Demographic and socioeconomic disparities in the hybrid ophthalmology telemedicine model

Abstract

Importance

As telemedicine use expands, it is important to evaluate demographic and socioeconomic disparities among patients receiving ophthalmic care through new hybrid telemedicine models.

Objective

To evaluate whether there are demographic and socioeconomic disparities in the delivery of the hybrid telemedicine model.

Design

Retrospective, cross-sectional, case-control analysis of patient encounters from April to December 2020.

Setting

A single, academic, hospital-based eye clinic in Boston, Massachusetts.

Methods

Electronic medical records of all patient encounters from April to December 2020 were reviewed and categorized into hybrid, virtual-only, and standard in-person visits. Patient-level data for all visits were extracted including age, sex, race/ethnicity, primary language, Area Deprivation Index (ADI), insurance type, and marital status. Visit-level data for all hybrid visits were also extracted from the medical record including the visit dates and patient adherence. Demographics for the cohort of patients with at least one no-show visit were compared with demographics for the cohort of patients who only had completed visits. The primary study outcomes were the differences in demographic characteristics between the hybrid visit show and no-show groups. The secondary outcomes included demographic characteristics of patients who did not complete their hybrid visit versus a time-matched cohort of patients who did not complete their standard in-person visit. Continuous variables for patient characteristics were compared with independent samples t-tests and categorical variables were compared using Pearson chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the differences between the cohorts. Variables with missing values other than suppressed ADI values were imputed using multiple imputations by chained equations.

Results

Of a total of 1025 patients who were scheduled for a hybrid visit, 145 (14.1%) patients failed to complete their visit. Primary language and insurance were found to be statistically different between patients who completed and did not complete their hybrid visits. More English speakers and fewer Haitian Creole speakers completed their hybrid visits (p = 0.007) while more patients with private insurance and fewer patients with Medicaid completed their hybrid telemedicine visits (p = 0.026). No associations were found between hybrid telemedicine visit adherence and age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, or ADI. When the 145 patients who failed to complete their hybrid visits were compared to a time-matched cohort of patients who failed to complete their standard in-person visit, we found that patients who missed hybrid visits were similar to those who missed standard in-person visits except for patients insured by Medicare. These patients were more likely to miss a hybrid visit than a standard in-person visit (Odds Ratio 2.199, 95% confidence interval 1.136–4.259, p = 0.019). No associations were found between patient nonadherence with hybrid telemedicine versus with standard in-person visits based on age, sex, primary language, race/ethnicity, marital status, or ADI.

Conclusion

The hybrid telemedicine model was associated with insurance and language-based disparities. Patients with non-English primary language and Medicaid recipients were more likely to miss a hybrid visit than their counterparts. Our findings support developing deliberate interventions to ensure hybrid telemedicine care is delivered equitably to all patients.

Keywords

Telemedicine ophthalmology hybrid telemedicine teleophthalmology health disparities visit adherence COVID-19

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dorsey

Topol

. State of telehealth. New Engl J Med 2016; 375: 154–161.

Marcin

Shaikh

Steinhorn

. Addressing health disparities in rural communities using telehealth. Pediatr Res 2016; 79: 169–176.

Hall

Pershing

, et al. Age, gender, and laterality of retinal vascular occlusion: A retrospective study from the IRIS® registry. Ophthalmol Retina 2021: 161–171.

Mosenia

Seefeldt

, et al. Longitudinal use of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic and utility of asynchronous testing for subspecialty-level ophthalmic care. JAMA Ophthalmol 2023; 141: 56–61.

Pierce

Stevermer

. Disparities in the use of telehealth at the onset of the COVID-19 public health emergency. J Telemed Telecare 2023; 29: 3–9.

Wegermann

Wilder

Parish

, et al. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in utilization of telehealth in patients with liver disease during COVID-19. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67: 93–99.

Schifeling

Shanbhag

Johnson

, et al. Disparities in video and telephone visits among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional analysis. JMIR Aging 2020; 3: e23176.

Chen

Andoh

Nwanyanwu

. Socioeconomic and demographic disparities in the use of telemedicine for ophthalmic care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ophthalmology 2022; 129: 15–25.

Aziz

Moon

Parikh

, et al. Association of patient characteristics with delivery of ophthalmic telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Ophthalmol 2021; 139: 1174–1182.

10.

Sanayei

Albrecht

Martin

, et al. Outcomes of a hybrid ophthalmology telemedicine model for outpatient eye care during COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5: e2226292.

11.

