At a rate of more than 30% annually, neck pain is a very prevalent musculoskeletal ailment that is second only to low back pain as the most common cause of disability. Most occurrences of neck pain are nonspecific. Telerehabilitation is regarded as a potentially effective healthcare approach in this setting. This review aims to evaluate how a telerehabilitation-based intervention affected individuals with nonspecific neck pain (NNP) in terms of pain and disability.
Methods
PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane library, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI, and WanFang were consulted from inception to September 2023, with the inclusion of randomized controlled trials only. The experimental data were meta-analyzed using RevMan 5.3.
Results
The meta-analysis contained eight studies; there was no significant difference in pain improvement in patients with NNP by telerehabilitation compared to conventional care (SMD = −0.10, 95% CI: −0.48 to 0.28), but there was a significant effect on disability improvement (SMD = −0.41, 95% CI: −0.78 to −0.03). Telerehabilitation demonstrated more significant improvements in pain (SMD = −1.16, 95% CI: −1.99 to −0.32) and disability (MD = −3.78, 95% CI: −5.29 to −2.27) compared to minimal or no intervention.
Discussion
This study emphasizes the potential benefits of employing telerehabilitation in patients with NNP, especially in reducing pain intensity and improving disability. But additional study is required to fully grasp the potential of telerehabilitation in this field.
HoyDMarchLWoolfA, et al.The global burden of neck pain: Estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis2014; 73: 1309–1315.
2.
BierJDScholten-PeetersWGMStaalJB, et al.Clinical practice guideline for physical therapy assessment and treatment in patients with nonspecific neck pain. Phys Ther2018; 98: 162–171.
3.
FerrariRRussellAS. Regional musculoskeletal conditions: Neck pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol2003; 17: 57–70.
4.
CohenSP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc2015; 90: 284–299.
5.
DewitteVPeersmanWDanneelsL, et al.Subjective and clinical assessment criteria suggestive for five clinical patterns discernible in nonspecific neck pain patients. A Delphi-survey of clinical experts. Man Ther2016; 26: 87–96.
6.
PachDPiperMLotzF, et al.Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Tuina for chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial comparing Tuina with a No-intervention waiting list. J Altern Complement Med2018; 24: 231–237.
7.
RussellTG. Physical rehabilitation using telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare2007; 13: 217–220.
8.
BashshurRShannonGKrupinskiE, et al.The taxonomy of telemedicine. Telemed J E Health2011; 17: 484–494.
9.
RoganteMGrigioniMCordellaD, et al.Ten years of telerehabilitation: A literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation2010; 27: 287–304.
10.
SeronPOliverosM-JGutierrez-AriasR, et al.Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapy: A rapid overview. Phys Ther2021; 101: pzab053.
11.
Suso-MartíLLa ToucheRHerranz-GómezA, et al.Effectiveness of telerehabilitation in physical therapist practice: An Umbrella and mapping review with meta-meta-analysis. Phys Ther2021; 101: pzab075.
12.
BorghoutsJAJKoesBWVondelingH, et al.Cost-of-illness of neck pain in The Netherlands in 1996. Pain1999; 80: 629–636.
13.
Bos IBCK-dHovingJLvan TulderMW, et al.Cost effectiveness of physiotherapy, manual therapy, and general practitioner care for neck pain: Economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. Br Med J2003; 326: 911.
14.
KairyDLehouxPVincentC, et al.A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil2009; 31: 427–447.
15.
AgostiniMMojaLBanziR, et al.Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare2015; 21: 202–213.
16.
WuY-QLongYPengW-J, et al.The efficacy and safety of telerehabilitation for fibromyalgia: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res2023; 25: e42090.
17.
XieS-HWangQWangL-Q, et al.Effect of internet-based rehabilitation programs on improvement of pain and physical function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Med Internet Res2021; 23: e21542.
18.
ShuklaHNairSRThakkerD. Role of telerehabilitation in patients following total knee arthroplasty: Evidence from a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare2017; 23: 339–346.
19.
JiangSXiangJGaoX, et al.The comparison of telerehabilitation and face-to-face rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare2018; 24: 257–262.
20.
Lara-PalomoICGil-MartínezERamírez-GarcíaJD, et al.Efficacy of e-health interventions in patients with chronic low-back pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Telemed J E Health2022; 28: 1734–1752.
