The imposition since 1998 of a variety of positive equality duties upon public authorities has attracted comparatively little academic attention. However, these duties are a central part of current government equality initiatives, increasingly constitute a major part of the work of the UK's equality commissions, and have been described as an essential part of a new ‘fourth generation’ of equality legislation. It now appears likely that a positive duty to promote gender equality will soon be imposed upon public authorities, which will complement similar race and disability duties. Will the introduction of this positive gender equality duty add to, detract or complement existing statutory provisions? Given the danger that ‘soft law’ initiatives may undermine existing anti-discrimination controls, will the duty provide a clear steer to public authorities, or will it lack teeth, substance and direction, and possibly even prove counter-productive?
Such positive duties are designed to compensate for the limitations of existing anti-discrimination law, by requiring the taking of positive steps to promote equality and eliminate discrimination, rather than just compelling a reactive compliance with the letter of the (equality) law. The justifications in principle for the introduction of such duties are strong: for the first time, the introduction of a positive gender duty will impose a clear legislative obligation upon public authorities to adopt a substantive equality approach and to take proactive action to redress patterns of disadvantage linked to gender discrimination. Serious concerns do however exist as to the extent to which such duties can be enforced, and the danger that they will simply encourage greater bureaucratic activity at the expense of real change. The proposed gender duty, as with the other duties that have been introduced, is no panacea. Nevertheless, it does constitute a good start, can serve a useful function by empowering public authorities to take positive action, and if effectively used will be a very valuable point of pressure to push for better things.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson E..What is the Point of Equality?.Ethics. 1999;109:287-338
2.
Beck J. H.,Reitz J. G.,Weiner N..Addressing Systematic Racial Discrimination in Employment: The Health Canada Case and Implications of Legislative Change.Canadian Public Policy. 2002;28 (3): 373-394
3.
Review of Anti-Discrimination Legislation. 1999;:
4.
Beveridge F.,Nott S.,Stephen K..Making Women Count in the United Kingdom.Making Women Count. 1999;:
5.
Bownes G..Snakes and Ladders: Advice and Support for Discrimination Cases in Wales. 2003;:
6.
ChaneyP.FevreR. (2002) An Absolute Duty: Equal Opportunities and the National Assembly for Wales. EOC: Cardiff. Available at http://www.eoc.org.ukjcsengjabouteocjabsolute_duty_fr.pdf (last accessed 12 December 2004).
7.
Chaney P.,Fevre R..An Absolute Duty: Equal Opportunities and the National Assembly for Wales. 2002;:
8.
Caruso D..Limits of the Classic Method: Positive Action in the European Union After the New Equality Directives.Harvard International Law Journal. 2003;:331
9.
Statutory Code of Practice on the Duty to Promote Race Equality. 2002;:
10.
Public Procurement and Race Equality: Guidelines for Public Authorities. 2003a;:
11.
Elections and the Duty to Promote Race Equality. 2004;:
12.
CRE Press Release, ‘Speed Up Progress on Race Equality or Face the Penalty’, 16 November 2004. CRE: London.
13.
CRE/Schneider Ross (2003) Towards Racial Equality. CRE: London, executive summary available at www.cre.gov.uk
14.
Delivering Equality for Disabled Persons. 2004;:
15.
DonaghyT. (2002) ‘Mainstreaming: Northern Ireland's Participative Democratic Approach', paper presented to the Jubilee Conference of the Australian Political Studies Association, October 2002, available at (last accessed 10 January 2004).
16.
Full Report on the Implementation of the Section 75 Equality and Good Relations Duties by Public Authorities 1 January 2000–31 March 2002. Belfast: ECNI;
17.
Guide to the Statutory Duties. Belfast: ECNI; 2000:
18.
Report on the Implementation of the Section 75 Statutory Duties, 1 April 2002–31 March 2003. Belfast: ECNI; 2004:
19.
Escott K.,Whitfield D.Promoting Gender Equality in the Public Sector. Manchester: Centre for Public Services/EOC; 2002:
20.
Fredman S..Reversing Discrimination.. 1997;:
21.
Freeman A.1982 Anti-Discrimination Law: A Critical Reflection.. 1982;96:97
22.
Fredman S.Discrimination Law. Oxford: OUP; 2001:
23.
Fredman S.,Szyszczak E.Discrimination: The Limits of the Law. London: Mansell; 1992:
24.
Frase-Blunt M..‘Thwarting the Diversity Backlash: Develop an Inclusive Plan that Highlights the Bottom-line Effect and Benefits to all Employees’, 48(6).Human Resources Magazine. 2003;137–138:141-144
25.
Glaze B..Context and Interpretation in Anti-Discrimination Law.Melbourne University LR 18. 2002;:
26.
Harlow C.,Rawlings R.Law and Administration. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson; 1998:
27.
Harvey C. J..Governing After the Rights Revolution.Journal of Law and Society. 2000;27 (2): 61-97
Hepple B.Age as An Equality Issue. Fredman S.Spencer S., ed. Oxford: Hart; 2003:
30.
Hepple B.,Coussey M.,Choudhury T.Equality: A New Framework, Report of the Independent Review of the Enforcement of UK Anti-Discrimination Legislation,. Oxford: Hart; 2000:
31.
Hutson N.PAFT in Northern Ireland — A Contribution to the Debate on Mainstreaming Equality. Belfast: Standing Advisory Commission on Human Rights; 1996:
32.
