In political and popular debates, bans on the wearing of Islamic head scarves and veils are often said to be necessary for the promotion of gender equality. In this article, I argue that this is based on a stereotypical view of Islam and of Muslim women which ignores the many different reasons why women wear headscarves and veils. I also argue that bans are unnecessary and even counterproductive to achieving gender equality. For those women who wear these garments because they freely choose to do so, bans are not necessary to promote their equality. For those women who are pressured into wearing headscarves or veils, bans could well work against promoting their equality, because they could prevent them from getting an education and a job and could lead to their isolation from society.
BlairA (2005) Case commentary: R (SB) v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School – human rights and religious dress in schools. Child and Family Law Quarterly17(3): 399–413.
4.
BousettaHJacobsD (2006) Multiculturalism, citizenship and Islam in problematic encounters in Belgium. In: ModoodTTriandafyllidouARicard Zapata-BarreroR (eds) Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship: A European Approach. London/New York: Routledge, pp.23–36.
Chambre des Représentants de Belgique (2011) DCO 53 0219/004. Proposition de Loi Visant à Interdire le Port de Tout Vêtement Cachant Totalement ou de Manière Principale le Visage. 18 April 2011. Available at: www.dekamer.be/FLWB/PDF/53/0219/53K0219004.pdf(accessed 16 September 2012).
DaviesG (2006) (Not yet) taking rights seriously: the House of Lords in Begum v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School. Human Rights and Human Welfare Working Papers37. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=945319(accessed 16 September 2012).
EdwardsS (2010) Defacing Muslim women: dialectical meanings of dress in the body politic. In: BanakerR (ed.) Rights in Context: Law and Justice in Late Modern Society. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate, pp.127–145.
15.
EvansC (2006) The ‘Islamic scarf’ in the European Court of Human Rights. Melbourne Journal of International Law7(1): 52. Available at: www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbJIL/2006/4.html(accessed 16 September 2012).
16.
FreedmanJ. (2007) Women, Islam and rights in Europe: beyond a universalist/culturalist dichotomy. Review of International Studies33: 29–44.
17.
GaspardFKhosrokhavarF (1995) Le Foulard et la République. Paris: La Découverte.
18.
GerelukD (2008) Symbolic Clothing in Schools: What Should Be Worn and Why. London: Continuum.
19.
GiesL (2006) What not to wear: Islamic dress and school uniforms. Feminist Legal Studies14: 377–389.
GrilloRShahP (2012) Reasons to Ban? The Anti-Burqa Movement in Western Europe. MMG Working Paper 12-05, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity. Available at: www.mmg.mpg.de/workingpapers(accessed 16 September 2012).
HowardE (2009) School bans on the wearing of religious symbols: examining the implications of recent case law from the UK. Religion and Human Rights4:7–24.
25.
HowardE (2012) Law and the Wearing of Religious Symbols: European Bans on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Education. London: Routledge.
Hunter-HeninM (2011) Why the French don’t like the burqa: laïcite, national identity and religious freedom. International and Comparative Law Quarterly61(3): 613–639.
JoppkeC (2009) Veil: Mirror of Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31.
KillianC (2003) The other side of the veil: North African women in France respond to the headscarf affair. Gender and Society17: 567–590.
32.
LanglaudeS (2006) Indoctrination, secularism, religious liberty, and the ECHR. International and Comparative Law Quarterly55(4): 929–944.
33.
ListerRWilliamsF AnttonenA (2007) Gendered Citizenship in Western Europe: New Challenges for Citizenship Research in a Cross-National Context. Bristol: Policy Press.
34.
LoenenT (2009) The headscarf debate: approaching the intersection of sex, religion and race under the European Convention on Human Rights and EC equality law. In: SchiekDChegeV (eds) European Union Non-Discrimination Law: Comparative Perspectives on Multidimensional Equality Law. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, pp.313–328.
35.
LyonDSpiniD (2004) Unveiling the headscarf debate. Feminist Legal Studies12: 333–345.
36.
McGoldrickD (2006) Human Rights and Religion: The Islamic Headscarf Debate in Europe. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
37.
MahonyH (2010) French constitution experts approve burqa ban. 8 October. Available at: http://euobserver.com/9/30993?print=1(accessed 16 September 2012).
38.
MahlmannM (2003) Religious tolerance, pluralist society and the neutrality of the state: the Federal Constitutional Court’s decision in the Headscarf Case. German Law Journal4(11): 1099–1116.
39.
MarshallJ (2006) Freedom of religious expression and gender equality: Sahin v Turkey. Modern Law Review69(3): 452–461.
40.
MarshallJ (2008) Women’s right to autonomy and identity in European human rights law: manifesting one’s religion. Res Publica14(3): 177–192.
41.
Mazher IdrissM (2005) Laïcité and the banning of the ‘hijab’ in France. Legal Studies25(2): 260–295.
42.
Mission d’Information sur la Pratique du Port du Voile Integral sur la Territoire National (2010) Report submitted to the President of the French National Assembly, 26/01/2010, JCP 2010.
43.
MouritsenP (2006) The particular universalism of a Nordic civic nation: common values, state religion and Islam in Danish popular culture. In: ModoodTTriandafyllidouAZapata-BarreroR (eds) Multiculturalism, Muslims and Citizenship: A European Approach. London: Routledge, pp.70–93.
PimorA (2006) The interpretation and protection of Article 9 ECHR: overview of the Denbigh High School (UK) Case. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law28(3–4): 323–345.
RoriveI (2009) Religious symbols in the public space: in search of an European answer. Cardozo Law Review30(6): 2669–2698.
51.
RoseberryL (2009) Religion, ethnicity and gender in the Danish headscarf debate. In: SchiekDChegeV (eds) European Union Non-Discrimination Law: Comparative Perspectives on Multidimensional Equality Law. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, pp.329–352.
52.
SacksofskyU (2009) Religion and equality in Germany: the headscarf debate from a constitutional perspective. In: SchiekDChegeV (eds) European Union Non-Discrimination Law: Comparative Perspectives on Multidimensional Equality Law. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, pp.353–370.
53.
SchiekD (2004) Just a piece of cloth? German courts and employees with headscarves. Industrial Law Journal33(1): 68–73.
54.
SkjeieH (2007) Headscarves in schools: European comparisons. In: LoenenTGoldschmidtJ (eds) Religious Pluralism and Human Rights in Europe: Where to Draw the Line?Antwerp: Intersentia, pp.129–145.
55.
VakulenkoA (2007) Islamic headscarves' and the European Convention on Human Rights: an intersectional perspective. Social and Legal Studies16: 183–199.
56.
Van der SchyffGOverbeekeA (2011) Exercising religious freedom in the public space: a comparative and European Convention analysis of general burqa bans. European Constitutional Law Review7(3): 424–452.
VrielinkJOuald ChaibSBremsE (2011) Het ‘boerkaverbod’ in Belgie (The ‘burqa ban’ in Belgium). Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Mensenrechten36(6/7): 623–638.
59.
WeilP (2004) Lifting the veil of ignorance. Progressive Politics3(1): 16–22.
60.
WilesE (2007) Headscarves, human rights, and harmonious multicultural society: implications of the French ban for the interpretations of equality. Law and Society Review41(3): 699–736.
