Few studies have reported information related to the cost-effectiveness of traditional face-to-face treatments for aphasia. The emergence and demand for telepractice approaches to aphasia treatment has resulted in an urgent need to understand the costs and cost-benefits of this approach.
Methods
Eighteen stroke survivors with aphasia completed community-based aphasia telerehabilitation treatment, utilizing the Language-Oriented Treatment (LOT) delivered via Webex videoconferencing program. Marginal benefits to treatment were calculated as the change in Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R) score pre- and post-treatment and marginal cost of treatment was calculated as the relationship between change in WAB-R aphasia quotient (AQ) and the average cost per treatment. Controlling for demographic variables, Bayesian estimation evaluated the primary contributors to WAB-R change and assessed cost-effectiveness of treatment by aphasia type.
Results
Thirteen out of 18 participants experienced significant improvement in WAB-R AQ following telerehabilitation delivered therapy. Compared to anomic aphasia (reference group), those with conduction aphasia had relatively similar levels of improvement whereas those with Broca’s aphasia had smaller improvement. Those with global aphasia had the largest improvement. Each one-point of improvement cost between US$89 and US$864 for those who improved (mean = US$200) depending on aphasia type/severity.
Discussion
Individuals with severe aphasia may have the greatest gains per unit cost from treatment. Both improvement magnitude and the cost per unit of improvement were driven by aphasia type, severity and race. Economies of scale to aphasia treatment–cost may be minimized by treating a variety of types of aphasia at various levels of severity.
ArmstrongEFoxSWilkinsonR. Mild aphasia: Is this the place for an argument?
Am J Speech-Language Pathol. Epub ahead of print 1 May 2013. DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0084)
3.
Armstrong E, Fox S and Wilkinson R. Mild aphasia: is this the place for an argument? Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2013: 22(2): S268–S278.
4.
DalemansRJPDe WitteLPBeurskensAJHM, et al. An investigation into the social participation of stroke survivors with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil2010;
32: 1678–1685.
5.
RoquerJCampelloARGomisM.Sex differences in first-ever acute stroke. Stroke2003;
34: 1581–1585.
6.
DickeyLKaganALindsayMP, et al.
Incidence and profile of inpatient stroke-induced aphasia in Ontario, Canada. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010:
91: 196–202.
7.
TsouliSKyritsisAPTsagalisG, et al.
Significance of aphasia after first-ever acute stroke: Impact on early and late outcomes. Neuroepidemiology2009;
33: 96–102.
8.
Lalor E and Cranfield E (2004) Aphasia: a description of the incidence and management in the acute hospital setting. Asia Pacific J Speech, Language Hearing 2004; 9: 129–136.
9.
Engelter ST, Gostynski M, Papa S, et al. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis. Stroke 2006; 37: 1379–1384.
10.
Béjot Y, Troisgros O, Gremeaux V, et al. Poststroke disposition and associated factors in a population-based study: the Dijon Stroke Registry. Stroke 2012; 43(8): 2071–2077.
11.
Ellis C, Hardy RY, Lindrooth RC, et al. Rate of aphasia among stroke patients discharged from hospitals in the United States. Aphasiology 2018; 32: 1075–1086.
Guyomard V, Fulcher RA, Redmayne O, et al. Effect of dysphasia and dysphagia on inpatient mortality and hospital length of stay: a database study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57: 2101–2106.
14.
Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018; 137: e67–e492.
15.
Ellis C, Simpson AN, Bonilha H, et al. The one-year attributable cost of poststroke aphasia. Stroke 2012; 43(5): 1429–1431.
16.
Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, et al. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD000425. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4 (accessed 18 December 2020).
17.
FlowersHLSkoretzSASilverFL, et al.
Poststroke aphasia frequency, recovery, and outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2016;
97: 2188–2201.e8.
18.
YangSN.Current evidence for post stroke aphasia treatment. Brain Neurorehabil2017;
10: e15.
19.
Ellis C, Hardy RY, Lindrooth RC, et al. Racial-differences in speech-language pathology utilization and cost among persons with aphasia in the stroke belt. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: E94–E95.
20.
Ellis C, Hardy RY, Lindrooth RC. Greater healthcare utilization and costs among Black persons compared to White persons with aphasia in the North Carolina stroke belt. J Neurol Sci 2017; 376: 76–83.
21.
Ellis C, Peach RK, Hardy RY, et al. The influence of race on SLP utilisation and costs among persons with aphasia. Aphasiology 2017; 31: 1433–1440.
22.
Ellis C, Lindrooth RC, Horner J. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for aphasia: an approach using experimental data. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2014; 23: 186–195.
23.
Palmer R, Enderby P, Cooper C, et al. Computer therapy compared with usual care for people with long-standing aphasia poststroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2012; 43: 1904–1911.
24.
Wenke R, Lawrie M, Hobson T, et al. Feasibility and cost analysis of implementing high intensity aphasia clinics within a sub-acute setting. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2014; 16: 250–259.
25.
ProtectionPActAC.Patient protection and affordable care act. Public Law2010;
111: 119.
26.
Hall N, Boisvert M, Steele R. Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with aphasia: a systematic review. Int J Telerehabil 2013; 5: 27–38.
