This study examined the psychometric properties of the parent’s versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule–Extended Form (PANAS-X) in a community sample of Portuguese parents. A total of 1100 SDQ and PANAS-X were collected from an online sample of 761 parents, whose ages ranged from 23 to 65 years (M = 42, SD = 5). Confirmatory factor analyses provided evidence of the internal factor structure of both the SDQ and the PANAS-X and invariance of the factor structure across age and gender groups, with the exception of the SDQ, which failed to provide evidence of invariance between genders. Internal reliability and discriminant validity were confirmed for both measures, although convergent validity was only confirmed for the PANAS-X. Concurrent validity was also confirmed by comparing the results from the SDQ dimensions and the PANAS-X broad dimensions subscales.
AchenbachT. M.RuffleT. M. (2000). The Child Behavior Checklist and related forms for assessing behavioral/emotional problems and competencies. Pediatrics in Review, 21, 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.21-8-265
2.
AnthonyJ. L.LoniganC. J.HooeE. S.PhillipsB. M. (2002). An affect-based, hierarchical model of temperament and its relations with internalizing symptomatology. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 31, 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3104_7
3.
AzevedoA. F.Seabra-SantosM. J.GasparM. F.HomemT. C. (2013). The incredible years basic parent training for Portuguese preschoolers with AD/HD behaviors: Does it make a difference?Child and Youth Care Forum, 42, 403–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-013-9207-0
4.
ByrneB. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
5.
ClarkL. A.WatsonD. (1991). Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 316–336. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.100.3.316
6.
Di RisoD.SalcuniS.ChessaD.RaudinoA.LisA.AltoèG. (2010). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Early evidence of its reliability and validity in a community sample of Italian children. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 570–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.005
7.
EbesutaniC.OkamuraK.Higa-McMillanC.ChorpitaB. F. (2011). A psychometric analysis of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children-Parent Version in a school sample. Psychological Assessment, 23, 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022057
8.
FleitlichB.LoureiroM.FonsecaA.GasparF. (2005). Questionário de Capacidades e Dificuldades (SDQ-Por). www.sdqinfo.com
9.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
10.
GalinhaI. C.Pais RibeiroJ. (2005). Contribuição para o estudo de uma versão portuguesa da Positive Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): II estudo psicométrico [Contribution for the study of the Portuguese version of the PANAS: II psychometric study]. Análise Psicológica, 23, 219–227.
11.
GalinhaI. C.PereiraC. R.EstevesF. (2013). Confirmatory factor analysis and temporal invariance of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26, 671–679. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000400007
12.
GoodmanA.LampingD. L.PloubidisG. B. (2010). When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x
HairJ.BlackW.BabinB.AndersonR.TathamR. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson; Prentice Hall.
15.
LaurentJ.CatanzaroS. J.JoinerT. E.Jr.RudolphK. D.PotterK. I.LambertS.OsborneL.GathrightT. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11, 326–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.326
16.
LiJ. B.DelvecchioE.Di RisoD.LisA.SalcuniS. (2017). Early evidence of the Italian Parent-Report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-P). Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 48, 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-016-0646-3
17.
LoniganC. J.HooeE. S.DavidC. F.KistnerJ. A. (1999). Positive and negative affectivity in children: Confirmatory factor analysis of a two-factor model and its relation to symptoms of anxiety and depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.67.3.374
18.
LoniganC. J.PhillipsB. M.HooeE. S. (2003). Relations of positive and negative affectivity to anxiety and depression in children: Evidence from a latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 465–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.71.3.465
MarzocchiG. M.CapronC.Di PietroM.Duran TauleriaE.DuymeM.FrigerioA.GasparM. F.HamiltonH.PithonG.SimõesA.ThérondC. (2004). The use of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Southern European countries. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 132(Suppl. 2), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-004-2007-1
21.
MikolajewskiA. J.AllanN. P.HartS. A.LoniganC. J.TaylorJ. (2013). Negative affect shares genetic and environmental influences with symptoms of childhood internalizing and externalizing disorders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9681-0
22.
PechorroP.PoiaresC.VieiraR. (2011). Propriedades psicométricas do Questionário de Capacidades e de Dificuldades na versão portuguesa de auto-resposta [Psychometric properties of the Portuguese self-report version of the Strenghts and Difficulties Questionnaire]. Revista de Psiquiatria Consiliar e de Ligação, 16–19, 99–109.
23.
StoneL. L.OttenR.EngelsR. C.VermulstA. A.JanssensJ. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13, 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-010-0071-2
24.
WarnickE. M.BrackenM. B.KaslS. (2008). Screening efficiency of the Child Behavior Checklist and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A systematic review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 13, 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2007.00461.x
25.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. The University of Iowa.
26.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
27.
Youth in Mind. (2015). Information for researchers and professionals about the Strengths & Difficulties Questionnaires. http://www.sdqinfo.com
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
