Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-9
Effectiveness of behavior change and self-management theoretically-informed telehealth interventions for stroke secondary prevention: An overview of systematic reviews
Despite the increased use of telehealth interventions, low-level evidence supports their use for behavior change and self-management in stroke secondary prevention. Therefore, this overview of systematic reviews (SRs) critically appraises and consolidates the evidence about theoretically-informed telehealth interventions in stroke secondary prevention.
Methods
Two phases were conducted independently by two reviewers. Phase-1 included SRs contemplating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) implementing telehealth interventions with individuals post-stroke, targeting cardiovascular events, risk-reducing health behaviors or physiological risk factors. Phase-2 interrogated RCTs from these SRs that implemented theoretically-informed interventions. Best-evidence synthesis of published meta-analyses and new meta-analyses of theoretically-informed interventions were conducted. GRADE evidence was applied.
Results
In Phase-1 (15 SRs), best-evidence synthesis identified telehealth interventions as effective in reducing recurrent angina and recurrent stroke rates (both with very low GRADE), improving medication adherence (low GRADE), physical activity participation (very low GRADE), and blood pressure targets (very low GRADE), reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) (moderate GRADE) and low-density lipoprotein levels (very low GRADE). In Phase-2 (14 RCTs), new meta-analyses identified theoretically-informed telehealth interventions as effective in improving medication adherence (SMD: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.13–0.64; I²: 72%, low GRADE) and healthy eating (SMD: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.15–0.60; I²: 38%, low GRADE), and decreasing SBP (MD: −9.19; 95%CI: −5.49 to −12.89; I²: 0%, moderate GRADE).
Discussion
Telehealth demonstrates utility in stroke secondary prevention, notably in SBP reduction. High-quality RCTs are required given the lack of current evidence supporting theoretically-informed telehealth interventions addressing primary outcomes of secondary prevention, and the low certainty evidence identified for health behavior change.
FeiginVLBraininMNorrvingB, et al.World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. Int J Stroke2022; 17: 18–29.
2.
GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol2021; 20: 795–820.
3.
LinBZhangZMeiY, et al.Cumulative risk of stroke recurrence over the last 10 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci2021; 42: 61–71.
4.
WangAWuLWangX, et al.Effect of recurrent stroke on poor functional outcome in transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Int J Stroke2016; 11: NP80.
5.
ModregoPJPinaMAFrajMM, et al.Type, causes, and prognosis of stroke recurrence in the province of Teruel, Spain. A 5-year analysis. Neurol Sci2000; 21: 355–360.
6.
ZhongWGengNWangP, et al.Prevalence, causes and risk factors of hospital readmissions after acute stroke and transient ischemic attack: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci2016; 37: 1195–1202.
LawrenceMAsabaEDuncanE, et al.Stroke secondary prevention, a non-surgical and non-pharmacological consensus definition: results of a Delphi study. BMC Res Notes2019; 12: 823.
9.
GladstoneDJLindsayMPDouketisJ, et al.Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Secondary Prevention of Stroke Update 2020. Can J Neurol Sci2022; 49: 315–337.
10.
KleindorferDOTowfighiAChaturvediS, et al.Guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke2021; 2021(52): e364–e467.
11.
HarshfieldELGeorgakisMKMalikR, et al.Modifiable lifestyle factors and risk of stroke: A Mendelian randomization analysis. Stroke2021; 52: 931–936.
12.
World Health Organization, International Telecommunication Union. WHO-ITU global standard for accessibility of telehealth services. Geneva: World Health Organization and International Telecommunication Union, 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240050464(accessed 09 August 2023).
13.
LiuPWangFXuW, et al.Trends and frontiers of research on telemedicine from 1971 to 2022: A scientometric and visualisation analysis. J Telemed Telecare2023; 29: 731–746.
14.
SchulzTLongKKanhutuK, et al.Telehealth during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Rapid expansion of telehealth outpatient use during a pandemic is possible if the programme is previously established. J Telemed Telecare2022; 28: 445–451.
15.
SnoswellCLChelbergGGuzmanKR, et al.The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019. J Telemed Telecare2023; 29: 669–684.
16.
BloemBRDorseyEROkunMS. The coronavirus disease 2019 crisis as catalyst for telemedicine for chronic neurological disorders. JAMA Neurol2020; 77: 927–928.
17.
LaiJCWooJHuiE, et al.Telerehabilitation - a new model for community-based stroke rehabilitation. J Telemed Telecare2004; 10: 199–205.
18.
