In 2011, the UK government abolished the national default retirement age. While this could support extended working lives and promote individual choice, it could also be a neoliberal ‘ploy’ to individualise the risks of old age. The question, then, is what impact does the removal of mandatory retirement have in practice: does it help to promote individual choice and autonomy? Or does it lead to work intensification and the individualisation of the risks of demographic change? Or both, perhaps simultaneously? Drawing on original qualitative and quantitative empirical data from UK and USA universities, this article considers the impact of removing mandatory retirement ages on individual workers in higher education. It argues that legal reform may have prompted or encouraged work intensification in universities, including through an increased focus and use of performance management. Thus, in practice, the consequences of removing retirement ages for individuals are mixed.
BassSACaroFG (2001) Productive aging: a conceptual framework. In: Morrow-HowellNHinterlongJSherradenMW (eds) Productive Aging: Concepts and Challenges. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, pp. 37–80.
2.
BeckVWilliamsG (2015) The (performance) management of retirement and the limits of individual choice. Work, Employment & Society29(2): 267–277.
3.
BIS (2011) Phasing out the default retirement age: government response to consultation. URN 11/536, 13 January, London.
4.
BlackhamA (2015a) Managing without default retirement in universities: a comparative picture from Australia. Legal Studies35(3): 502–531.
5.
BlackhamA (2015b) Rethinking working time to support older workers. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations31(2): 119–140.
6.
BlackhamA (2016a) Organisational responses to the abolition of mandatory retirement: case studies of Australian university practice. Industrial Law Journal45(2): 144–175.
7.
BlackhamA (2016b) Reforming default retirement ages: Regulating out precariousness for older workers?European Labour Law Journal7(1): 4–30.
8.
BlackhamA (2019a) An experimentalist approach to equality: a case study of retirement in the UK university sector. Legal Studies39(4): 598–617.
9.
BlackhamA (2019b) Interrogating the ‘dignity’ argument for mandatory retirement: An undignified development?Industrial Law Journal48(3): 377–415.
10.
BoxallPMackyK (2014) High-involvement work processes, work intensification and employee well-being. Work, Employment and Society28(6): 963–984.
11.
BrysonC (2004) What about the workers? The expansion of higher education and the transformation of academic work. Industrial Relations Journal35(1): 38–57.
12.
BythewayB (2005) Ageism. In: JohnsonMLBengtsonVLColemanPG. et al. (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338–345.
DewhurstE (2013) Intergenerational balance, mandatory retirement and age discrimination in Europe: How can the ECJ better support national courts in finding a balance between the generations?Common Market Law Review50(5): 1333–1362.
15.
DuncanC (2008) The dangers and limitations of equality agendas as means for tackling old-age prejudice. Ageing & Society28(8): 1133–1158.
EvansJG (2003) Age discrimination: implications of the ageing process. In: FredmanSSpencerS (eds) Age as an Equality Issue: Legal and Policy Perspectives. Oxford: Hart, pp. 11–20.
18.
Eversheds (2013) Eversheds UK HR e-briefing: How are employers managing without the default retirement age?April, London.
19.
FeaginJOrumASjobergG (1991) Introduction: the nature of the case study. In: FeaginJOrumASjobergG (eds) A Case for the Case Study. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 1–26.
20.
FredmanS (2003) The age of equality. In: FredmanSSpencerS (eds) Age as an Equality Issue: Legal and Policy Perspectives. Oxford: Hart, pp. 21–69.
21.
GalliganDJ (2015) Goodbye to the EJRA. Oxford Magazine(Noughth Week, Hilary Term), pp. 4–6.
22.
GossS (2015) Consideration of comments on the EJRA made by the University’s Appeal Court. Oxford Magazine(Noughth Week, Hilary Term), p. 6.
23.
GreenF (2001) It’s been a hard day’s night: the concentration and intensification of work in late twentieth-century Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations39(1): 53–80.
24.
GreenF (2004) Why has work effort become more intense?Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society43(4): 709–741.
25.
GuestDEClintonM (2007) Human resource management and university performance: final report. November, London.
26.
HartmanYDarabS (2012) A call for slow scholarship: a case study on the intensification of academic life and its implications for pedagogy. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies34(1–2): 49–60.
27.
Hesse-BiberSN (2010) Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. New York: Guilford Press.
28.
KinmanGWrayS (2013) Higher stress: a survey of stress and well-being among staff in higher education. July.
29.
Koopman-BoydenPGMacdonaldL (2003) Ageing, work performance and managing ageing academics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management25(1): 29–40.
30.
LorenzC (2012) If you’re so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry38(3): 599–629.
31.
LorettoWVickerstaffS (2015) Gender, age and flexible working in later life. Work, Employment and Society29(2): 233–249.
32.
MacnicolJ (2015) Neoliberalising Old Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
ManfrediSVickersL (2009) Retirement and age discrimination: managing retirement in higher education. Industrial Law Journal38(4): 343–364.
34.
ManfrediSVickersL (2013a) Meeting the challenges of active ageing in the workplace: Is the abolition of retirement the answer?European Labour Law Journal4(4): 251–271.
35.
ManfrediSVickersL (2013b) Pensioning off the mandatory retirement age: implications for the higher education sector. Legal Studies33(2): 289–311.
36.
MaunoSMinkkinenJTsupariH. et al. (2019) Do older employees suffer more from work intensification and other intensified job demands? Evidence from upper white-collar workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology4(1): 3.
37.
McGovernPHillSMillsC. et al. (2007) Market, Class, and Employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MoughtonCManfrediS (2011) Managing Flexible Retirement and Extended Working Lives: A Resource Guide. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University.
40.
OgbonnaEHarrisLC (2004) Work intensification and emotional labour among UK university lecturers: an exploratory study. Organization Studies25(7): 1185–1203.
41.
PattonMQ (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage.
RosenmanLMcDonaldS (1995) How should universities respond to the abolition of compulsory retirement?Australian Universities’ Review38(1): 63–6.
44.
SangKPowellAFinkelR. et al. (2015) ‘Being an academic is not a 9–5 job’: long working hours and the ‘ideal worker’ in UK academia. Labour & Industry: A Journal of the Social and Economic Relations of Work25(3): 235–249.
45.
SargeantM (2010) The default retirement age: legitimate aims and disproportionate means. Industrial Law Journal39(3): 244–263.
SimonsH (2009) Case Study Research in Practice. Los Angeles: Sage.
48.
TaylorP (2013) Performance Management and the New Workplace Tyranny – A Report for the Scottish Trades Union Congress. Glasgow: Scottish Trades Union Congress.
49.
ThomasRBartlettEWoollardS. et al. (2013) Recovery in Sight? The State of HR. London: Speechly Bircham and King’s College London.
50.
TytherleighMYWebbCCooperCL. et al. (2005) Occupational stress in UK higher education institutions: a comparative study of all staff categories. Higher Education Research & Development24(1): 41–61.
