In September 2020, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the case of G.L. v. Italy found the Italian authorities in violation of their Convention obligations towards a child with disabilities. More specifically, as they had taken insufficient action to secure the implementation of support to which the learner had a legal right, Italy had violated its obligations under Article 2 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights (‘FP’, right to education) combined with Article 14 European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’, prohibition of discrimination) (para. 70). The judgment appears to be a cause for joy amongst those advocating for inclusive education. Yet the ECtHR’s current reasoning might not only herald positive developments in this area. In line with some previous cases, the Court uses Article 14 as a stepping stone for the state obligation to provide inclusive education. In considering reasonable accommodations through the lens of inclusive education, the Court conflates the two analyses. These entangled analyses under Article 14, as applied in G.L. and in the prior judgement of Stoian, could create negative incentives for states to draft legal provisions concerning inclusive education and take the necessary steps for implementation there.
AnastasiouDGregoryMKauffmanJM (2018) Articlue 24-education. In: BantekasISteinMAAnastasiouD (eds) The Un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 656–704.
2.
BamforthNMalikMO’CinneideC (2008) Discrimination Law: Theory and Context. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
3.
BroderickA (2019) Emerging trends in the jurisprudence of the European court of human rights. In: De BecoGQuinlivanSLordJE (eds), The Right to Inclusive Education in International Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 424–446.
4.
BroderickA (2020) Transforming hearts and minds concerning people with disabilities: viewing the UN treaty bodies and the strasbourg court through the lens of inclusive equality. Erasmus Law Review13(3): 113–129.
5.
CeraR (2017) Article 5: equality and non-discrimination. In: Della FinaV, et al. (eds) The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Cham: Springer, pp. 157–174.
6.
ColkerR (2009) When Is Separate Unequal? A Disability Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Committee of Ministers (2006) Recommendation ‘on the Council of Europe Action Plan to promote the rights and full participation of people with disabilities in society: improving the quality of life of people with disabilities in Europe 2006–2015’. Council of Europe.
De BecoG (2019a) Comprehensive legal analysis of article 24 of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. In: De BecoGQuinlivanSLordJE (eds) The Right to Inclusive Education in International Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 58–92.
10.
De BecoG. (2019b) Progressive realisation and the right to inclusive education. In: De BecoGQuinlivanSLordJE (eds) The Right to Inclusive Education in International Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 190–212.
11.
D’EspallierA (2020) Straatsburgse blik op inclusief onderwijs-verstand op redelijke aanpassingen. Tijdschrift voor jeugd- en kinderrechten2020(4): 256–262.
FerriD (2019) The past, present and future of the right to inclusive education in Italy. In: De BecoGQuinlivanSLordJE (eds) The Right to Inclusive Education in International Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 547–579.
15.
FlynnE (2017) Article 13: Access to justice. In: Della FinaVCeraRPalmisanoG (eds) The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary. Cham: Springer.
16.
FredmanS (2011) Discrimination Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
FredmanS (2018) Comparative Human Rights Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
GerardsJ (2018) Prohibition of discrimination. In: Van DijkP, et al. (eds) Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights. Cambridge: Intersentia.
19.
HarrisDJO’BoyleMBatesEDBuckleyC (2018) Harris O’Boyle & Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
QuinlivanS (2019) Reasonable accommodation. In: De BecoGQuinlivanSLordJE (eds) The Right to Inclusive Education in International Human Rights Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–189.
21.
SchabasW (2015) The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
SpinoyMLievensJ (2020) Stoian t. Roemenië: stap terug of status quoHandicap & Recht4(1): 23–31.
23.
SpinoyMVrielinkJ (2022) Sources of discrimination law. In: RingelheimJSolankeIO‘CinneideC (eds). Research Handbook on European Anti-Discrimination Law. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, accepted for publication.
24.
SpinoyMWillemsK (2019-20) Het M-decreet. “M” voor méér of minder buitengewoon onderwijs?Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsrecht en Onderwijsbeleid1-2: 58–113.
25.
SpinoyMWillemsK (2020) Inclusive education in strasbourg: still learning? In: CzechP (ed) et al. (eds) European Yearbook on Human Rights 2020. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 281–320.
26.
SpinoyMWillemsK (2020-21) Recht op inclusief onderwijs: het Europees hof vor de rechten van de mens zet de puntjes op de i (van inclusief). Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsrecht en Onderwijsbeleid 20203: 276–283.
