Legislation against racial discrimination makes, it is argued, a clear statement against racism in all its forms and hence has symbolic value. This is expressed in different ways, for example: a declaration of firm opposition to racism; the sending out of a clear political signal regarding the commitment to the fight against racism; a powerful symbol and a statement of intent. This Article will argue that the European Union's Race Directive1 had, at the time of its adoption, significant symbolic value because it made a clear and unequivocal statement to the Union's citizens, to its Member States and to the wider world, that the Union was committed to the elimination of racism and racial discrimination. The plans for enlargement of the European Union, with a number of States joining in 2004, added to the value of the statement: it signalled to these new Member States that the Union expects them to combat racism and racial or ethnic discrimination and to promote and adopt effective measures against such discrimination in line with the Race Directive, as this has become part of the Acquis Communautaire, the body of law that must be adopted by all States wishing to join. But does the Race Directive today, after the deadline for its implementation has passed, still have any symbolic value?
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllottA. (1980) The Limits of Law, Chapter 6, 161–237. Butterworths; London.
2.
BantonM. (1994) Discrimination, Open University Press.
3.
BarnardC. (1999) Article 13: Through the Looking Glass of Union Citizenship. In Legal Issues of the Amsterdam Treaty (O'KeeffeD.TwomeyP. (eds.) 375–95. Hart Publishing; Oxford.
4.
BellM.WaddingtonL. (1996) The 1996 Intergovernmental Conference and the Prospects of a Non-Discrimination Treaty Article. Industrial Law Journal25, 4, 320–36.
5.
BellM. (1999) The New Article 13 EC: A Sound Basis for ED Anti-Discrimination Law?Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 6, 5–24.
6.
BellM. (2000) Equality and Diversity: Anti-Discrimination Law after Amsterdam. In Social Law and Policy in an evolving European Union (ShawJ. (ed.), 157–71. Hart Publishing; Oxford.
7.
BellM. (2001) Meeting the Challenge? A Comparison between the ED Racial Equality Directive and the Starting Line. In The Starting Line and the Incorporation of the Racial Equality Directive into the National Laws of the EU Member States and Accession States, ChopinI.NiessenJ. (eds.) 22–54. Belmont Press; Brussels/London.
8.
BellM. (2002a) Combating Racism Through European Laws: A Comparison of the Racial Equality Directive and Protocol 12. In Combating Racial and Ethnic Discrimination. Taking the European Legislative Agenda Further, (ChopinI.NiessenJ. (eds.), 7–34. Migration Policy Group and CRE; Brussels/London.
9.
BellM. (2002b) Anti-Discrimination Law and the European Union. Oxford University Press.
10.
BindmanG. (1996) When will Europe Act Against Racism?European Human Rights Law Review2, 143–9.
11.
BrownC. (2002) The Race Directive: Towards Equality for All the Peoples of Europe?Yearbook of European Law, 21, 195–227.
12.
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, [2000] OJ C364:1.
13.
ChopinI.NiessenJ. (eds.) (1998) Proposals for Legislative Measures to Combat Racism and to Promote Equal Rights in the European Union. CRE; London.
14.
ChopinI. (1999a) Campaigning against Racism and Xenophobia: from a Legislative Perspective at European Level. ENAR, Brussels. The New Starting Line Proposal is annexed to this.
15.
ChopinI. (1999a) The Starting Line Group: A Harmonized Approach to Fight Racism and to Promote Equal Treatment. European Journal of Migration and Law1, 111–29.
16.
ChopinI.NiessenJ. (eds.) (2002) Combating Racial and Ethnic Discrimination. Taking the European Legislative Agenda further. Migration Policy Group and CRE; Brussels/London.
17.
Claude Moraes MEP launches a ‘Name and Shame’ League Table of Failure to implement new EU Race laws (2003) www.claudemoraes.net/articleI3transpose.html. This ‘Name and Shame League Table’ is available from the office of Claude Moraes, via the website above.
18.
Commission for Racial Equality (2000) Article 13 Proposals from the European Commission for Combating Discrimination,CRE); London. www.cre.gov.uk/legaladv/art13.html.
19.
Commission Report COM (1999) 268 on the Implementation of the European Year against Racism.
20.
Communication COM (1999) 564 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on certain Community Measures to combat Discrimination, 25/11/1999.
21.
Concluding Observations of the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination on United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, CERD/C/63/CO/l1, 10 December 2003www.unhchr.ch/
22.
Council Decision 2000/750/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a Community Action Programme to combat Discrimination (2001 to 2006), [2000] OJ L303:23–28.
23.
Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the Implementation of the Principle of Equal Treatment for Men and Women as regards Access to Employment, Vocational Training and Promotion, and Working Conditions, [1976] OJ L39:40–2.
24.
Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Persons irrespective of Racial or Ethnic Origin, [2000] OJ L180:22–6.
25.
Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general Framework for Equal Treatment in Employment and Occupation, [2000] OJ L303:16–22.
26.
Council of Europe (1991) Final report of the Community Relations Project “Community and Ethnic relations in Europe”, MG-CR (91) 1 Final E. Strasbourg.
27.
CurtinD.GeurtsM. (1996) Race Discrimination and the European Union Anno 1996: From Rhetoric to Legal Remedy?Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights14, 2, 147–71.
28.
29.
Declaration by the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 16 December 1997 on Respecting Diversity and Combating Racism and Xenophobia, [1998] OJ C1: 1.
30.
31.
DinsdaleJ. (1997) Combating Discrimination: A View from the Council of Europe In Developments in Discrimination Law in Ireland and Europe. (ByrneR.DuncanW. eds.) 9–32. Irish Centre for European Law, Trinity College Dublin.
32.
Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EC on the Implementation of the Principle of Equal Treatment for Men and Women as Regards Access to Employment, Vocational Training and Promotion, and Working Conditions, [2002] OJ L269: 15–20.
33.
DummettA. (1994) The Starting Line: A Proposal for a Draft Council Directive concerning the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. Netv Community20, 3, 530–8.
34.
DuncanW. (1997) Racism, Discrimination and Amendment of the European Community Treaty and the Treaty on European Union. In Developments in Discrimination Law in Ireland and Europe.( ByrneR.DuncanW. eds.) 43–54. Irish Centre for European Law, Trinity College Dublin.
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (1997) Legal Measures to Combat Racism in de Member States of the Council of Europe. Council of Europe; Strasbourg.
41.
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (2001) Compilation of ECRI's General Policy Recommendations, CRI (2001) 7. Council of Europe; Strasbourg.
42.
European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (2003) General Policy Recommendation 7, National Legislation to Combat Racism and Racial Discrimination.Council of Europe; Strasbourg.
43.
European Commission, Directorate-General Employment, Industrial Relations and Social Affairs (1996) V/6188/97 - EN, Legal Instruments to combat Racism and Xenophobia.
44.
European Council Consultative Commission on Racism and Xenophobia Report (April 1995), Brussels, 6906/1/95, RAXEN 24 REV 1 (1995). www.eumc.eu.int.
45.
European Parliament Committee of Inquiry into the Rise of Fascism and Racism in Europe (1985) A2-0160/85, (Evrigenis Report).
46.
European Parliament Committee of Inquiry into the Rise of Fascism and Racism in Europe (1990) A3-0195/90, (Ford Report).
47.
European Social Agenda, approved at Nice, December 2000, [2000] OJ C157:412.
FredmanS. (ed.) (2001a) Discrimination and Human Rights The Case of Racism. Oxford University Press.
50.
FredmanS. (2001b) Equality: A New Generation?Industrial Law Journal30, 2, 145–68.
51.
FredmanS. (2002) Discrimination Law. Clarendon Law Series, Oxford University Press.
52.
GeartyC. (1999) The Internal and External ‘Other’ in the Union Legal Order: Racism, Religious Intolerance and Xenophobia in Europe. In The EU and Human Rights . (AlstonP. (ed.) 327–58. Oxford University Press.
53.
GoldstonJ. (2001) European Law: New Possibilities in the Fight against Discrimination. Interights Bulletin13, 3, 127–9.
54.
HeppleB.SzyszczakE. (eds.), (1992) Discrimination: The Limits of Law. Mansell; London.
55.
HeppleB.LesterLord A.EllisE.RoseD.SinghR. (1997) Improving Equality Law: The Options. JUSTICE; London.
56.
HeppleB.CousseyM.ChoudburyT. (2000) Equality: A new Framework, Report of the Independent Review of the Enforcement of UK Anti Discrimination Legislation. Hart Publishing; Oxford.
57.
HerveyT. (1999) Putting Europe's House in Order: Racism, Race Discrimination and Xenophobia after the Treaty of Amsterdam. In Legal Issues of the Amsterdam Treaty (O'KeeffeD.TwomeyP. (eds.) 329–50. Hart Publishing; Oxford.
Joint Action 96/443/JHA of 15 July 1996 adopted by the Council on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, concerning Action to combat Racism and Xenophobia, [1996] OJ L185:5–7.
60.
Joint Declaration of the Institutions against Racism and Xenophobia, [1986] OJ C158:1–3.
61.
JUSTICE (1997) The Union Divided. Race Discrimination and Third Country Nationals in the European Union. Hart Publishing; Oxford.
62.
Lester of Herne HillLord A. (1997) Making Discrimination Law Effective: Old Barriers and New Frontiers. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 2, 167–81.
63.
Lester of Herne HillLord A. (2000) New European Equality Measures, Public Law562–7.
64.
LustgartenL. (1986) Racial Inequality and the Limits of Law. Modern Law Review49, 68–85.
65.
