This article analyses the development of a fundamental right to equal treatment or to non-discrimination within the EU legal order through a study of the general principles of Community law, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the Article 13 EC Equality Directives. It examines European Union legislation and case law of the European Court of Justice, including the opinions of the Advocates General and the Court of First Instance, in relation to the principle of equality or equal treatment to determine whether they support the existence of a fundamental right to equality before the law and to nondiscrimination. The equality clauses of international instruments are reviewed as aid in this analysis. Despite the fact that the sources discussed appear to establish a right to equality before the law or to non-discrimination, the limitations to the material and personal scope of these sources means that this right is, as yet, not a fundamental, universal right within the EU legal order.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnardC. (2001) ‘The Changing Scope of the Fundamental Principle of Equality?’ McGill Law Journal, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 955–77.
2.
BarrettG. (2003) ‘The Concept and Principle of Equality in European Community Law — Pouring New Wine in Old Bottles?’ CostelloC.BarryE.Equality in Diversity The New Equality Directives, 99–134, Irish Centre for European Law/Irish Equality Authority/Ashfield Publishing, Dublin, pp. 118–20.
3.
BellM. (2002) Anti-Discrimination Law and the European Union, Oxford, University Press, Oxford.
4.
BellM. (2003) ‘The Right to Equality and Non-Discrimination’, HerveyT.KennerJ.Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights — A Legal Perspective, Hart Publishing, Oxford/Portland, Oregon, pp. 91–110.
5.
BettenL.GriefN. (1998) EU Law and Human Rights, Longman, London/New York.
6.
BrownC. (2002) ‘The Race Directive: Towards Equality for All the Peoples of Europe?’ Yearbook of European Law, Vol. 21, pp. 195–227.
7.
BurcaG. de (1997) ‘The Role of Equality in Community Law’, DashwoodA.O'LearyS.The Principle of Equal Treatment in EC Law, Sweet and Maxwell, London, pp. 13–34.
8.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union [2000] O.J. C364/1.
9.
COM (2000) 644, Communication from the Commission on the Legal Nature of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
10.
COM (2008) 426, Proposal for a Council Directive on Implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Persons Irrespective of Religion or Belief, Disability, Age or Sexual Orientation.
11.
12.
Council Decision 2000/750/EC of 27/11/2000 establishing a Community Action Programme to combat Discrimination (2001 to 2006) [2000] O.J. L303/23.
13.
Council Regulation (EC) 168/2007 of 15/02/2007 establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights [2007] O.J. L53/1.
14.
Directive 76/207/EEC on the Implementation of the Principle of Equal Treatment for Men and Women as Regards Access to Employment, Vocational Training and Promotion, and Working Conditions [1976] O.J. L39/40.
15.
Directive 2000/43/EC implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Persons irrespective of Racial or Ethnic Origin [2000] O.J. L180/22.
16.
Directive 2000/78/EC establishing a General Framework for Equal Treatment in Employment and Occupation [2000] O.J. L303/16.
17.
Directive 2002/73/EC amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC [2002] O.J. L269/15.
18.
Directive 2004/113/EC implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Men and Women in the Access to and the Supply of Goods and Services [2004] O.J. L373/37.
19.
Directive 2006/54/EC on the Implementation of the Principle of Equal Opportunities and Equal Treatment of Men and Women in Matters of Employment and Occupation (recast) [2006] O.J. L204/23.
20.
DrzemczewskiP. (2001) ‘The Council of Europe's Position with Respect to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’, Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1–4, pp. 14–31.
21.
EllisE. (2002) ‘The Principle of Non-Discrimination in the Post-Nice Era’, ArnullA.WincottD.Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 291–305.
22.
EllisE. (2005) EU Anti-Discrimination Law, University Press, Oxford, Oxford.
23.
European Commission, DG for Employment and Social Affairs (2003) Annual Report on Equality and Non-discrimination. Towards Diversity.
24.
GriefN. (2002) ‘Non-Discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights: A Critique of the United Kingdom Government's Refusal to Sign and Ratify Protocol 12’, European Law Review, Vol. 27, Human Rights Survey, pp. HR/3–HR/18.
25.
HeppleB. (2001) ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’, Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 225–30.
26.
HoskingD. (2007) ‘A High Bar for EU disability Rights’, Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 36, No. 2, 228–37.
27.
HowardE. (2008) ‘The European Year of Equal Opportunities for All — 2007: is the EU moving away from a Formal Idea of Equality?’ European Law Journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 168–85.
JacobsF. (2002) ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’, ArnullA.WincottD.Accountability and Legitimacy in the European Union, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 275–90.
30.
KrebberS. (2006) ‘The Social Rights Approach of the European Court of Justice to enforce European Employment Law’, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 377–404.
31.
KrugerH.PolakiewiczJ. (2001), ‘Proposals for a Coherent Human Rights Protection System in Europe’, Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1–4, 1–13.
32.
LieglB.PerchingB.WeyssB. (2004) Combating Religious and Ethnic Discrimination in Employment From the EU and International Perspective, European Network Against Racism, Vienna.
33.
MahoneyP. (2002) ‘The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights from the Perspective of the European Convention’, Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 23, No. 8–12, pp. 300–3.
