As telehealth services are increasingly utilised and mature, it is important to continue to assess the preferences of both consumers and providers to ensure that these services are being used in the most acceptable and effective manner. This review aims to analyse both consumer and provider preferences for telephone and video consultations.
Methods
A systematic search of MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase databases was conducted in April 2023 to identify studies that investigated consumer or provider preferences for either telephone or video consultations. Data were extracted and synthesised narratively with the main reported findings from each article categorised in regard to modality preference (i.e. preference for either telephone or video; no preference between modality, equivalency, or mixed preference statements).
Results
A total of 78 articles were included in the analysis. Studies were published between 2003 and 2023, with the majority (86%) published after 2020. While most studies used quantitative survey methods (69.2%), five used qualitative (6.4%) and 19 used a mixed methods approach (24.4%). The majority of included studies (54% of consumer studies and 76% of provider studies) reported video as the preferred telehealth modality over telephone.
Discussion
Although video is mostly preferred over telephone, a number of consumer studies reported equivalent preference for telephone and video consultations and highlighted the benefits of each modality for different purposes.
SnoswellCLChelbergGDe GuzmanKR, et al.The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019. J Telemed Telecare2023; 29: 669–684.
4.
SnoswellCLStringerHTaylorML, et al.An overview of the effect of telehealth on mortality: A systematic review of meta-analyses. J Telemed Telecare2023; 29: 659–668.
5.
RushKLSeatonCLiE, et al.Rural use of health service and telemedicine during COVID-19: The role of access and eHealth literacy. Health Informatics J2021; 27: 14604582211020064.
6.
ChenPVHelmACaloudasSG, et al.Evidence of phone vs video-conferencing for mental health treatments: A review of the literature. Curr Psychiatry Rep2022; 24: 529–539.
7.
CafferyLJCatapanSDCTaylorML, et al.Telephone versus video consultations: A systematic review of comparative effectiveness studies and guidance for choosing the most appropriate modality. J Telemed Telecare2024: 1357633X241232464.
8.
De GuzmanKRSnoswellCLGilesCM, et al.GP Perceptions of telehealth services in Australia: A qualitative study. BJGP Open2022; 6: BJGPO.2021.0182.
9.
ConnollySLMillerCJGiffordALCharnessME. Perceptions and use of telehealth among mental health, primary, and specialty care clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open2022; 5: e2216401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16401
10.
ThomasEEde Camargo CatapanSHaydonHM, et al.Exploring factors of uneven use of telehealth among outpatient pharmacy clinics during COVID-19: A multi-method study. Rese Soc Administr Pharm2022; 18: 3602–3611.
11.
CookRHaydonHMThomasEE, et al.Digital divide or digital exclusion? Do allied health professionals’ assumptions drive use of telehealth?J Telemed Telecare2025; 31: 376–385.
12.
OrlandoJFBeardMKumarS. Systematic review of patient and caregivers’ satisfaction with telehealth videoconferencing as a mode of service delivery in managing patients’ health. PLoS One2019; 14: e0221848.
13.
TollKSparkLNeoB, et al.Consumer preferences, experiences, and attitudes towards telehealth: Qualitative evidence from Australia. PLoS One2022; 17: e0273935.
14.
WadeVAEliottJAHillerJE. Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services. Qualitative Health Res2014; 24: 682–694.
15.
EkelandAGBowesAFlottorpS. Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inf2010; 79: 736–771.
16.
SnoswellCLHaydonHMKellyJT, et al.How do consumers prefer their care delivered: In-person, telephone or videoconference?J Telemed Telecare2024; 30: 1555–1562.
17.
BanburyATaylorMCafferyL, et al.Consumers’ experiences, preferences, and perceptions of effectiveness in using telehealth for cancer care in Australia. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol2023; 19: 752–761.
18.
ByaruhangaJWiggersJPaulCL, et al.Acceptability of real-time video counselling compared to other behavioural interventions for smoking cessation in rural and remote areas. Drug Alcohol Depend2020; 217: 108296.
