Implementation of the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D ® ) program via telehealth in Australia: A mixed-methods program evaluation

Abstract

Introduction

We aimed to evaluate the implementation of the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D^®) program via telehealth in Australia using Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance Qualitative Evaluation for Systematic Translation framework.

Methods

Using a convergent mixed-methods design, semi-structured one-on-one interviews with physiotherapist adopters and nonadopters of GLA:D^® via telehealth were analyzed thematically alongside the examination of registry data (1 March 2020–10 February 2022) from patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis completing GLA:D^® via telehealth (telehealth-only) or combined with in-person care (hybrid). Effectiveness was determined as changes from baseline to 3-month follow-up (mean differences, 95% confidence intervals, effect size) for Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12)/Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-12 (HOOS-12), and chair stand test. Group- and individual-level changes were compared to published minimally clinically important change scores.

Results

Twenty-three interviews (12 adopters, 11 nonadopters) found key barriers/facilitators to reach and adoption, high perceived effectiveness, and strategies to support sustainability. Of 2612 registered patients, 85 (3%) and 115 (4%) completed GLA:D^® via telehealth-only or hybrid model, respectively. Most effectiveness outcomes were associated with moderate-large improvements. Group-level changes exceeded minimally clinically important change values for KOOS/HOOS-quality of life and chair stand test. Nearly two out of three patients reached a minimally clinically important change for KOOS/HOOS-quality of life. With telehealth-only and hybrid delivery, 99% (n = 82) and 85% (n = 97) were satisfied/very satisfied. Physiotherapist adoption was limited (n = 128, 6%).

Discussion

GLA:D^® delivered via telehealth is effective, had high patient satisfaction, and was perceived positively by physiotherapist adopters. Addressing low reach and adoption requires further implementation strategies to facilitate greater telehealth opportunities for patients and physiotherapists.

Keywords

Osteoarthritis implementation physiotherapy telehealth exercise program evaluation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Long

Liu

Yin

, et al. Prevalence trends of site-specific osteoarthritis from 1990-2019: findings from the global burden of disease study 2019. Arthritis Rheum 2022; 74: 1172–1183.

Yan

Guo

Zhou

, et al. Health-related quality of life in osteoarthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Health Med 2022; 27: 1859–1874.

Wallis

Webster

Levinger

, et al. What proportion of people with hip and knee osteoarthritis meet physical activity guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthr Carti 2013; 21: 1648–1659.

Willaims

Kamper

Wiggers

, et al. Musculoskeletal conditions may increase the risk of chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. BMC Med 2018; 16: 167.

Uthman

van der Windt

Jordan

, et al. Exercise for lower limb osteoarthritis: systematic review incorporating trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis. Br Med J 2013; 347: f5555.

Goff

Oliveira Silvia

Meroli

, et al. Patient education improves pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis with better effects when combined with exercise therapy: a systematic review. J Physiother 2021; 67: 177–189.

Messier

Resnik

Beavers

, et al.

Intentional weight loss in overweight and obese patients with knee osteoarthritis: is more better?

Arthritis Care Res 2018; 70: 1569–1575.

Nelson

Allen

Golightly

, et al. A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: the chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the U.S. bone and joint initiative. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2014; 43: 701–712.

Ackerman

Skou

Roos

, et al. Implementing a national first-line management program for moderate-severe knee osteoarthritis in Australia: a budget impact analysis focusing on knee replacement avoidance. Osteoarthr Cartil Open 2020; 2: 100070.

10.

Skou

Roos

Laursen

, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of total knee replacement. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1597–1606.

11.

Barton

Kemp

Roos

, et al. Program evaluation of GLA:D® Australia: physiotherapist training outcomes and effectiveness of implementation for people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil Open 2021; 3: 100175.

12.

Skou

Roos

. Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D^TM): evidence-based education and supervised neuromuscular exercise delivered by certified physiotherapists nationwide. BMC Musculosket Disord 2017; 18: 72.

13.

Roos

Gronne

Skou

, et al. Immediate outcomes following the GLA:D® program in Denmark, Canada and Australia: a longitudinal analysis including 28,370 patients with symptomatic knee or hip osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2021; 29: 502–506.

14.

Davis

Kennedy

Wong

, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and implementation of Good Life with osteoarthritis in Denmark (GLA:D): group education and exercise for hip and knee osteoarthritis is feasible in Canada. Osteoarthr Carti 2018; 26: 211–219.