34.
McCruddenC. (2007) Buying Social Justice: Equality, Government Procurement and Legal Change, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35.
McInerneyS. (2003) ‘Legal Protection against Discrimination based on Racial or Ethnic Origin under European Union Law — Necessary but not Sufficient?’ International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, Vol.6, pp. 3–43.
36.
MoreG. (1999) ‘The Principle of Equal Treatment: From Market Unifier to Fundamental Right?’ CraigP.BurcaG. de, The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 517–52.
37.
O'HareU. (2001) ‘Enhancing European Equality Rights: A New Regional Framework’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 133–65.
38.
SchiekD. (2006) ‘The ECJ Decision in Mangold: A further twist of Effects of Directives and Constitutional Relevance of Community Equality Legislation’, Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 329–41.
39.
SchmidtM. (2006) ‘The Mangold Case before the European Court of Justice’, German Law Journal, Vol. 7, No. 5, www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=728 (accessed 26 July 2008).
40.
SchokkenbroekJ. (2000) ‘Towards Stronger European Protection against Discrimination: The Preparation of a New Additional Protocol to the European Convention of Human Rights’, MoonG.Race Discrimination. Developing and Using a New Legal Framework, Justice/Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, pp. 29–39.
TridimasT. (1999) The General Principles of EC Law, University Press, Oxford, Oxford.
43.
TysonA. (2001) ‘The Negotiation of the European Community Directive on Racial Discrimination’, European Journal of Migration and Law, Vol. 3, pp. 199–229.
44.
UsherJ. (1998) General Principles of European Community Law, Longman, London/New York.
45.
WaddingtonL. (2003) The Expanding Role of the Equality Principle in European Union Law, Policy Paper, European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies, www.iue.it/RSCAS?e-texts/CR2003-04.pdf (accessed 26 July 2008).
46.
WaddingtonL. (2007) ‘Case C-13/05, Chacon Navas v. Eurest Colectividades SA’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 2, 487–99.
Archer Daniels Midland Company and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd. v. Commission, Case T-224/00, [2003] ECR II-2597.
49.
Joseph Baldinger v. Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter, Case 386/02, Opinion 11 December 2003, (AG Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer).
50.
Booker Aquaculture Ltd trading as Marine Harvest McConnell and Hydro Seafood GSP Ltd v. The Scottish Ministers, Cases C20/00 and 64/00, Opinion 20 September 2001, (AG Mischo).
51.
Chacon Navas v. Eurest Colectividades SA, Case C-13/05, [2006] ECR I-6467.
52.
Commission v. Italy, Case 87/02, Opinion 8 January 2004, (AG Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer).
53.
Council v. Heidi Hautala, Case 353/99, [2001] ECR 1–9565, (AG Leger).
54.
D and Kingdom of Sweden v. Council, Case 122/99 and C125/99, [2001] ECR 1–4319, (AG Mischo).
55.
Defrenne v. Sabena No. 3, Case 149/77, [1978] ECR 1365.
56.
Rita Frilli v. Belgium, Case 1/72, [1972] ECR 457.
57.
Jego Quere & Cie SA v. Commission, Case T-177/01, [2002] ECR II-2365.
58.
Kjell Karlsson and Others, Case 292/97, [2000] ECR 1–2737.
59.
Kunqian Catherine Zhu and Man Lavette Chen v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, Case 200/02, Opinion 18 May 2004, (AG Tizzano).
60.
Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co. Ltd. and Kyowa Hakko Europe GmbH v. Commission, Case T-223/00, [2003] ECR II-2553.
61.
Mangold v. Helm, Case 144/04, [2005] ECRI-9981.
62.
max.mobil Telekornmunikation Service GmbH v. Commission, Case T-54/99, [2002] ECR II-313.
63.
Nold v. Commission, Case 4/73, [1974] ECR 491.
64.
Omega Spielhallen und Automtenaufstellungs GmbH v. Oberburgemeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn, Case 36/02, Opinion 18 March 2004, (AG Stix-Hackl).
65.
P&O European Ferries (Vizcaya) SA and Diputacion Foral de Vizcaya v. Commission, Case T-116/01 and T-118/01, [2003] ECR II-2957.
66.
The Queen v. Secretary of State for Trade and Industry ex parte BECTU, Case 173/99, [2001] ECR I-4881, (AG Tizzano).
67.
Ruckdeschel and Another v. HZA Hamburg-St. Annen and Diamalt AG v. HZA Itzehoe, Joined Cases 117/76 and 16/77, [1977] ECR 1753.
68.
Tadao Maruko v. Versorgungsanstalt der Deutschen Buhnen, Opinion 6 September 2007, Case 267/06, (AG Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer).
69.
TNT Traco SpA v. Poste Italiane SpA and others, Case 340/99, [2001] ECR I-4109, (AG Alber).
70.
Tokai Carbon Co. Ltd. and Others v. Commission, Cases T-236/01, T-239/01, T-244/01 to T-246/01, T-252/01 and T-252/01, Judgment 29 April 2004.
71.
Z v. European Parliament, Case 270/99, [2001] ECR I-9197, (AG Jacobs).