21.
OnanDUlgerOMartellettiP. Effects of spinal stabilization exercises delivered using telerehabilitation on outcomes in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Expert Rev Neurother2023; 23: 269–280.
22.
LintonSJHellsingALBergströmG. Exercise for workers with musculoskeletal pain: Does enhancing compliance decrease pain?J Occup Rehabil1996; 6: 177–190.
23.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Br Med J2009; 339: b2535–b2535. Epub ahead of print 21 July 2009..
24.
Armijo-OlivoSSaltajiHda CostaBR, et al.What is the influence of randomisation sequence generation and allocation concealment on treatment effects of physical therapy trials? A meta-epidemiological study. BMJ Open2015; 5: e008562.
25.
MoseleyAMRahmanPWellsGA, et al.Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions. PLoS One2019; 14: e0222770.
26.
HigginsJPTAltmanDGGøtzschePC, et al.The Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J2011; 343: d5928.
27.
HróbjartssonABoutronITurnerL, et al. Assessing risk of bias in randomised clinical trials included in Cochrane Reviews: the why is easy, the how is a challenge. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000058
28.
MoseleyAMHerbertRDMaherCG, et al.Reported quality of randomized controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions has improved over time. J Clin Epidemiol2011; 64: 594–601.
29.
HerbertRMoseleyASherringtonC. PEDro: A database of randomised controlled trials in physiotherapy. Health Inf Manag1998; 28: 186–188.
30.
MaherCGSherringtonCHerbertRD, et al.Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther2003; 83: 713–721.
31.
HuttonBSalantiGCaldwellDM, et al.The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: Checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med2015; 162: 777–784.
32.
Huedo-MedinaTBSánchez-MecaJMarín-MartínezF, et al.Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?Psychol Methods2006; 11: 193–206.
33.
ÖzelMKaya CiddiP. The effectiveness of telerehabilitation-based structured exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare2022: 1357633X221095782. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X221095782
34.
KosterinkSMHuis In ‘T VeldRMCagnieB, et al.The clinical effectiveness of a myofeedback-based teletreatment service in patients with non-specific neck and shoulder pain: A randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare2010; 16: 316–321.
35.
ThongtipmakSBuranrukOEungpinichpongW, et al.Immediate effects and acceptability of an application-based stretching exercise incorporating deep slow breathing for neck pain self-management. Healthc Inform Res2020; 26: 50–60.
36.
GialanellaBEttoriTFaustiniS, et al.Home-based telemedicine in patients with chronic neck pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2017; 96: 327–332.
37.
ÖzlüAÜnverGHİTuna, et al. Effects of interactive telerehabilitation practices in office workers with chronic nonspecific neck pain: Randomized controlled study. Telemed J E Health2024; 30: 438–447. Epub ahead of print 26 July 2023..
38.
LeeJLeeMLimT, et al.Effectiveness of an application-based neck exercise as a pain management tool for office workers with chronic neck pain and functional disability: A pilot randomized trial. Eur J Integr Med2017; 12: 87–92.
39.
SandsjöLLarsmanPHuis in ‘t VeldRMHA, et al.Clinical evaluation of a myofeedback-based teletreatment service applied in the workplace: A randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare2010; 16: 329–335.
40.
PachDBlödtSWangJ, et al.App-Based relaxation exercises for patients with chronic neck pain: Pragmatic randomized trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2022; 10: e31482.
41.
AdamseCDekker-Van WeeringMGvan Etten-JamaludinFS, et al.The effectiveness of exercise-based telemedicine on pain, physical activity and quality of life in the treatment of chronic pain: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare2018; 24: 511–526.
42.
CottrellMAGaleaOAO’LearySP, et al.Real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil2017; 31: 625–638.
43.
DiasJFOliveiraVCBorgesPRT, et al.Effectiveness of exercises by telerehabilitation on pain, physical function and quality of life in people with physical disabilities: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with GRADE recommendations. Br J Sports Med2021; 55: 155–162.
44.
LynchMECampbellFClarkAJ, et al.A systematic review of the effect of waiting for treatment for chronic pain. Pain2008; 136: 97–116.
45.
KazeminasabSNejadghaderiSAAmiriP, et al.Neck pain: Global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2022; 23: 26.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