15.

Wallis

Ackerman

Brusco

, et al. Barriers and enablers to uptake of a contemporary guideline-based management program for hip and knee osteoarthritis: a qualitative study. Osteoarthr Cartil Open 2020; 2: 100095.

16.

Dorsey

Topol

. State of telehealth. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 154–161.

17.

Yang

Cai

, et al. Effectiveness of telehealth-based exercise interventions on pain, physical function, and quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Clin Nurs 2022. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16388.

18.

Ezzat

Bell

Kemp

, et al. Much better than I thought it was going to be”: telehealth delivered group-based education and exercise was perceived as acceptable among people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil Open 2022; 4: 100271.

19.

Barton

, Pazzinatto M, Perraton Z, Telehealth-delivered group-based education and exercise-therapy for knee osteoarthritis: a randomised clinical trial interrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. J Med Sports Sci 2022; 25: S67–68.

20.

Forman

Heisler

Damschroder

, et al. Development and application of the RE-AIM QuEST mixed methods framework for program evaluation. Prev Med Rep 2017; 6: 322–328.

21.

Glasgow

Vogt

Boles

. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health 1999; 89: 1322–1327.

22.

Tong

Sainsbury

Craig

. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heal Care 2007; 19: 349–357.

23.

O’Cathain

Murphy

Nicholl

. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Heal Serv Res Policy 2008; 13: 92–98.

24.

Ageberg

Roos

. Neuromuscular exercise as treatment of degenerative knee disease. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2015; 43: 14–22.

25.

Neuromuscular Exercise (NEMEX). Translating research evidence and knowledge, https://nemex.trekeducation.org (2020, accessed 1 March 2023).

26.

Thorne

Kirkham

MacDonald-Emes

. Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Heal 1997; 20: 169–177.

27.

Murray

Treweek

Pope

, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med 2020; 8: 63.

28.

Saunders

Sim

Kingstone

, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant 2018; 52: 1893–1907.

29.

Department of Agriculture Fisheries, and Forestry, Australian Government. Postcode delivery classification, https://www.agriculture.gov.au/biosecurity-trade/import/online-services/delivery-postcode-classifications (2023, accessed 31 August 2022).

30.

Hawker

Miran

Kendzerska

, et al. Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale (CPGS), short form-36 bodily pain scale (SF-36 BPS) and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res 2011; 63: S240–S252.

31.

Gandek

Roos

Franklin

, et al. A 12-item short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Osteoarthr Cartil 2019; 27: 762–770.

32.

Dobson

Hinman

Roos

, et al. OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 2013; 21: 1042–1052.

33.

Cohen

. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155–159.

34.

Salaffi

Stancati

Silvestri

, et al. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain 2004; 8: 283–291.

35.

Eckhard

Munir

Wood

, et al. Minimal important change and minimum clinically important difference values of the KOOS-12 after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2021; 29: 541–546.

36.

Wright

Cook

Baxter

, et al. A comparison of 3 methodological approaches to defining major clinically important improvements of 4 performance measures in patients with hip osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sport Phys Ther 2011; 41: 319–327.

37.

GLA:D Australia. 2021 Annual Report, https://gladaustralia.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Final-version-GLAD-Annual-Report-2021.pdf (accessed 23 August 2022).

38.

Miller

Pak

Keller

, et al. Evaluation of pragmatic telehealth physical therapy implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Phys Ther 2021; 101: 1–10.

39.

Barton

Ezzat

Meroli

, et al. “It’s second best”: a mixed-methods evaluation of the experiences and attitudes of people with musculoskeletal pain towards physiotherapist delivered telehealth during COVID-19 pandemic. Musculosklet Sci Pr 2022; 58: 102500.

40.

Malliaras

Merolli

Williams

, et al. It’s not hands-on therapy, so its very limited: telehealth use and views among allied health clinicians during the coronavirus pandemic. Musculosklet Sci Pr 2021; 52: 102340.

41.

Bennell

Lawford

Metcalf

, et al. Physiotherapists and patients report positive experiences overall with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study. J Physiother 2021; 67: 201–209.

42.

Ezzat

Esculier

Ferguson

, et al. Canadian physiotherapists integrate virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physiother Caanda 2022. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2022-0092.

43.

Haines

Sawyer

McKInnon

, et al. Barriers and enablers to telehealth used by physiotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physiotherapy 2023; 118: 12–19.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB