In child psychiatric work strategies for engaging the family in strengthening the child’s coping should be included as part of the treatment plan. As family members experience the reality of the family differently, information from each family member provides a broader picture of the family. Clinicians can help the family achieve insights into relationships and roles by using a figure placement technique, the Kvebaek Family Sculpture Technique (KFST). We examined distances in KFST figure placements made by mothers, fathers and adolescents in order to explore closeness and distance, or family cohesion. We found that families often perceived changes in the perception of distance between family members following family therapy. Assessments by family members, as well as by clinicians, are needed to catch the complexity of family cohesion. A dialogue with the family about the various perspectives presented by family members contributes to a new understanding of family interaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aasland, A., Nøvik, T. S., Flatø, B., & Vandvik, I. H. (1998). A multimodal, prospective assessment of outcome in families of children with early onset of juvenile chronic arthritis . Families, Systems & Health, 16(3), 267-280 .
2.
Berry, J. T., Hurley, J. H., & Worthington, E. L. (1990). Empirical validity of the Kvebaek Family Sculpture Technique . The American Journal of Family Therapy18, 19-31 .
3.
Byng-Hall, J. (1999). Rewriting family scripts. Improvisation and systems change. New York: Guilford Press .
4.
Cromwell, R., Fournier, D., & Kvebæk, D. (1980). The Kvebaek Family Sculpture Technique: A diagnostic and research tool in family therapy. Jonesboro, TN: Pilgrimage .
5.
Dundas, I. (1994). The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale III in a Norwegian sample . Family Process, 33(2), 191-202 .
6.
Freud, S. (1989). Den gode relasjon [The good relation]. In H. Holter & R. Kalleberg (Eds.), Kvalitative metoder i samfunnsforskning. [Qualitative methods in social science research]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget .
7.
Garmezy N., & Masten, A. S. (1994). Chronic adversities. In M. Rutter, E. Taylor, & L. Hersov (Eds.), Child and adolescent psychiatry. Modern approaches (pp. 191-208). Oxford: Blackwell Science .
8.
Gehring, T. M., & Schulteiss, R. B. (1987). Spatial representations and assessment of family relationships . The American Journal of Family Therapy, 15, 261-264 .
9.
Kvebaek, D. J. (1973). Skulpturtest: Et diagnostisk hjelpemiddel i familieterapi. [The Sculpture Test: A diagnostic tool in family therapy] . Sandoz Informasjon, 1.
10.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
11.
Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., Hetherington, D. M., & Plomin, R. (1999). Relationships between parenting and adolescent adjustment over time: Genetic and environmental contributions . Developmental Psychopathology, 35, 680-692 .
12.
O’Connor, T. G., Hetherington, E. M., & Reiss, D. (1998). Family systems and adolescent developments: Shared and non-shared risk and protective factors in nondivorced and remarried families . Developmental Psychopathology, 35, 680-692 .
13.
Olson, D. H., Portner, J., & Lavee, Y. (1985). FACES III. Minneapolis: Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota .
14.
Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H., & Russell, C. S. (1979). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications . Family Process, 18, 3-28 .
15.
Reiss, D., Hetherington, E. M., Plomin, R., Howe, G. W., Simmens, S. J., O’Connor, T. J., Bussell, D. A., Anderson, E. R., & Law, T. (1995). Genetic questions for environmental studies. Differential parenting and psychopathology in adolescence . Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 925-936 .
16.
Rutter, M. (1985). Resilience in the face of adversity: Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder . British Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 598-611 .
17.
Rutter, M., McDonald, H., LeCouteur, A., Harrington, R., Bolton, P., & Bailey, A. (1990). Genetic factors in child psychiatric disorders: II. Empirical findings . Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 39-83 .
18.
Sauber, S. R., L’Abate, L., Weeks, G. R., & Buchanan, W.L. (1993). The dictionary of family psychology and family therapy, 2nd ed. London: Sage .
19.
Seifer, R., Sameroff, A. J., Baldwin, C. S., & Baldwin, A. (1992). Child and family factors that ameliorate risk between 4 and 13 years of age . Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(5), 893-903 .
20.
Solem, M. B. (1998). Family cohesion. Mother’s, father’s and the adolescent’s perception of closeness and distance before and after family therapy. An exploratory study using the Kvebaek Family Sculpture Technique. Master of Social Work thesis, Oslo University College and University of Trondheim.
21.
Solem, M. B. (2000). Empiricism taken with a pinch of salt. Significant problems in family research in child and adolescent psychiatry. Part 1: Reliability and validity of family measurement techniques . Fokus på familien [Family Focus], 4, 254-264 .
22.
Solem, M. B., & Nøvik, T.S. (1995). Informants’ experience with the Kvebaek Family Sculpture Technique; a comparison between a clinical and an epidemiological sample . Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 439-445 .
23.
Stern, D. N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York: Basic Books .
24.
Stierlin, H. (1969). Conflict and reconciliation: Study in human relations and schizophrenia. New York: Anchor Books .
25.
Vandvik, I. H., & Eckblad, G. (1992). The Kvebæk Family Sculpture Technique and FACES III in the evaluation of families of children with newly diagnosed rheumatic diseases . Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 46(4), 261-268 .
26.
Walsh, F. (1996). The concept of family resilience: Crisis and challenge . Family Process, 35, 261-281 .
27.
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds. High risk children from birth to adulthood: London: Cornell University Press .
28.
Wood, B. (1985). Proximity and hierarchy: Orthogonal dimensions of family interconnectedness . Family Process, 24, 487-507 .
29.
Wood, B. L., Klebba, K. B., & Miller, B. D. (2000). Evolving the biobehavioral family model: The fit of attachment . Family Process, 39(3), 319-344 .
