In 2005, the Scottish Executive recommended that young people with severe mental health difficulties should be managed in the community wherever possible. This study reports on the clinical outcomes associated with the development of a Child and Adolescent Mental Health (CAMH) Intensive Treatment Service (ITS) embedded within a Tier Four CAMHS structure. Following intervention, mean CGAS ratings significantly improved by 16 points (p<0.001) and HoNOSCA Clinical Scores significantly decreased by a mean of 6.94 points (p<0.001). This trend was replicated in self-report measures, where service users reported significant clinical improvements in mental health symptoms and indicators of quality of life. A CAMHS ITS, with close links to an adolescent inpatient unit, can provide a balanced care approach where young people with severe mental health difficulties can be treated in the community, where possible, without compromising on patient safety and quality of care.
BeckJ. S.BeckA. T.JollyJ. B.SteerR. A. (2005). Beck Youth Inventories, Second Edition for Children and Adolescents (BYI-II). San Antonio, Texas: Harcourt Assessment, Inc.
2.
BlantzB.SchmidtM. H. (2000). Practitioner review: Preconditions and outcome of inpatient treatment in child and adolescent psychiatry. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 703–712
3.
DuffyF.SkeldonJ. (2012). The impact of the development of a CAMHS Intensive Treatment Service and service redesign on psychiatric admissions. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, (in press).
4.
GarraldaM. E.YatesP.HigginsonI. (2000). Child and adolescent mental health service use HoNOSCA as an outcome measure. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 52–58.
5.
GowersS. G.HarringtonR. C.WhittonA.LelliottP.BeevorA.WingJ.JezzardR. (1999). Brief Scale for measuring the outcomes of emotional and behavioural disorders in children: Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA). British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 413–416.
6.
GowersS. G.LevineW.Bailey-RogersS.ShoreA.BurhouseE. (2002). Use of a routine, self report outcome measure (HoNOSCA-SR) in two adolescent mental health services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 266–269.
7.
GreenJ.JacobsB.BeechamJ.DunnG.KrollL.TobiasC.BriskmanJ. (2007). Inpatient treatment in child and adolescent psychiatry - a prospective study of health gain and costs. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 1259–1267.
8.
GreenJ.KrollL.ImrieD.FrancesF. M.BegumK.HarrisonL.AnsonR. (2001). Health gain and outcome predictors during inpatient and related day treatment in child and adolescent psychiatry. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 325–332.
9.
HawthornG.HerrmanH.MurphyB. (2006). Interpreting the WHOQOL-Bref: Preliminary Population Norms and Effect Sizes. Social Indicators Research, 77, 37–59.
NHS Health Advisory Service. (1995). Together we Stand: The commissioning, role and management of child and adolescent mental health services. London: HMSO.
16.
O’HerlihyA.LelliotP.BannisterD.CotgroveA.FarrH.TullochS. (2007). Increased inequity in provision of child and adolescent mental health inpatient services in England between 1999 and 2006. Psychiatric Bulletin, 31, 454–456.
17.
O’HerlihyA.WorrallA.BanerjeeS. (2001). National Inpatient Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Study (NICAPS). Final report to the Department of Health. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists Research Unit.
18.
PfeifferS.StrzeleckiS. (1990). Inpatient psychiatric treatment of children and adolescents: A review of outcome studies. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 29, 847–853.
19.
Scottish Executive. (2004). Psychiatric inpatient services for children and young people in Scotland: A way forward. Child Health Support Group: Inpatient Working Group Report.
ShafferD.GouldM. S.BrasicJ.AmbrosiniP.FisherP.BirdH. R.AluwahliaS. (1983). A children’s global assessment scale (CGAS). Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 1228–1231.
23.
SharmaV. K.WilkinsonG.FearS. (1999). Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: A case study in general psychiatry. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 395–398.
24.
ShepperdS.HarrisL.DollH.BullL.GowersS.JamesA.…PollackJ. (2007). Systematic review and mapping study of alternatives to inpatient care for children and adolescents with complex mental health needs. Retrieved from http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/project/141-final-report.pdf. Accessed 27/02/2012.
25.
SimpsonW.CowieL.WilkinsonL.LockN.MontheithG. (2010). The effectiveness of a community intensive therapy team on young people’s mental health outcomes. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 15, 217–223.
26.
ThornicroftG.TansellaM. (2004). Components of a modern mental health service: A pragmatic balance of community and hospital care. Overview of systematic evidence. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 283–290.
27.
TullochS.LelliottP.BannisterD.AndiappanM.O’HerlihyA.BeechamJ.AytonA. (2008). The Costs, Outcomes and Satisfaction for Inpatient Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Services (COSI-CAPS) study. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D. Retrieved from http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/COSI%20CAPS.pdf
28.
World Health Organization. (2001). The World Health Report. Mental health: New understanding, new hope. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/whr/2001/en/whr01_en.pdf. Accessed 27/02/2012.
29.
WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28, 551–558.
30.
Worrall-DaviesA.KiernanK. (2005). Using a virtual team: An evaluation of the Bradford CAMHS intensive home treatment approach. Leeds, UK: Bradford Children and Young People’s Partnership. University of Leeds.
31.
YatesP.GarraldaM.E.HigginsonI. (1999). Paddington Complexity Scale and Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 413–416.