19.
KruseCSKrowskiNRodriguezB, et al.Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open2017; 7: e016242.
20.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ,et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ Br Med J2009; 339: 332–336.
21.
RonnebergCRLvNAjiloreOA, et al.Integrated collaborative care intervention for depression and obesity in primary care: Translation from research to practice. Health Educ Res2022; 37: 227–241.
22.
WakefieldBJBylundCLHolmanJE, et al.Nurse and patient communication profiles in a home-based telehealth intervention for heart failure management. Patient Educ Couns2008; 71: 285–292.
23.
HaysRDSkootskySA. Patient experience with in-person and telehealth visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large integrated health system in the United States. J Gen Intern Med. Mar2022; 37: 847–852.
24.
MustafaSSVadamalaiKRamseyA. Patient satisfaction with in-person, video, and telephone allergy/immunology evaluations during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract2021; 9: 1858–1863.
25.
NevesALvan DaelJO'BrienN, et al.Use and impact of virtual primary care on quality and safety: The public's perspectives during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Telemed Telecare2024; 30: 393–401.
26.
AgarwalPWangRMeaneyC, et al.Sociodemographic differences in patient experience with primary care during COVID-19: Results from a cross-sectional survey in Ontario, Canada. BMJ Open2022; 12: e056868.
27.
GorfinkelLRSnellGLongD, et al.Access to mental health support, unmet need and preferences among adolescents during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can2023; 43: 182–190. Acces a du soutien en sante mentale, besoins non combles et preferences en la matiere chez les adolescents au cours de la premiere annee de la pandemie de COVID-19.
28.
LiTZhangYWangG, et al.Willingness to engage in post-discharge follow-up service conducted via video telemedicine: Cross-sectional study. Int J Med Inform2022; 168: 104885.
29.
Ostrowski-DelahantySAMcNinchNLGrossoehmeDH, et al.Understanding drivers of telemedicine in pediatric medical care. Telemed J E Health2023; 29: 726–737.
30.
LawfordBJHinmanRSMorelloR, et al.Perceptions about the efficacy and acceptability of telephone and video-delivered allied health care for adults with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional national survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2022; 103: 1368–1378.
31.
DanilaMIGaviganKRiveraE, et al.Patient perceptions and preferences regarding telemedicine for autoimmune rheumatic diseases care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)2022; 74: 1049–1057.
32.
DanilaMISunDJacksonLE, et al.Satisfaction with modes of telemedicine delivery during COVID-19: A randomized, single-blind, parallel group, noninferiority trial. Am J Med Sci2022; 364: 538–546.
33.
DennettAMTaylorNFWilliamsK, et al.Consumer perspectives of telehealth in ambulatory care in an Australian health network. Health Soc Care Community2022; 30: 1903–1912.
34.
ShaverdianNGillespieEFChaE, et al.Impact of telemedicine on patient satisfaction and perceptions of care quality in radiation oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw2021; 19: 1174–1180.
35.
Schick-MakaroffKBerendonkCOverwaterJ, et al.How are Albertans “adjusting to and coping with” dialysis? A cross-sectional survey. Can J Kidney Health Dis2022; 9: 20543581221118436.
36.
SinghGDeWalleJTanrioverB, et al.Effect of age and rural residency on perceptions about SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and vaccination in kidney transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis2022; 24: e13943.
37.
LohmillerJSchaffelerNZipfelS,et al.Higher acceptance of videotelephonic counseling formats in psychosomatic medicine in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Psychiatry2021; 12: 747648.
38.
AllenAZZhuDShinC, et al.Patient satisfaction with telephone versus video-televisits: A cross-sectional survey of an urban, multiethnic population. Urology2021; 156: 110–116.
39.
OlszewskiCThomsonSPringK, et al.A comparison of telemedicine and in-person neurology visits: What are the factors that patients consider when selecting future visit type?J Neurol2022; 269: 5022–5037.
40.