Miller F.,Bilson K.Learning from Experience: Lessons in Mainstreaming Equal Opportunities. Edinburgh: Institute of Governance, University of Edinburgh; 2003:
33.
Kymlicka W.,Norman W..Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Citizenship Theory.Ethics. 1994;:
34.
Lacey N..From Individual to Group’, in Hepple and Szyszczak.Discrimination: The Limits of the Law. :102-3
35.
Lawrence C..The Id, the Ego and Equal protection: Reckoning with Unconscious Racism.. 1987;:317
36.
Election Meetings: Use of School and Community Premises, 29 March 2004. London: LGiU; 2004:
37.
Macpherson Sir William.The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry: Report of an Inquiry. 1999;:
38.
Menkel-Meadow C..The Trouble With the Adversary System in a Postmodern, Multicultural World.. 1996;5:
39.
Miller F.,Bolzon K.Learning from Experience: Lessons in Mainstreaming Equal Opportunities. Edinburgh: Institute of Governance, University of Edinburgh; 2003:
40.
Mills G..Combating Institutional Racism in the Public Sector.ILJ. 2002;31:96-98
41.
Mirza H. S.,Sheridan A.Black and Ethnic Minority Women: Understanding Identity, Access and Equality in the Health Service. EOC: Manchester; 2003:
42.
Morris P. E..‘Legal Regulation of Contract Compliance: An Anglo-American Comparison’ (1991) 19.Anglo-American Law Review. 1991;:87-144
43.
McColgan A.Discrimination Law Handbook. London: Legal Action Group; 2002:
44.
McCrudden C.Human Rights. Harvey C. J., ed. Oxford: Hart; 2001:
45.
McCrudden C.English Public Law. Feldman D., ed. Oxford: OUP; 2003:581-668.
46.
McCrudden C.,Ford R.,Heath A..Legal Regulation of Affirmative Action in Northern Ireland: An Empirical Assessment.OJLS. 2004;24 (3): 363-415
47.
McCrudden C.Equal Rights and Human Rights Their Role in Peace Building 11–23. Belfast: Belfast: Committee on the Administration of Justice; 1999:
48.
McCrudden C.Ethnic Pluralism and Public Policy. Glazer N.Young K., ed. London: Treasury; 1983:
49.
McCrudden C.Mainstreaming Fairness?A Discussion Paper on Policy Appraisal and Fair Treatment. Belfast: Committee for the Administration of Justice; 1996:
Mullally S..Mainstreaming Equality in Ireland: A Fair and Inclusive Accommodation for all.Legal Studies. 2001;21 (1): 99
52.
Delivering Public Services to a Diverse Society. London: NAO; 2004:
53.
Nott S.Making Women Count: Integrating Gender into Law and Policy-making. Beveridge F.Nott S.Stephen K., ed. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2000:
54.
Osborne R. D..Progressing the Equality Agenda in Northern Ireland.Journal of Social Policy. 2003;339–360:348
55.
Osborne R.,Gallagher A.,Cormack R.,Shortall S..The Implementation of the Policy Appraisal and Fair Treatment Guidelines in Northern Ireland.Policy Aspects of Employment Equality in Northern Ireland. 1996;:127-52
56.
O'BrienN. (2004), ‘“Accentuating the Positive”: Disability Rights and the Idea of a Commission for Equality and Human Rights’, paper delivered at the Industrial Law Society, Oxford, 10 September 2004; available at http://www.industriallawsociety.org.uk/papers/obrien-outline.htm (last accessed 13 December 2004).
Palmer E..Resource Allocation, Welfare Rights — Mapping the Boundaries of Judicial Control in Public Administrative Law.Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2000;20 (1): 63>-88
64.
Phillips A..Defending Equality of Outcome.Journal of Political Philosophy. 2004;12 (1): 1>
Smart CarolFeminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge; 1989:
67.
Razavi S.,Miller C.New York: United Nations; 1995:
68.
Rees T.Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union. London: Routledge; 1998:
69.
ReesT. (2004) ‘Reflections Upon the Uneven Development of Gender Mainstreaming’, paper presented to the ESCR Gender Mainstreaming Seminar, Leeds, May 2004; Status Women Canada (2001); Canadian Experience in Gender Mainstreaming, Status of Women Canada, Ottawa, available at http://collection.nlc-bnc.ca/l00/200/301/swc-cfc/cdn_experience_gender-e/020319-international-e.pdf (last accessed 10 January 2005).
70.
Reaume D..Harm and Fault in Discrimination Law: The Transition from Intentional to Adverse Effect Discrimination.Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 2001;2:349
71.
Rhode D..The “No-Problem” Problem: Feminist Challenges and Cultural Change.Yale LJ. 1991;100:1731
72.
Savoie D..What is Wrong with the New Public Management?.Canadian Public Administration. 1995;38 (1): 112-121
73.
Thornton M..The Liberal Promise: Anti-Discrimination Legislation in Australia. 1990;:
74.
Equality Statement. :
75.
Ethnic Minorities and the Labour Market. 2002;:
76.
. 1995;:
77.
Woodward A. E..Gender Mainstreaming in European Policy: Innovation or Deception?. 2001;:
78.
Women and Equality Unit (2004) Commission for Equality and Human Rights: The Government Response to Consultation, para. 41. WEU: London, available at http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/equalityjprojectjconsultation_govtresponse_nov2004.doc (last accessed 11 January 2005).
79.
Young I. M..Justice and the Politics of Difference. 1990;:
80.
Young I. M.Equality of Whom.Journal of Political Philosophy. 2001;9:1-18
