used to determine the number of young people admitted through parental consent.

Thirteen of the 20 trusts contacted had no knowledge of the number of young people admitted under parental consent. A total of 93 participants completed the survey. Out of six vignettes, there were two where the majority of responses were discordant with current legal advice. Both of these vignettes considered the use of parental consent for admission to a mental health unit.

This study provides further evidence to indicate that the current consent processes in CAMHS causes confusion for clinicians. There continues to be very few safeguards for children admitted under parental consent, with most trusts in England and Wales having no centralised knowledge of whether this is occurring and the numbers involved if it is.

Keywords

Capacity mental health act adolescent child Gillick consent survey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2000/4/contents

Alderson

(1992). In the genes or in the stars? Children’s competence to consent. Journal of Medical Ethics, 18(3), 119–124.

Akerele

(2014). Adolescent decision-making and the zone of parental control: A missed opportunity for legislative change. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 20(2), 144–150.

Bowers

Dubicka

(2010). Legal dilemmas for clinicians involved in the care and treatment of children and young people with mental disorder Child: Care Health and Development, 36(4) 592–596.

Care Quality Commission: Monitoring the Mental Health Act 2018/19. https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/20200206_mhareport1819_report.pdf

Care Quality Commission Regulation 11: Need for consent, 2014, Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities). https://www.cqc.org.uk/guidance-providers/regulations-enforcement/regulation-11-need-consent

Children Act 1989 Ch. 41. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/41/contents

Coyne

(2008). Children’s participation in consultations and decision-making at health service level: A review of the literature International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(11), 1682–1689.

Finch

(1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21(1), 105–114.

10.

Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech AHA 1986 AC 112.

11.

Griffith

(2016). What is Gillick competence? Human Vaccine Immunotherapy, 12(1), 244–247.

12.

Horowicz

E. M.

(2017). The zone of parental control, the “gilded cage” and the deprivation of a child’s liberty: Getting around Article 5. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 22(1), 2–9.

13.

Mental Capacity Act 2005 (Amended 2019) Ch. 9. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/section/1

14.

Mental Health Act: Code of practice 1983 . (Amended 2017). Department of Health and Social Care. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/code-of-practice-mental-health-act-1983

15.

NHS Foundation Hospital v P. (2014). EWHC 1650.

16.

P and Q v Surrey County Council [2014] UKSC 19 On appeal from [2011] EWCA Civ 1257; [2011] EWCA Civ 190.

17.

Paul

Foreman

D. M.

Kent

(2000). Out-patient clinic attendance. Consent from children and young people: ethical aspects and practical considerations. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 5, 203–211.

18.

Re A-F (Children) 2018 EWHC 138.

19.

Re D (a child) 2015 EWHC 922.

20.

Re D (a child) (on appeal from 2017) 2019 EWCA Civ 1695.

21.

Re R (a minor) (wardship: medical treatment) 1992 4 All ER 177.

22.

Richardson

(1999). Review of the Mental Health Act 1983: Report of the expert committee. Department of Health.

23.

Selinger

C. P.

(2009). The right to consent: Is it absolute? British Journal of Medical Practitioners 2(2), 50–54.

24.

Stretch

McCann

Roberts

S. A.

Elton

Baxter

Brabin

(2009). A qualitative study to assess school nurses’ views on vaccinating 12–13 year old school girls against human papillomavirus without parental consent BMC Public Health, 9, 254.

25.

Tan

J. O.

Passerini

G. E.

Stewart

(2007). Consent and confidentiality in clinical work with young people. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2(2), 191–210.

26.

Thomas

Chipchase

Rippon

McArdle

(2015). The application of mental health legislation in younger children British Journal of Psychiatry Bulletin, 39(6), 302–304.

27.

Vallance

A. K.

(2014). Seeking clarity in the twilight zone: Commentary on. . . Adolescent Decision-Making and the Zone of Parental Control. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 20(2), 151–152.