Despite most states' widespread adoption in the past 10 years of hate crime laws, researchers and policy-makers have been unable to measure the actual incidence or types of hate crimes being committed. Simply, there are no national data available on arrests or convictions for hate crimes. Ironically, while virtually all researchers have reported that hate crime has been increasing, the findings reported in this article indicate that hate crime incidents appear to have decreased 25% in the past 5 years. Also, despite the intent of legislators, the findings indicate that black persons comprise the only racial group, as identified by the FBI and Census Bureau, that are characterized as hate crime offenders (20% of the total number of offenders) in a proportion greater than their proportion in the general population (13%). It was concluded that to determine the actual implications of hate crime legislation, especially on minority group members, researchers might consider adopting a new methodology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbrahamH. J.(1998) The judicial process7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
American Bookseller Association v. Hudnut771 F.2d 323 (7th Cir.1985), affirmed, 475 U.S. 1001 (1986).
3.
The American Series of Foreign Penal Codes (1987) 28 The Penal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany (London: Sweet & Maxwell).
Anti-Defamation League. (2000b) Statement of the Anti-Defamation League on bias-motivated crime and H. R. 1082 — the hate crimes prevention act. Chicano-Latino Law Review21, 53.
6.
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. (1988) Hate groups in American: A record of bigotry and violence(rev. ed.). New York: Civil Rights Division of the ADL.
BakkenT.(2000) Liberty and equality through freedom of expression: the human rights questions behind hate crime laws. The International Journal of Human Rights4 (3), 1–12.
9.
BarnesA.EphrossP.(1994) The impact of hate crime violence on victims: Emotional and behavioral responses to attacks. Social Work39(3), 247–251.
10.
BerkR. A.(1990) Thinking about hate motivated crime. Journal of Interpersonal Violence5, 334–349.
11.
BerkR. A.BoydE. A.HamnerK. M.(1992) Thinking more clearly about hate motivated crimes. In HerekG. M.BerrillK. T. (Eds.), Hate crime: confronting violence against lesbians and gay men (pp. 123–143). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Bordernkircher v. Hayes434 U.S. 357 (1978).
13.
Bowers v. Hardwick478 U.S. 186 (1986).
14.
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale530 U.S. 640 (2000).
15.
BoydE.BerkR.HamnerK.(1997) ‘Motivated by hatred or prejudice’: Categorization of hate-motivated crimes in two police divisions. Law & Society Review30(4) 819–850.
16.
Boykin v. Alabama395 U.S. 238 (1969).
17.
BrooksT. D.(1994) First Amendment — penalty enhancement for hate crimes: content regulation, questionable state interests and non-traditional sentencing. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology84, 703–42.
18.
Brown v. Board of Education 349 U.S. 294 (1954).
19.
ChapperJ.HansonR.(1989) Understanding reversible error in criminal appeals (National Center for State Courts), in ColeG. F.SmithC. E., Criminal Justice. Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth.
20.
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire315 U.S. 568 (1943).
21.
Civil Rights Act of 1964. Public Law 88–352, 78 Statutes 241. Codified at 42 U.S.C.A. sections 2000a-2000h-6.
22.
ColeG. F.SmithC. E.(1998) The American system of criminal justice. Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth.
23.
ComstockG. D.(1991) Violence against lesbians and gay men. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
CorryR. J.(2000) Burn this article: it is evidence of your thought crime prosecution. Texas Review of Law and Politics4, 461.
25.
CzajkoskiE. H.(1992) Criminalizing hate: an empirical assessment. Federal Probation56, 36–40.
26.
DelgadoR.StefancicJ.(1997) Must we defend the Nazis?New York: New York University Press.
27.
DeanL.WuS.MartinJ. L.(1992) Trends in violence and discrimination against gay men in New York City: 1984–1990. In HerekG. M.BerrillK. T. (Eds.), Hate crime: confronting violence against lesbians and gay men (pp. 46–64). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Douglas-ScottS.(1999) The hatefulness of protected speech: a comparison of the American and European approaches, William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal7, p. 305.
31.
DowneyJ. P.StageF. K.(1999) Hate crimes and violence on college and university campuses. Journal of College Student Development40(1) 3–9.
FBI Hate Crime Data Collection Guidelines (1999) United States Department of Justice, Criminal Justice Information Services Division.Washington, DC.
38.
FBI Uniform Crime Reports (2000) United States Department of Justice, Criminal Justice Information Services Division. http://fbi.gov/ucr.htm. Washington, DC.
39.
GatesH. L.GriffenA. P.LivelyD. E.PostR. C.RubensteinW. B.StrossenN.(1994) Speaking of race, speaking of sex: hate speech, civil rights, and civil liberties. New York: New York University Press.
40.
Gideon v. Wainwright372 U.S. 335 (1963).
41.
GilbertA. M.MarchandE. D.(1999) Splitting the atom or splitting hairs: the Hate Crime Prevention Act of 1997, Saint Mary's Law Journal30, 931–986.
42.
GrattetR.JennessV.CurryT.(1998) The homogenization and differentiation of hate crime law in the United States, 1978 to 1995. American Sociological Review63(2), 286–307.
43.
GreenD. P.GlaserJ.RichA.(1998) From lynching to gay bashing: the elusive connection between economic conditions and hate crime. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology75(1), 82–92.
44.
GreenD. P.StrolovitchD. Z.WongJ. S.(1998) Defended neighborhoods, integration, and racially motivated crime. American Journal of Sociology104 (2), 372–403.
45.
GreenD.RichA.(1998) White supremacist activity and crossburnings in North Carolina. Journal of Quantitative Criminology14(3), 1998.
46.
GreenwaltK.(1989) Speech, crime, and the uses of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
47.
Haider-MarkelD. P.(1998) The politics of social regulatory policy: state and federal hate crime policy and implementation effort. Political Research Quarterly51, 69–88.
48.
Harper v. Virginia383 U.S. 663 (1966).
49.
Hate Crime Statistics Act (1990) Public Law 101–275, 104 State 140. [Amended by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Public Law 103–322, 108 State 1796; the Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996, Public Law 104–1551, 110 State 1392.]
50.
HerekG. M.BerrillK. T.(1992) Documenting the victimization of lesbian and gay men: methodological issues in hate crime. In HerekG. M.BerrillK. T. (Eds.), Hate crime: confronting violence against lesbians and gay men. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
JacobsJ. B.PotterK.(1997) Hate crimes: a critical perspective. Crime & Justice22, 1–50.
53.
JacobsJ. B.PotterK.(1998) Hate crimes: criminal law and identity politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
54.
JennessV.GrattetR.(1996) The criminalization of hate: a comparison of structural and polity influences on the passage of ‘bias-crime’ legislation in the United States. Sociological Perspectives39, 129–54.
55.
JennessV.KendalB.(1997) Hate crimes: new social movements and the politics of violence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
56.
Jolly-RyanJ.(1999/2000)Strengthening hate crime laws in Kentucky, Kentucky Law Journal88, 63–86.
KellinaM.WaldoC.(1996) ‘So, what's a hate crime anyway?’ young adults' perceptions of hate crimes, victim, and perpetrators. Law & Human Behavior20(2), 113–129.
59.
KlepperW. M.BakkenT.(1997) Hate speech: a call to principles. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators Journal35(1), 38–45.
60.
LawrenceF. M.(1999) Punishing hate bias crimes under American law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
LevinJ.McDevittJ.(1993) Hate crimes: the rising tide of bigotry and bloodshed. New York: Plenum Press.
62.
MarchandP.(1992) Circulaire du minister de I'Interieure,’ Rapport de la Commission nationale consultative des droits de l'homme, La Lutte Contre Le Racisnle et la Xenophobie (Paris: La Documentation francaise 1992) pp. 327–328.
63.
MaroneyT. A. (1998) The struggle against hate crime: movement at a crossroads, New York University Law Review73, 564–.
64.
MatsudiM.(1989) Public response to racist speech: considering the victim's story. Michigan Law Review87, 2320–2381.
65.
MillJ. S. (1859) On liberty, in The Tradition of Freedom464 (M.Mayer ed., 1957).
66.
Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973).
67.
Model Penal Code. (1985) Rape and related offenses, sec. 213(1)(d) & Robbery, sec. 222.1(2). In Criminal Law by John Kaplan, Robert Weisberg, and Guyora Binder (1996) 1204, 1209–1210.
68.
NahdiF.RichardsonR.(1998) Racism is not the only difference, New Statesman11, 498, 18–19.
69.
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Institute. (1993). Anti-gay violence, victimization, & defamation in 1992. Washington DC; National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Institute.
SloanL. M.KingL.SheppardS.(1998) Hate crimes motivated by sexual orientation: Police reporting and training, Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services8 (3), 25–39.
77.
The Swedish Penal Code (1990) (Stockholm, Sweden: Ministry of Justice, National council for Crime Prevention) sections 1, 5–6, pp. 13–14.
United States Constitution, Amendment XXIV (1964).
84.
United States Constitution, Amendment I (1791).
85.
United States Constitution, Article I, section 2 (1989).
86.
von ShulthessB.(1992) Violence in the streets: anti-lesbian assault and harassment in San Francisco. In HerekG. M.BerrillK. T. (Eds.), Hate crime: confronting violence against lesbians and gay men (pp. 6575). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
87.
WalkerS.(1994) Hate speech: the history of an American controversy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
88.
WardR. V.(1996) Hate crime, Gonzaga Law Review32, 511–521, 514.
89.
WertheimerD. M.(1992) Treatment and service interventions for lesbian and male crime victims. InHerekG. M.&BerrillK. T.(Eds.), Hate crime: confronting violence against lesbians and gay men (pp. 227–240). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