Jencks

Schuster

Dougherty

, et al. Safety-net hospitals, neighborhood disadvantage, and readmissions under Maryland’s all-payer program: An observational study. Ann Intern Med 2019; 171: 91–98.

12.

Kind

AJH

Nerenz

. Area deprivation index predicts readmission risk at an urban teaching hospital. Am J Med Qual 2018; 33: 493–501.

13.

Bartels

Rovin

, et al. Neighborhood characteristics, and in-hospital coronavirus disease-2019 mortality. Med Care 2021; 59: 888–892.

14.

Kind

AJH

Buckingham

. Making neighborhood-disadvantage metrics accessible — the neighborhood atlas. New Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2456–2458.

15.

Patel

Mehrotra

Huskamp

, et al. Variation in telemedicine use and outpatient care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Health Aff Proj Hope 2021; 40: 349–358.

16.

Aguwa

Repka

, et al. Teleophthalmology in the era of COVID-19: Characteristics of early adopters at a large academic institution. Telemed E-Health 2021; 27: 739–746.

17.

Elam

Sidhom

Ugoh

. Disparities in eye care utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Ophthalmol 2022; 233: 163–170.

18.

VanderBeek

. Telemedicine and the exacerbation of health care disparities. JAMA Ophthalmol 2021; 139: 1182–1183.

19.

Timmins

. The impact of language barriers on the health care of Latinos in the United States: A review of the literature and guidelines for practice. J Midwifery Womens Health 2002; 47: 80–96.

20.

Fiscella

Williams

. Health disparities based on socioeconomic inequities: Implications for urban health care. Acad Med 2004; 79: 1139–1147.

21.

Fiscella

Franks

Doescher

, et al. Disparities in health care by race, ethnicity, and language among the insured: Findings from a national sample. Med Care 2002; 40: 52–59.

22.

Kaplan-Lewis

Percac-Lima

. No-show to primary care appointments: Why patients do not come. J Prim Care Community Health 2013; 4: 251–255.

23.

Nguyen

DeJesus

Wieland

. Missed appointments in resident continuity clinic: Patient characteristics and health care outcomes. J Grad Med Educ 2011; 3: 350–355.

24.

Andreae

White

Chen

, et al. The effect of initiatives to overcome language barriers and improve attendance: A cross-sectional analysis of adherence in an inner city chronic pain clinic. Pain Med 2017; 18: 265–274.

25.

Varma

Mohanty

Deneen

, et al. Burden and predictors of undetected eye disease in Mexican-Americans: The Los Angeles Latino eye study. Med Care 2008; 46: 497–506.

26.

McCormick

Sayah

Lokko

, et al. Access to care after Massachusetts’ health care reform: A safety net hospital patient survey. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27: 1548–1554.

27.

Chiam

Kunselman

Chen

. Characteristics associated with new patient appointment no-shows at an academic ophthalmology department in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol 2021; 229: 210–219.

28.

Suresh

Thoveson

, et al. Loss to follow-up among patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy in clinical practice. Am J Ophthalmol 2020; 215: 66–71.

29.

Chen

Ahluwalia

Parikh

, et al. Ophthalmic emergency department visits: Factors associated with loss to follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2021; 222: 126–136.

30.

Greig

Gonzalez-Colaso

Nwanyanwu

. Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities drive appointment no-show in patients with chronic eye disease. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. Epub ahead of print 2023; 10: 1790–1797.

31.

Fairless

Nwanyanwu

. Barriers to and facilitators of diabetic retinopathy screening utilization in a high-risk population. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2019; 6: 1244–1249.

32.

Eades

Alexander

. A mixed-methods exploration of non-attendance at diabetes appointments using peer researchers. Health Expect Int J Public Particip Health Care Health Policy 2019; 22: 1260–1271.

33.

Anthony

Campos-Castillo

Lim

. Who isn’t using patient portals and why? Evidence and implications from A national sample of US adults. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018; 37: 1948–1954.

34.

Kruse

Krowski

Rodriguez

, et al. Telehealth and patient satisfaction: A systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open 2017; 7: e016242.

35.

Yusif

Soar

Hafeez-Baig

. Older people, assistive technologies, and the barriers to adoption: A systematic review. Int J Med Inf 2016; 94: 112–116.

36.

Parikh

Chudasama

Agarwal

. Race/ethnicity, primary language, and income are not demographic drivers of mortality in breast cancer patients at a diverse safety net academic medical center. Int J Breast Cancer 2015; 2015: e835074.