WeinTLindsayMPCôtéR, et al.Canadian Stroke best practice recommendations: Secondary prevention of stroke, sixth edition practice guidelines, update 2017. Int J Stroke2018; 13: 420–443.
19.
AdlerAJMartinNMarianiJ, et al.Mobile phone text messaging to improve medication adherence in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2017; 4: Cd011851.
20.
Al-ArkeeSMasonJLaneDA, et al.Mobile apps to improve medication adherence in cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res2021; 23: e24190.
21.
ZengZWuTLvM, et al.Impact of mobile health and telehealth technology on medication adherence of stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Clin Pharm2022; 44: 4–14.
22.
GandapurYKianoushSKelliHM, et al.The role of mHealth for improving medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes2016; 2: 237–244.
23.
KassavouASuttonS. Automated telecommunication interventions to promote adherence to cardio-metabolic medications: Meta-analysis of effectiveness and meta-regression of behaviour change techniques. Health Psychol Rev2018; 12: 25–42.
24.
HigginsJPTThomasJChandlerJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.3. Cochrane, 2022. Available from:www.training.cochrane.org/handbook(accessed 09 August 2023).
25.
GatesMGatesAPieperD, et al.Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: Development of the PRIOR statement. Br Med J2022; 378: e070849.
26.
LennonOBlakeCBoothJ, et al.Interventions for behaviour change and self-management in stroke secondary prevention: Protocol for an overview of reviews. Syst Rev2018; 7: 231.
27.
HallPLawrenceMBlakeC, et al.Interventions for behaviour change and self-management of risk in stroke secondary prevention: an overview of reviews. Cerebrovasc Dis2024; 53: 1–13.
28.
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 149: Risk estimation and the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2017. Available at:https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign149.pdf(accessed 09 August 2023).
29.
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) Executive Committee, ESO Writing Committee. Guidelines for management of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack 2008. Cerebrovasc Dis2008; 25: 457–507.
30.
McGowanJSampsonMSalzwedelDM, et al.PRESS Peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol2016; 75: 40–46.
31.
MartinicMKPieperDGlattA, et al.Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks. BMC Med Res Methodol2019; 19: 203.
32.
Pérez-BracchiglioneJMezaNBangdiwalaSI, et al.Graphical representation of overlap for OVErviews: GROOVE tool. Res Synth Methods2022; 13: 381–388.
Center for Connected Health Policy (CCHP). What is telehealth? Center for Connected Health Policy. Available from: https://www.cchpca.org/what-is-telehealth/(2023, accessed 09 August 2023).
35.
WhitingPSavovićJHigginsJP, et al.ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J Clin Epidemiol2016; 69: 225–234.
36.
GuyattGHOxmanADVistGE, et al.GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J2008; 336: 924–926.
37.
GuyattGHOxmanADVistG, et al.GRADE Guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence–study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 407–415.
38.
GuyattGHOxmanADKunzR, et al.GRADE Guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 1294–1302.
39.
GuyattGHOxmanADKunzR, et al.GRADE Guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence–indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 1303–1310.
40.
GuyattGHOxmanADKunzR, et al.GRADE Guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence–imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 1283–1293.
41.
GuyattGHOxmanADMontoriV, et al.GRADE Guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence–publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 1277–1282.
42.
MichieSRichardsonMJohnstonM, et al.The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med2013; 46: 81–95.
HoffmannTCGlasziouPPBoutronI, et al.Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. Br Med J2014; 348: g1687.
45.
HigginsJPAltmanDGGøtzschePC, et al.The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J2011; 343: d5928–d5928.
46.
ArmitageLCKassavouASuttonS. Do mobile device apps designed to support medication adherence demonstrate efficacy? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials, with meta-analysis. BMJ Open2020; 10: e032045.
47.
FreundMCareyMDilworthS, et al.Effectiveness of information and communications technology interventions for stroke survivors and their support people: A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil2022; 44: 4563–4578.
48.
GandhiSChenSHongL, et al.Effect of Mobile health interventions on the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol2017; 33: 219–231.
49.
HwangNKParkJSChangMY. Telehealth interventions to support self-management in stroke survivors: A systematic review. Healthcare (Basel)2021; 9: 472.
50.
KraftPHillmannSRückerV, et al.Telemedical strategies for the improvement of secondary prevention in patients with cerebrovascular events-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke2017; 12: 597–605.
51.
LaverKEAdey-WakelingZCrottyM, et al.Telerehabilitation services for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2020; 1: Cd010255.
52.
LvMWuTJiangS, et al.Effects of telemedicine and mHealth on systolic blood pressure management in stroke patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2021; 9: e24116.
53.
ParkLGBeattyAStaffordZ, et al.Mobile phone interventions for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis2016; 58: 639–650.
54.
PattersonKDaveyRKeeganR, et al.Smartphone applications for physical activity and sedentary behaviour change in people with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One2021; 16: e0258460.
55.
RintalaAPäivärinneVHakalaS, et al.Effectiveness of technology-based distance physical rehabilitation interventions for improving physical functioning in stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2019; 100: 1339–1358.
56.
AdieKJamesMA. Does telephone follow-up improve blood pressure after minor stroke or TIA?Age Ageing2010; 39: 598–603.
57.
CadilhacDAAndrewNEBusingyeD, et al.Pilot randomised clinical trial of an eHealth, self-management support intervention (iVERVE) for stroke: Feasibility assessment in survivors 12–24 months post-event. Pilot Feasibility Stud2020; 6: 172.
58.
GillhamSEndacottR. Impact of enhanced secondary prevention on health behaviour in patients following minor stroke and transient ischaemic attack: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil2010; 24: 822–830.
59.
HedegaardUKjeldsenLJPottegårdA, et al.Multifaceted intervention including motivational interviewing to support medication adherence after stroke/transient ischemic attack: A randomized trial. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra2014; 4: 221–234.
60.
KamalAKShaikhQPashaO, et al.A randomized controlled behavioral intervention trial to improve medication adherence in adult stroke patients with prescription tailored short messaging service (SMS)-SMS4Stroke study. BMC Neurol2015; 15: 212.
61.
KimHKimO. [The lifestyle modification coaching program for secondary stroke prevention]. J Korean Acad Nurs2013; 43: 331–340.
62.
KimJILeeSKimJH. Effects of a web-based stroke education program on recurrence prevention behaviors among stroke patients: A pilot study. Health Educ Res2013; 28: 488–501.
63.
KirknessCJCainKCBeckerKJ, et al.Randomized trial of telephone versus in-person delivery of a brief psychosocial intervention in post-stroke depression. BMC Res Notes2017; 10: 500.
64.
MackenzieGIrelandSMooreS, et al.Tailored interventions to improve hypertension management after stroke or TIA–phase II (TIMS II). Can J Neurosci Nurs2013; 35: 27–34.
65.
ReevesMJFritzMCWoodwardAT, et al.Michigan Stroke Transitions Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes2019; 12: e005493.
66.
SarfoFSTreiberFGebregziabherM, et al.Phone-based intervention for blood pressure control among Ghanaian stroke survivors: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke2019; 14: 630–638.
67.
WanLHZhangXPMoMM, et al.Effectiveness of goal-setting telephone follow-up on health behaviors of patients with ischemic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis2016; 25: 2259–2270.
68.
WanLHZhangXPYouLM, et al.The efficacy of a comprehensive reminder system to improve health behaviors and blood pressure control in hypertensive ischemic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. J Cardiovasc Nurs2018; 33: 509–517.
69.
WangMYShenMJWanLH, et al.Effects of a comprehensive reminder system based on the health belief model for patients who have had a stroke on health behaviors, blood pressure, disability, and recurrence from baseline to 6 months: A randomized controlled trial. J Cardiovasc Nurs2020; 35: 156–164.
70.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372: 71.
71.
ChenS. [The influence of strengthening health education on declining the rate of recurrence and stroke]. Journal of Qiqihar University of Medicine2011; 32: 2515–2516.
72.
HongL. The observation of WeChat improvement on self-efficiency of patients who received the carotid artery stent implantation. Chin Dig Med2015; 6: 54–56.
73.
KronishIMDiefenbachMAEdmondsonDE, et al.Key barriers to medication adherence in survivors of strokes and transient ischemic attacks. J Gen Intern Med2013; 28: 675–682.
74.
JiangYYangXLiZ, et al.Persistence of secondary prevention medication and related factors for acute ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack in China. Neurol Res2017; 39: 492–497.
75.
O'DonnellMJChinSLRangarajanS, et al.Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): A case-control study. Lancet2016; 388: 761–775.
76.
EttehadDEmdinCAKiranA, et al.Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet2016; 387: 957–967.
77.
LauLHLewJBorschmannK, et al.Prevalence of diabetes and its effects on stroke outcomes: A meta-analysis and literature review. J Diabetes Investig2019; 10: 780–792.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
