This article describes users' views of a brief group therapy intervention for
children with chronic illness or disability, together with a parallel group for
parents. The aims of the intervention were to reduce feelings of isolation and
facilitate coping. Users' views about research methods were also sought to
inform the design of subsequent evaluation of effectiveness and the potential
for long-term benefit. Grounded theory methodology was used and 27 participants
were interviewed from 11 of the 17 families eligible to take part. A model
emerged, which suggested that parents and children brought to the group common
and specific difficulties. The benefits people described related to their
perceived reasons for attending even if these were different from the
therapist's overall aims. There was evidence of increased social support and
range of coping responses. Participants gave constructive criticism of the group
and articulated their views about acceptable research methods. They emphasized
the need for research to value and respect the views of participants. This study
suggests that this is a promising intervention being both acceptable and helpful
and warrants a more extensive evaluation, which takes into account participants'
preference for face-to-face interviews and is respectful and valuing of their perspective.