The focus of this three-part study was on the recognition of, and service
response to, families in which negative or rejecting behaviour is shown towards
one of the children, whereas the siblings are accepted. Part 1 was an
interview-based survey of health visitors’ views. They were able to
identify families with such problems but were seldom in a position to intervene
constructively and referrals to specialist services were not easily achieved.
Part 2 was a case file study based on referrals of alleged emotional abuse to
social services offices. The nature of the risk-assessment process undertaken by
social workers was explored and it was shown that, beyond the initial stage of
seeing the families, a lack of capacity was evident to provide structured
assessments of the child, formal assessment of parenting and observation of the
parent-child relationship. One-third of the emotional abuse cases were subject
to child protection registration but only a minority received substantial social
work intervention. Although it was found that singly rather than jointly
referred children were given less priority and had less-thorough assessments,
this could have been related to other characteristics of these children. Part 3
explored how child mental health professionals conceptualized the
families’ difficulties, devised therapeutic interventions, considered
obstacles to engaging the families and assessed the benefit of psychological
help. It was acknowledged that some of these families can present a considerable
challenge to any child welfare system because of denial of the problem or
difficulties in engaging with existing services. More attention needs to be paid
in these cases to maternal mental health problems, especially depression.
Recommendations are made for developing more accessible preventive services
while ensuring the protection and effective treatment of the singled-out child.