LustgartenL.EdwardsJ. (1992) Racial Inequality and the Limits of Law. In Racism and Anti-Racism Inequalities, Opportunities and Policies . (BrahamP.RattansiA.SkellingtonR. (eds.) 270–93. Sage publication and Open University.
66.
LutchmanS. (1997) Combating Racism A View from the European Commission. In Developments in Discrimination Law in Ireland and Europe. (ByrneR.DuncanW. eds.) 33–42. Irish Centre for European Law, Trinity College Dublin.
67.
MacEwenM. (1995) Tackling Racism in Europe, An Examination of Anti-Discrimination Law in Practice. Berg; Oxford and Washington.
68.
McInerneyS. (2000) Equal Treatment between Persons irrespective of Racial or Ethnic Origin: a Comment. European Law Review25,317-23.
69.
McInerneyS. (2003) Legal Protection against Discrimination based on Racial or Ethnic Origin under European Union Law - Necessary but not Sufficient?International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 6, 3–43.
70.
Meier-WangM. (2001) Suggested Elements of an Effective Anti-Discrimination Law. Interights Bulletin, 13, 3, 130–1.
71.
NiessenJ. (2003) Making the Law Work The Enforcement and Implementation of Anti-Discrimination Legislation. European Journal of Migration and Law5, 2,249–254.
72.
O'HareU. (2001) Enhancing European Equality Rights: A New Regional Framework. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law8, 2, 13365.
Proposal COM (1988) 318 for a Council Resolution on the Fight against Racism and Xenophobia,[1988]OJ C214:32.
77.
Proposal COM (1995) 653 for a Council Decision designating 1997 as European Year against Racism, [1996]OJ C89:7.
78.
Proposal COM (1996) 615 for a Council Regulation (EC) establishing a European Monitoring Centre for Racism and Xenophobia, [1997]OJ C78:15.
79.
Proposal COM (1999) 565 for a Council Directive establishing a General Framework for Equal Treatment in Employment and Education, 25/11/1999.
80.
Proposal COM (1999) 566 for a Council Directive implementing the Principle of Equal Treatment between Persons irrespective of Racial or Ethnic Origin, 25/11/1999.
81.
Proposal COM (1999) 567 for a Council Decision establishing a Community Action Programme to combat Discrimination (2001–2006), 25/11/1999.
82.
Proposal COM (2001) 127 for a Council Directive concerning the Status of Third Country Nationals who are Long-Term Residents, [2001]OJ C240E:79–87.
83.
Proposal COM (2001) 664 for a Council Framework Decision on Combating Racism and Xenophobia, 28/11/2001.
84.
Report of the Race Relations Board, 1966 –1967, London, HMSO, 1967.
85.
Resolution of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 29 May 1990 on the Fight against Racism and Xenophobia, [1990] OJ C157:1–3.
86.
Resolution of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting in the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the European Year against Racism (1997), [1996]OJ C237:1.
87.
Resolution of the European Parliament on the Joint Declaration by the European Parliament, the Council, the Representatives of the Member States meeting within the Council, and the Commission against Racism and Xenophobia, [1986] OJC176:63.
88.
Resolution of the European Parliament on the Growing Number of Crimes Connected with Fascism, Racism and Xenophobia in the Community Countries, [1987] OJ C190: 108.
89.
Resolution of the European Parliament on the Joint Declaration against Racism and Xenophobia and an Action Programme by the Council of Ministers, [1989] OJ C69:40–3.
90.
Resolution of the European Parliament on Racism, Xenophobia and Anti-Semitism B4-261/94, [1994] OJ C323:154.
91.
Resolution of the European Parliament on Racism, Xenophobia and Anti-Semitism, [1995] OJ C308:140.
92.
Resolution of the European Parliament on Racism, Xenophobia and Anti-Semitism and on further Steps to combat Racial Discrimination, [1999] OJ C98:488.
93.
Resolution on Measures to Combat Racism and Xenophobia, [1990] OJ C175: 178.
94.
Resolution on Racism and Xenophobia, [1991] OJ C280:146.
95.
Resolution on Racism, Xenophobia and Anti-Semitism, [1992] OJ C305:590.
96.
Resolution on Racism and Xenophobia, [1993] OJ342:19.
97.
Resolution on Racism, Xenophobia and Anti-Semitism, [1995] OJ C126:75.
98.
Resolution on Racism, Xenophobia and the Extreme Right, [1997] OJ C85: 150.
99.
Resolution on the Report by the Committee of Inquiry into Racism and Xenophobia, [1990] OJ C284:57.
100.
Resolution on the Rise of Racism and Fascism in Europe, [1986] OJ C36:142–3.
101.
SierraM. (ed.), (2002) Towards Equal Treatment Transposing the Directive Analysis and Proposals. ENAR.
102.
SkidmoreP. (2001) EC Framework Directive on Equal Treatment in Employment: Towards a Comprehensive Community Anti-Discrimination Policy?Industrial Law Journal30, 1, 126–32.
