Repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell as a “Policy Window”

Abstract

This paper argues that the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT) in the United States represents a policy window that would lend itself to the passage of a federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA). Although attitudes towards lesbian, gay, and bisexual workers are changing, no comprehensive federal legislation to protect these workers currently exists. Using John Kingdon's policy analysis model, our paper considers the history and evolution of public attitude that led to the repeal of DADT. Further, how this evolution has opened a window of opportunity for the passage of a federal ENDA is also considered. Implications for workplace advocates, including considerations for policy, practice, and research, are explored.

Keywords

Organizational behavior workplace discrimination lesbian gay and bisexual workers Don't Ask Don't Tell Employment Non-Discrimination Act

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Civil Liberties Union (2007) Working in the shadows: Ending employment discrimination for LGBT Americans. Available at: http://www.aclu.org/files/pdfs/lgbt/enda_20070917.pdf (accessed 1 October 2008).

Badgett

MVL,

Lau

Sears

(2007) Bias in the Workplace: Consistent Evidence of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination. Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.

Butterfield

Rocha

Butterfield

(2010) The Dynamics of Family Policy: Analysis and Advocacy. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.

Carter

Kolenc

(2005) “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”: Has the policy met its goals? University of Dayton Law Review 31(1): 2–16.

Chapman

(2007) Constructing the moral landscape through antidiscrimination law: Discourse, debate, and dialogue of sexual citizenship in three Florida communities. Doctoral Dissertation, Florida State University, Dissertations & Theses: A&I database. Publication No. AAT 3301533.

Chauncey

(2004) What gay studies taught the court: The historians’ amicus brief in Lawrence v. Texas. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 10(3): 509–538.

D’Emilio

(1998) Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Di Mauro

(2001) Regulation: Sexual behavior. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767045502 (accessed 1 October 2011).

Escoffier

(1985) Sexual revolution and the politics of gay identity. Socialist Review 15(4): 126–196.

10.

Ferguson

(2010) Review of the book Unfriendly fire: How the gay ban undermines the military and threatens America. Journal of Homosexuality 57(1): 191–195.

11.

Focus on the Family (2008) About us. Available at: http://www.focusonthefamily.com/about_us.aspx (accessed 1 October 2008).

12.

Frank

(2009) Unfriendly Fire: How the Gay Ban Undermines the Military and Threatens America. New York: St. Martin's Press.

13.

Galligan

Burgess

(2005) Moving rivers, shifting streams: Perspectives on the existence of a policy window. Arts Education Policy Review 107(2): 3–11.

14.

Goodale

(2012) Obama vs. Romney 101: 4 ways they differ on gay issues. Christian Science Monitor. Available at: http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/DC-Decoder/2012/0902/Obama-vs.-Romney-101-4-ways-they-differ-on-gay-issues/Same-sex-marriage (accessed 15 March 2013).

15.

Grindley

(2012) Tammy Baldwin reacts with rally call to Obama's executive order decision. The Advocate . Available at: http://www.advocate.com/business/2012/04/16/tammy-baldwin-reacts-rally-cry-obama-executive-order-decision (accessed 15 March 2013).

16.

Halley

(1999) Don’t: A Reader’s Guide to the Military’s Anti-gay Policy. London: Duke University Press.

17.

Herek

(2007) Confronting sexual stigma and prejudice: Theory and practice. Journal of Social Issues 63(4): 905–925.

18.

Howlett

(1998) Predictable and unpredictable policy windows: Institutional and exogenous correlates of Canadian federal agenda-setting. Canadian Journal of Political Science 31(3): 495–523.

19.

Human Rights Campaign (2009) The state of the workplace for lesbians, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans 2007-2008. Available at: http://www.hrc.org/documents/HRC_Foundation_State_of_the_Workplace_2007-2008.pdf (accessed 15 October 2011).

20.

Human Rights Campaign (2012) Statewide laws and employment policies. Available at: http://www.hrc.org/files/assets/resources/Employment_Laws_and_Policies.pdf (accessed 15 March 2013).

