Formulating autism systemically: Part 2 – A 12-year prospective case study

Abstract

This prospective case study illustrates the ideas on the developmental origins of some cases of autism that were described in Part 1 of this article. We explored and found support for several systemic hypotheses regarding the experience of ‘Graeme’ and his mother. Graeme’s story is told prospectively from the age of 3 until 15. Three independent sources of information are reported: hypotheses from the literature and case review in Part 1 of this article, the school’s experience, and observations from the assessments of attachment when Graeme was turning 6. These three streams of information are integrated here. The review of the literature and clinical cases gives us a wide-angle lens, empirically supporting our focus on danger in relationships. The school’s experience describes working with a child with undiagnosed autism. The assessments of attachment both provide information about family members’ psychological strategies for protection from danger and also include the mother’s childhood history of family threat. Their synthesis permits us to construct a developmental history, from Graeme’s mother’s childhood history of being triangulated into her parents’ hidden marital discord to it’s repetition for Graeme in her own marriage. New observations included mum’s postural/gestural communication to Graeme and her possible ambivalence about males. Strikingly, Graeme was a case study (Attachment & Family Therapy, ch. 6) before he was diagnosed with autism. That presentation focused on Graeme’s feeling of rejection by his father. In the same book, an interpersonal formulation of autism was offered (ch. 3), but it was not connected to Graeme, showing that when one lacks crucial information, the clinical formulation is distorted. The crucial information in this case was the mother’s psychological history. Our case suggests that filling the blind spot in the research on autism with information about family functioning over at least two generations might change the understanding of autism in ways that could help families and their children.