KingeryMTHobermanABaronSL, et al.Day-of-Surgery video calls and phone calls increase patient satisfaction with outpatient surgery experience: A randomized controlled trial of postoperative communication modalities. J Bone Joint Surg Am2021; 103: 243–250.
41.
HamadJFoxAKammireMS, et al.Evaluating the experiences of new and existing teledermatology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Dermatol2021; 4: e25999.
42.
KattBMImbergamoCFletcherD, et al.Telehealth for upper extremity conditions: Perceptions of the patient and provider. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev2020; 4: e2000127–13.
43.
SaccoGLleonartSSimonR, et al.Communication technology preferences of hospitalized and institutionalized frail older adults during COVID-19 confinement: Cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2020; 8: e21845.
44.
LiLHuangJWuJ, et al.A Mobile health app for the collection of functional outcomes after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: Pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2020; 8: e17219.
45.
GolashVAthwalSKhandwalaM. Teleophthalmology and COVID-19: The patient perspective. Future Healthc J2021; 8: e54–e59.
46.
NestlerodeCPavelkaJBasilJ, et al.Patient perspectives of telemedicine in gynecologic oncology during COVID. Gynecol Oncol Rep2022; 43: 101071.
47.
RoyWHansBJannatRU, et al.Tele-visits for GERD: “ecofriendly, efficient and effective”. J Gastroenterol Hepatol2023; 38: 905–909.
48.
DavisAMSampiloMGallagherKS, et al.Treating rural paediatric obesity through telemedicine vs. Telephone: Outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare2016; 22: 86–95.
49.
WakefieldBJHolmanJERayA, et al.Outcomes of a home telehealth intervention for patients with heart failure. J Telemed Telecare2009; 15: 46–50.
50.
DrerupBEspenschiedJWiedemerJ,et al.Reduced no-show rates and sustained patient satisfaction of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health2021; 27: 1409–1415.
51.
YoungLSidenHTredwellS. Post-surgical telehealth support for children and family care-givers. J Telemed Telecare2007; 13: 15–19.
52.
GonzalezTTuckerKWakefieldCE, et al.Comparing cancer genetic counselling using telegenetics with in-person and telephone appointments: Results of a partially randomised patient-preference pilot study. J Telemed Telecare2024; 30: 949–960.
53.
WylerHLiebrenzMAjdacic-GrossV, et al.Treatment provision for adults with ADHD during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study on patient and therapist experience with on-site sessions using face masks vs. telepsychiatric sessions. BMC Psychiatry2021; 21: 37.
54.
CrunelleCLVan DaeleTVan LaereS, et al.Remote consultations for mental health: Patient experiences. J Community Health2023; 48: 347–352.
55.
JerantAFAzariRMartinezC,et al.A randomized trial of telenursing to reduce hospitalization for heart failure: Patient-centered outcomes and nursing indicators. Home Health Care Serv Q2003; 22: 1–20.
56.
RenardMGabouryIMichaudF,et al.The acceptability of two remote monitoring modalities for patients waiting for services in a physiotherapy outpatient clinic. Musculoskeletal Care2022; 20: 616–624.
57.
CasavantDWMcManusMLParsonsSK, et al.Trial of telemedicine for patients on home ventilator support: Feasibility, confidence in clinical management and use in medical decision-making. J Telemed Telecare2014; 20: 441–449.
58.
KhanMMManduchiBRodriguezV, et al.Exploring patient experiences with a telehealth approach for the PRO-ACTIVE trial intervention in head and neck cancer patients. BMC Health Serv Res2022; 22: 1218.
59.
ParkinsonADrewJHall DykgraafS, et al.They're getting a taste of our world': A qualitative study of people with multiple sclerosis’ experiences of accessing health care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Australian Capital Territory. Health Expect2021; 24: 1607–1617.
60.
SibandaVOnuboguIRaadM, et al.How effective are telephone and video consultations in shoulder and elbow clinics? Analysis using an objective scoring tool. Cureus2021; 13: e17380.
61.