21.

Johnson

(2004) The Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Government. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Kingdon

(2003) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: Longman.

23.

Knight

Ervin

(2002) Talking points: The Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Culture and Family Institute, An affiliate of Concerned Women for America. Retrieved from: http://www.cultureandfamily.org/articledisplay.aspid=2578&department=FCI&categoryid=papers.

24.

Kovach

Millspaugh

(1996) Employment Nondiscrimination Act: On the cutting edge of public policy. Business Horizons 39(4): 65–74.

25.

Laraway

Jennings

(2002) Health Insurance Flexibility and Accountability Demonstration Initiative (HIFA): A policy analysis using Kingdon’s policy streams model. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice 3(4): 358–366.

26.

Lasala

(2006) Cognitive and environmental interventions for gay males: Addressing stigma and its consequences. Families in Society 87(2): 181–189.

27.

Lind

(2004) Legislating the family: Heterosexist bias in social welfare policy frameworks. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 31(4): 21–36.

28.

Lynch

(2008) Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell revisited: Debunking the unit-cohesion rationale for the continuing exclusion of gays from the military. University of Louisville Law Review 47(2): 391–408.

29.

National Association of Social Workers (2005) National committee on lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender issues. Available at: http://www.socialworkers.org/governance/cmtes/nclgbi.asp (accessed 1 October 2011).

30.

National Gay and Lesbian Taskforce (2008) Task Force’s work to end discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans. Available at: http://www.thetaskforce.org/issues/nondiscrimination/timeline (accessed 15 November 2009).

31.

National Gay and Lesbian Taskforce (2012) Testimony of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Action Fund. Available at: http://www.thetaskforce.org/downloads/release_materials/TF_enda_testimony_061112.pdf (accessed 15 January 2013).

32.

National Network for Social Work Managers (2004) Leadership and management practice standards. Available at: https://www.socialworkmanager.org/standards.php (accessed 1 October 2011).

33.

Obama

(2009) Remarks by the president at human rights campaign dinner. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-human-rights-campaign-dinner (accessed 15 October 2010).

34.

Ottosson

(2006) Wrap up survey on the laws worldwide affecting gay, lesbian, and transgendered people. Available at: http://www.asylumlaw.org/docs/sexualminorities/Legal%20Wrap%20Up%20Survey.pdf (accessed 15 October 2011).

35.

Ottosson

(2010) State sponsored homophobia: A world survey of laws prohibiting same sex activity between consenting adults. Available at: http://ilga.org/ilga/en/article/1161 (accessed 15 October 2011).

36.

OutServe-SLDN (2013) #DOMAisDead: Supreme Court rules 1996 law discriminatory and unconstitutional. Available at: http://outservemag.com/2013/06/domaisdead/ (accessed 15 July 2013).

37.

Rivera

(1999) Our straight-laced judges: Twenty years later. Hastings Law Journal 50: 1179–1198.

38.

Rudin

(2012) Halfway out: Why America's sexual minorities deserve better than the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Journal Of Workplace Rights 16 (3/4): 337–351.

39.

Servicemembers Legal Defense Network (2011) SLDN statement on 2010 DADT discharge numbers. Available at: http://www.sldn.org/news/arhives/sdln-statement-on-2010-dadt-discharge-numbers (accessed 12 September 2012).

40.

Sinclair

(2009) Homosexuality and the military: A review of the literature. Journal of Homosexuality 56(6): 701–718.

41.

Society for Human Resource Management (2012) ‘ENDA Order’ awaits president’s signature. Available at: http://www.shrm.org/legalissues/federalresources/pages/endaorder.aspx (accessed 1 September 2012).

42.

Sullivan

(2013) Meet the four Republicans in Congress who support gay marriage. Washington Post . Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/02/meet-the-four-congressional-republicans-who-support-gay-marriage/ (accessed 15 May 2013).

43.

Zahariadis

(2007) An assessment of the multiple streams framework: Structure, limitations, prospects. In: Sabatier

(ed) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview, pp.65–92.