Telemedicine may help improve older adults' access, health outcomes, and quality of life indicators. This review aims to provide current evidence on the effectiveness of telemedicine in the aged population.
Method
A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science electronic databases between January 2015 and September 2021 using the keywords “telemedicine” or “telehealth” and “older people” or “geriatrics” or “elderly.” The articles were classified under three headings according to the purposes: feasibility, diagnosis and management of chronic diseases, and patient satisfaction.
Results
A total of 22 articles were included. Across most disciplines, evidence has shown that telemedicine is as effective as usual care, if not more so, in the feasibility, chronic disease management, and patient satisfaction of the elderly. However, a few studies reported challenges such as difficulty with technology, hearing problems, and the inability to perform hands-on examinations for physicians.
Conclusion
Findings from this review support the view that health care providers can use telemedicine to manage elderly individuals in conjunction with usual health care. However, future research is needed to eliminate barriers to increasing telemedicine use among older adults.
WeissCOBoydCMYuQ, et al.Patterns of prevalent major chronic disease among older adults in the United States. Jama2007; 298: 1158–1162.
3.
FriedTRTinettiMEIannoneL. Primary care clinicians’ experiences with treatment decision making for older persons with multiple conditions. Arch Intern Med2011; 171: 75–80.
4.
DoraiswamySMamtaniRAmeduriM, et al.Respiratory epidemics and older people. Age Ageing2020; 49: 896–900.
5.
Schrack JA, Wanigatunga AA, Juraschek SP. After the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Next Wave of Health Challenges for Older Adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2020 Sep 16; 75(9): e121–e122.
6.
HiltyDMFerrerDCParishMB, et al.The effectiveness of telemental health: a 2013 review. Telemedicine and e-Health2013; 19: 444–454.
7.
KangHGMahoneyDFHoenigH, et al.In situ monitoring of health in older adults: technologies and issues. J Am Geriatr Soc2010; 58: 1579–1586.
8.
Martínez-GonzálezNABerchtoldPUllmanK, et al.Integrated care programmes for adults with chronic conditions: a meta-review. Int J Qual Health Care2014; 26: 561–570.
9.
MerrellRC. Geriatric telemedicine: background and evidence for telemedicine as a way to address the challenges of geriatrics. Healthc Inform Res2015; 21: 223–229.
10.
WongAKCWongFKYChowKKS, et al.Effect of a telecare case management program for older adults Who Are homebound during the COVID-19 pandemic: a pilot randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open2021; 4: e2123453–e2123453.
11.
ColbertGBVenegas-VeraAVLermaEV. Utility of telemedicine in the COVID-19 era. Rev Cardiovasc Med2020; 21: 583–587.
12.
MannDMChenJChunaraR, et al.COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: evidence from the field. J Am Med Inform Assoc2020; 27: 1132–1135.
13.
HincapiéMAGallegoJCGempelerA, et al.Implementation and usefulness of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. J Prim Care Community Health2020; 11: 2150132720980612.
14.
BitarHAlismailS. The role of eHealth, telehealth, and telemedicine for chronic disease patients during COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid systematic review. Digital Health2021; 7: 20552076211009396.
15.
MarraDEHamletKMBauerRM, et al.Validity of teleneuropsychology for older adults in response to COVID-19: a systematic and critical review. Clin Neuropsychol2020; 34: 1411–1452.
16.
ElsnerP. Teledermatology in the times of COVID-19–a systematic review. JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft2020; 18: 841–845.
17.
KolcunJPGRyuWHATraynelisVC. Systematic review of telemedicine in spine surgery. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine2020; 34: 161–170.
18.
PetersenWKarpinskiKBackhausLBierkeSHänerM. A systematic review about telemedicine in orthopedics. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2021 Oct; 141(10): 1731–1739.
19.
Yi JS, Pittman CA, Price CL, Nieman CL and Oh ES. Telemedicine and Dementia Care: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Facilitators. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021 Jul; 22(7): 1396–1402.e18.
20.
KruseCFohnJWilsonN, et al.Utilization barriers and medical outcomes commensurate with the use of telehealth among older adults: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform2020; 8: e20359.
21.
SekhonHSekhonKLaunayC, et al.Telemedicine and the rural dementia population: a systematic review. Maturitas2021; 143: 105–114.
22.
Rezapour A, Hosseinijebeli SS, Faradonbeh SB. Economic evaluation of E-health interventions compared with alternative treatments in older persons' care: A systematic review. J Educ Health Promot 2021 May 20; 10: 134.
23.
AlessiJde OliveiraGBFrancoDW, et al.Telehealth strategy to mitigate the negative psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Diabetol2021; 58: 899–909.
24.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ, et al.The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol2009; 62: e1–e34.
25.
van den BergNSchumannMKraftK, et al.Telemedicine and telecare for older patients—a systematic review. Maturitas2012; 73: 94–114.
26.
PowersBBHomerMCMoroneN, et al.Creation of an interprofessional teledementia clinic for rural veterans: preliminary data. J Am Geriatr Soc2017; 65: 1092–1099.
27.
Bohingamu MudiyanselageSStevensJWattsJJ, et al.Personalised telehealth intervention for chronic disease management: a pilot randomised controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare2019; 25: 343–352.
28.
BeckCABeranDBBiglanKM, et al.National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for parkinson disease. Neurology2017; 89: 1152–1161.
29.
ShahMNWassermanEBWangH, et al.High-intensity telemedicine decreases emergency department use by senior living community residents. Telemedicine and e-Health2016; 22: 251–258.
30.
EgedeLEGebregziabherMWalkerRJ, et al.Trajectory of cost overtime after psychotherapy for depression in older veterans via telemedicine. J Affect Disord2017; 207: 157–162.
31.
LillicrapLHunterCGoldswainP. Improving geriatric care and reducing hospitalisations in regional and remote areas: the benefits of telehealth. J Telemed Telecare2021; 27: 397–408.
32.
VedelIAkhlaghpourSVaghefiI, et al.Health information technologies in geriatrics and gerontology: a mixed systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc2013; 20: 1109–1119.
33.
PowersJSBucknerJ. Reaching out to rural caregivers and veterans with dementia utilizing clinical video-telehealth. Geriatrics2018; 3: 29.
34.
DangSGomez-OrozcoCAvan ZuilenMH, et al.Providing dementia consultations to veterans using clinical video telehealth: results from a clinical demonstration project. Telemedicine and e-Health2018; 24: 203–209.
35.
HastingsSNMahannaEPBerkowitzTS, et al.Video-enhanced care management for medically complex older adults with cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc2021; 69: 77–84.
36.
EgedeLEAciernoRKnappRG, et al.Psychotherapy for depression in older veterans via telemedicine: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet Psychiatry2015; 2: 693–701.
37.
DiNapoliEAPierpaoliCMShahA, et al.Effects of home-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression on anxiety symptoms among rural, ethnically diverse older adults. Clin Gerontol2017; 40: 181–190.
38.
EgedeLEWalkerRJPayneEH, et al.Effect of psychotherapy for depression via home telehealth on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial. J Telemed Telecare2018; 24: 596–602.
39.
GroschMCWeinerMFHynanLS, et al.Video teleconference-based neurocognitive screening in geropsychiatry. Psychiatry Res2015; 225: 734–735.
40.
CheongC-KLimK-HJangJ-W, et al.The effect of telemedicine on the duration of treatment in dementia patients. J Telemed Telecare2015; 21: 214–218.
41.
KimHJhooJHJangJ-W. The effect of telemedicine on cognitive decline in patients with dementia. J Telemed Telecare2017; 23: 149–154.
42.
CarotenutoAReaRTrainiE, et al.Cognitive assessment of patients with alzheimer’s disease by telemedicine: pilot study. JMIR Ment Health2018; 5: e8097.
43.
WadsworthHEDhimaKWomackKB, et al.Validity of teleneuropsychological assessment in older patients with cognitive disorders. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2018; 33: 1040–1045.
44.
WadsworthHEGalusha-GlasscockJMWomackKB, et al.Remote neuropsychological assessment in rural American Indians with and without cognitive impairment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol2016; 31: 420–425.
45.
MarescaGDe ColaMCCaliriS, et al.Moving towards novel multidisciplinary approaches for improving elderly quality of life: the emerging role of telemedicine in sicily. J Telemed Telecare2019; 25: 318–324.
46.
SoodAWattsSAJohnsonJK, et al.Telemedicine consultation for patients with diabetes mellitus: a cluster randomised controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare2018; 24: 385–391.
47.
IshaniAChristopherJPalmerD, et al.Telehealth by an interprofessional team in patients with CKD: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis2016; 68: 41–49.
48.
MammenJRElsonMJJavaJJ, et al.Patient and physician perceptions of virtual visits for Parkinson’s disease: a qualitative study. Telemedicine and e-Health2018; 24: 255–267.
49.
GentryMTLapidMIRummansTA. Geriatric telepsychiatry: systematic review and policy considerations. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry2019; 27: 109–127.
50.
MurphyRPDennehyKACostelloMM, et al.Virtual geriatric clinics and the COVID-19 catalyst: a rapid review. Age Ageing2020; 49: 907–914.
51.
KlaassenBvan BeijnumBJHermensHJ. Usability in telemedicine systems—A literature survey. Int J Med Inf2016; 93: 57–69.
52.
GreenbergAJHaneyDBlakeKD, et al.Differences in access to and use of electronic personal health information between rural and urban residents in the United States. J Rural Health2018; 34: s30–s38.
NarasimhaSMadathilKCAgnisarmanS, et al.Designing telemedicine systems for geriatric patients: a review of the usability studies. Telemedicine and e-Health2017; 23: 459–472.
55.
EdirippuligeSMartin-KhanMBeattieE, et al.A systematic review of telemedicine services for residents in long term care facilities. J Telemed Telecare2013; 19: 127–132.
56.
Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, Lewis R. Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD002098.
57.
LohPSabesanSAllenD, et al.Practical aspects of telehealth: financial considerations. Intern Med J2013; 43: 829–834.
58.
WhittenPSMairFSHaycoxA, et al.Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. Br Med J2002; 324: 1434–1437.
59.
BashshurRLShannonGWSmithBR, et al.The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions for chronic disease management. Telemedicine and e-Health2014; 20: 769–800.
60.
WoottonR. Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management–an evidence synthesis. J Telemed Telecare2012; 18: 211–220.
61.
Gao W, Lv X, Xu X, Zhang Z, Yan J, Mao G, Xing W. Telemedicine intervention-reduced blood pressure in a chronic disease population: A meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2020 Oct 12: 1357633X20959581.
62.
GrayLCEdirippuligeSSmithAC, et al.Telehealth for nursing homes: the utilization of specialist services for residential care. J Telemed Telecare2012; 18: 142–146.
63.
SeifertABatsisJASmithAC. Telemedicine in long-term care facilities during and beyond COVID-19: challenges caused by the digital divide. Front Public Health2020; 8: 690.