RizziAMPolachekWSDulasM, et al.The new ‘normal': Rapid adoption of telemedicine in orthopaedics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Injury2020; 51: 2816–2821.
62.
TangLBroadJLewisR, et al. and S Guelph Family Health. Transitioning a home-based, motivational interviewing intervention among families to remote delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: Key lessons learned. Patient Educ Couns2021; 104: 2286–2291.
63.
GutmanCKKleinEJFollmerK, et al.Deficiencies in provider-reported interpreter use in a clinical trial comparing telephonic and video interpretation in a pediatric emergency department. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf2020; 46: 573–580.
64.
BeraRBronMBenningB, et al.Clinician perceptions of the negative impact of telehealth services in the management of drug-induced movement disorders and opportunities for quality improvement: A 2021 internet-based survey. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat2022; 18: 2945–2955.
65.
ZentnerKGaineGEthridgeP, et al.Clinicians’ attitudes toward telepsychology in addiction and mental health services, and prediction of postpandemic telepsychology uptake: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Form Res2022; 6: e35535.
66.
Kaufman-ShriquiVShaniMBoazM, et al.Opportunities and challenges in delivering remote primary care during the coronavirus outbreak. BMC Prim Care2022; 23: 35.
67.
TevaarwerkAJChanderengTOstermanT, et al.Oncologist perspectives on telemedicine for patients with cancer: A national comprehensive cancer network survey. JCO Oncol Pract2021; 17: e1318–e1326.
68.
MolfenterTHeitkampTMurphyAA, et al.Use of telehealth in mental health (MH) services during and after COVID-19. Community Ment Health J2021; 57: 1244–1251.
69.
LovecchioFRiewGJSamartzisD, et al.Provider confidence in the telemedicine spine evaluation: Results from a global study. Eur Spine J2021; 30: 2109–2123.
70.
ConnollySLGiffordALMillerCJ, et al.Provider perceptions of virtual care during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A multispecialty survey study. Med Care2021; 59: 646–652.
71.
DoranJMLawsonJL. The impact of COVID-19 on provider perceptions of telemental health. Psychiatr Q2021; 92: 1241–1258.
72.
AbrashkinKAWashkoJDLiT, et al.Video or telephone? A natural experiment on the added value of video communication in community paramedic responses. Ann Emerg Med2021; 77: 103–109.
73.
SandhuTDeSheaLJagarapuJ, et al.Multicenter study assessing physicians’ and transport teams’ attitudes and expectations about utilizing telemedicine to manage critical neonatal transports. J Telemed Telecare2024; 30: 895–902.
74.
ChangJELindenfeldZAlbertSL, et al.Telephone vs. Video visits during COVID-19: Safety-net provider perspectives. J Am Board Fam Med2021; 34: 1103–1114.
75.
SharmaAE. Clinician experience with telemedicine at a safety-net hospital network during COVID-19: A cross-sectional survey. J Health Care Poor & Underserved2021; 32: N.PAG–N.PAG.
76.
SykoraRRenzaMRuzickaJ, et al.Audiovisual consults by paramedics to reduce hospital transport after low-urgency calls: Randomized controlled trial. Prehosp Disaster Med2020; 35: 656–662.
77.
VoilsCIVenneVLWeidenbacherH, et al.Comparison of telephone and televideo modes for delivery of genetic counseling: A randomized trial. J Genet Couns2018; 27: 339–348.
78.
McCrossanBMorganGGrantB, et al.A randomised trial of a remote home support programme for infants with major congenital heart disease. Heart2012; 98: 1523–1528.
79.
BarsomEZvan DalenASHMBlussé van Oud-AlblasM, et al.Comparing video consultation and telephone consultation at the outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral centre: Patient and provider benefits. BMJ Innov2021; 7: 95–102.
80.
DharmarMRomanoPSKuppermannN, et al.Impact of critical care telemedicine consultations on children in rural emergency departments. Crit Care Med2013; 41: 2388–2395.
81.
BanburyASmithACTaylorML, et al.Cancer care and management during COVID-19: A comparison of in-person, video and telephone consultations. J Telemed Telecare2022; 28: 733–739.
82.
GrenCEgerodILinderothG, et al.“We can't do without it”: Parent and call-handler experiences of video triage of children at a medical helpline. PLoS One2022; 17: e0266007.
83.
ChuCNayyarDBhattacharyyaO, et al.Patient and provider experiences with virtual care in a large, ambulatory care hospital in Ontario, Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: Observational study. J Med Internet Res2022; 24: e38604.
84.
Zorron Cheng Tao PuLRavalMTerbahR, et al.Video consultations during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic are associated with high satisfaction for both doctors and patients. JGH Open2021; 5: 542–548.
85.
LocatisCWilliamsonDGould-KablerC, et al.Comparing in-person, video, and telephonic medical interpretation. J Gen Intern Med2010; 25: 345–350.
86.
ChoiJSKimJHParkS, et al.Telemedicine in otolaryngology during COVID-19: Patient and physician satisfaction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg2022; 167: 56–64.
87.
StavrouMLioutasELioutasJ,et al.Experiences of remote consulting for patients and neurologists during the COVID-19 pandemic in Scotland. BMJ Neurol Open2021; 3: e000173.
88.
NguyenDDNguyenAXBouhadanaD, et al.Pilot trial of telemedicine in urology: Video vs. Telephone consultations. Can Urol Assoc J2022; 16: 104–111.
89.
KnausMEKerseyKAhmadH, et al.Both sides of the screen: Provider and patient perspective on telemedicine in pediatric surgery. J Pediatr Surg2022; 57: 1614–1621.
90.
BulmanJCEl-GabalawyFMartinezLA, et al.Patient and provider perspectives of telehealth and in-person interventional radiology clinic visits. J Vasc Interv Radiol2023; 34: 466–473.
91.
JoughinAIbitoyeSCreesA, et al.Developing a virtual geriatric perioperative medicine clinic: A mixed methods healthcare improvement study. Age Ageing2021; 50: 1391–1396.
92.
HastingsSNMahannaEPBerkowitzTSZ, et al.Video-Enhanced care management for medically Complex older adults with cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc2021; 69: 77–84.
93.
AltmannPLeutmezerFPonleitnerM, et al.Remote visits for people with multiple sclerosis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Austria: The TELE MS randomized controlled trial. Digit Health2022; 8: 20552076221112154.
94.
MorganGJCraigBGrantB, et al.Home videoconferencing for patients with severe congential heart disease following discharge. Congenit Heart Dis2008; 3: 317–324.
95.
RyanMWardECBurnsCL, et al.An evaluation of telephone versus videoconference consults for pre-treatment medication history taking by cancer pharmacists. J Telemed Telecare2022; 28: 750–756.
96.
GreenhalghTLaddsEHughesG, et al.Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? Qualitative study in UK general practice. Br J Gener Pract2022; 72: e351–e360.
97.
NewbouldJAbelGBallS, et al.Evaluation of telephone first approach to demand management in English general practice: Observational study. Br Med J2017: 358.
98.
CatapanSTaylorMScuffhamP, et al.Improving consumer trust in digital health: a mixed methods study involving people living with chronic kidney disease (in-press). Digital Health2025 Jan; 11: 20552076241312440.
99.
Martin-KhanMFreemanSAdamK,et al.The evolution of telehealth. Mobile e-Health2017: 172–198.
100.
CatapanSHaydonHMHickmanIJ, et al.Trust and confidence in using telehealth in people with chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional study. J Telemed Telecare2023; 29: 16S–23S.
101.
Gallegos-RejasVMKellyJTLucasK, et al.A cross-sectional study exploring equity of access to telehealth in culturally and linguistically diverse communities in a major health service. Aust Health Rev2023; 47: 721–728.
102.
GreenhalghTWhertonJShawS,et al.Video consultations for covid-19. Br Med J2020; 368: m998.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
