The Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument–version 2 (MAYSI-2) was developed to help identify mental health needs of young people admitted to youth detention centres. Only one study has applied the tool to a UK population and none have looked at young people who live in residential and secure care in Scotland. This study aimed to assess the validity of the MAYSI-2 in Scotland with a looked after and accommodated population. Boys and girls in a large education and care centre were asked to complete the MAYSI-2 within 72 hours of being accommodated. A total of 168 males and 69 females with a mean age of 15 completed the tool. Substantial levels of mental health need were identified. Girls appeared to have higher needs on all areas, bar alcohol and substance misuse. The MAYSI-2 had good internal consistency and exploratory factor analysis showed good overlap with the tool’s original factor model. As a result, there can be more confidence in the validity and consistency of the tool with this population. This is also further evidence of the high need of this population, particularly girls.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, The University of Vermont.
2.
ArcherR. P.StrednyR. V.MasonJ. A.ArnauR. C. (2004). An examination and replication of the psychometric properties of the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-(MAYSI-2) among adolescents in detention settings. Assessment, 11, 290–302.
3.
BaileyS.DoreleijersT.TarbuckP. (2006). Recent developments in mental health screening and assessment in juvenile justice systems. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15, 391–406. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2005.12.004
4.
BaileyS.TarbuckP. (2006). Recent advances in the development of screening tools for mental health in young offenders. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 19, 373–377.
5.
BlowerA.AddoA.HodgsonJ.LamingtonL.TowlsonK. (2004). Mental health of ‘looked after’ children: A needs assessment. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 9, 117–129.
6.
CauffmanE. (2004). A statewide screening of mental health symptoms among juvenile offenders in detention. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 430–439.
7.
CauffmanE.LexcenF. J.GoldweberA.ShulmanE. P.GrissoT. (2007). Gender differences in mental health symptoms among delinquent and community youth. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5, 287–307.
8.
ColinsO. F.GrissoT.MulderE.VermeirenR. (2014). The relation of standardized mental health screening and categorical assessment in detained male adolescents. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 24, 339–349.
9.
DongY.PengC. Y. J. (2013). Principled missing data methods for researchers. SpringerPlus, 2(1), Article 222.
10.
DuffL.McNabI. (2004). Effective Interventions Unit – Young people with, or at risk of developing, problematic substance misuse: A guide to assessment. Scottish Executive. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2004/10/20010/43974
11.
FordJ. D.ChapmanJ. F.PearsonG.BorumR.WolpawJ. M. (2008). Psychometric status and clinical utility of the MAYSI-2 with girls and boys in juvenile detention. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 30, 87–99.
12.
FordT.VostanisP.MeltzerH.GoodmanR. (2007). Psychiatric disorder among British children looked after by local authorities: Comparison with children living in private households. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 319–325.
13.
GoodmanR. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.
14.
GorsuchR. L. (1990). Common factor analysis versus component analysis: Some well and little known facts. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 33–39.
15.
GrettonH. M.CliftR. J. (2011). The mental health needs of incarcerated youth in British Columbia, Canada. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 34, 109–115.
16.
GrissoT.BarnumR. (1998). Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument (MAYSI): Preliminary manual and technical report. Worcester: University of Massachusetts Medical School.
17.
GrissoT.BarnumR. (2003). Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-Version 2: User’s manual and technical report. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
18.
GrissoT.BarnumR. (2006). Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-Version 2: User’s Manual and technical report. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
19.
GrissoT.BarnumR.FletcherK. E.CauffmanE.PeuscholdD. (2001). Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument for mental health needs of juvenile justice youths. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 541–548.
20.
GrissoT.FuscoS.Paiva-SalisburyM.PerraultR.WilliamsV.BarnumR. (2012). The Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-Version 2 (MAYSI-2): Comprehensive research review. Worcester: University of Massachusetts Medical School.
21.
HayesM. A.McReynoldsL. S.WassermanG. A. (2005). Paper and voice MAYSI-2 format comparability and concordance with the voice DISC-IV. Assessment, 12, 395–403.
22.
HogartyK. Y.HinesC. V.KromreyJ. D.FerronJ. M.MumfordK. R. (2005). The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of sample size, communality, and over determination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 202–226.
23.
KaufmanJ.BirmaherB.BrentD.RaoU.FlynnC.MoreciP.. . . RyanN. (1997). Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children – Present and Lifetime Version (KSADS-PL): Initial reliability and validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 980–988.
24.
KerigP. K.WardR. M.VanderzeeK. L.MoeddelM. A. (2009). Posttraumatic stress as a mediator of the relationship between trauma and mental health problems among juvenile delinquents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1214–1225.
25.
LennoxC.O’MalleyK.BellV.ShawJ.DolanM. (2015). The validity and clinical utility of the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument – Version 2 (MAYSI-2) in the UK. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 25, 207–219.
ManeyS. (2011). Violent and nonviolent juvenile offenders: Comparisons concerning self-report of mental health symptoms and response styles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology, Boston.
28.
McCannJ. B.JamesA.WilsonS.DunnG. (1996). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in young people in the care system. British Medical Journal, 313, 1529–1530.
29.
MeltzerH.GatwardR.CorbinT.GoodmanR.FordT. (2003). The mental health of young people looked after by local authorities in England. London, England: Office for National Statistics.
MountJ.ListerA.BennunI. (2004). Identifying the mental health needs of looked after young people. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 9, 363–382.
32.
NordnessP. D.GrummertM.BanksD.SchindlerM. L.MossM. M.GallagherK.EpsteinM. H. (2002). Screening the mental health needs of youths in juvenile detention. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 53(2), 43–50.
33.
RidleyJ.McCluskeyS. (2003). Exploring the perceptions of young people in care and care leavers of the health needs. Scottish Journal of Residential Care, 2(1), 55–65.
34.
SchaferJ. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3–15.
35.
Scottish Government. (2015). Children’s social work statistics Scotland. A national statistics publication for Scotland: 2013–14. Available from www.Scotland.gov.uk
36.
StathisS.DoolanI.FlemingR.HeathK.ArnettA.CoryS. (2008). Use of the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument to assess mental health problems in young people within an Australian youth detention centre. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 44, 438–443.
37.
VelicerW. F.FavaJ. L. (1998). Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231–251.