27.
BroomeS. NCHA workforce report. Raleigh: North Carolina Hospital, https://www.ncha.org/doc/42 (2010, accessed 7 October 2020).
28.
Fairweather GC, Lincoln MA, Ramsden R. Speech-language pathology teletherapy in rural and remote educational settings: Decreasing service inequities. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2016; 18: 592–602.
29.
HillAJMillerLE.A survey of the clinical use of telehealth in speech-language pathology across Australia. J Clin Pract Speech Lang Pathol2012;
14: 110–117.
30.
Theodoros DG. Telerehabilitation for service delivery in speech-language pathology. J Telemed Telecare 2008;14(5): 221–224.
31.
McCue M, Fairman A, Pramuka M. Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2010; 21: 195–205.
32.
Weidner K, Lowman J. Telepractice for adult speech-language pathology services: A systematic review. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups 2020; 5: 326–338.
33.
Dechêne L, Tousignant M, Boissy P, et al. Simulated in-home teletreatment for anomia. Int J Telerehabil 2011; 3: 3–10.
34.
Choi YH, Park HK, Paik NJ. A telerehabilitation approach for chronic aphasia following stroke. Telemed J E Health 2016; 22(5): 434–440.
35.
Kurland J, Liu A, Stokes P. Effects of a tablet-based home practice program With telepractice on treatment outcomes in chronic aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2018; 61: 1140–1156.
36.
Kurland J, Liu A, Stokes P. Effects of a tablet-based home practice program with telepractice on treatment outcomes in chronic aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2018; 61(5): 1140–1156.
37.
Woolf C, Caute A, Haigh Z, et al. A comparison of remote therapy, face to face therapy and an attention control intervention for people with aphasia: a quasi-randomised controlled feasibility study. Clin Rehabil 2016; 30: 359–373.
38.
FridlerNRosenKHerzbergO, et al. Tele-rehabilitation therapy vs. face-to-face therapy for aphasic patients. In: eTELEMED 2012: The Fourth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine. IARIA, Valencia, 2012, pp. 18–23.
39.
Agostini M, Garzon M, Benavides-Varela S, et al. Telerehabilitation in poststroke anomia. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 706909. DOI: 10.1155/2014/706909.
40.
BradfordNKCafferyLJSmithAC. Telehealth services in rural and remote Australia: A systematic review of models of care and factors influencing success and sustainability. Rural Remote Health 2016; 16: 3808.
41.
Lee H, Lee Y, Choi H, Pyun SB. Community integration and quality of life in aphasia after stroke. Yonsei Med J 2015; 56: 1694–1702.
42.
Manning M, MacFarlane A, Hickey A, Franklin S. Perspectives of people with aphasia post-stroke towards personal recovery and living successfully: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0214200.
43.
Manning M, MacFarlane A, Hickey A, et al. Perspectives of people with aphasia post-stroke towards personal recovery and living successfully: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. PLoS One 2019; 14(3): e0214200. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214200.
44.
Babashamsi P, Md Yusoff NI, Ceylan H, et al. Evaluation of pavement life cycle cost analysis: Review and analysis. Int J Pavement Res Technol 2016; 9: 241–254.
45.
Tam A, Mac S, Isaranuwatchai W, Bayley M. Cost-effectiveness of a high-intensity rapid access outpatient stroke rehabilitation program. Int J Rehabil Res 2019; 42: 56–62.
46.
KerteszA.Western Aphasia Battery-Revised.
San Antonio:
The Psychological Corporation, 2007.
47.
Wang X, He CZ, Sun D. Bayesian population estimation for small sample capture-recapture data using noninformative priors. J Stat Plan Inference 2007; 137: 1099–1118.
48.
BandurDL, M. SC.Language-oriented treatment: A psycholinguistic approach to aphasia. In: DuffyJRMcNeilMR (eds) Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008, pp. 756–799.
49.
DuffyJ.Motor Speech Disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management.
St. Louis:
Elsevier Mosby, 2005.
50.
Brydges CR, Gaeta L. An introduction to calculating Bayes factors in JASP for speech, language, and hearing research. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2019; 62: 4523–4533.
51.
McMillanGPCannonJB. Bayesian applications in auditory research. J Speech Lang Hear Res. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-ASTM-18-0228.
52.
Nalborczyk L, Batailler C, Loevenbruck H, et al. An introduction to Bayesian multilevel models using brms: A case study of gender effects on vowel variability in standard Indonesian. J Speech Lang Hear Res. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0006.
53.
DooganCDignamJCoplandD, et al.
Aphasia Recovery: When, how and who to treat?Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep2018;
18, 90.
54.
Katz RC, Wertz RT. The efficacy of computer-provided reading treatment for chronic aphasic adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40: 493–507.
55.
Aftonomos LB, Appelbaum JS, Steele RD. Improving outcomes for persons with aphasia in advanced community-based treatment programs. Stroke 1999; 30: 1370–1379.
56.
Ellis C, Peach RK. Racial differences in the Boston naming test among persons with aphasia: disparity or diagnostic inaccuracy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97: E108.
57.
Ellis C and Peach RK. Life satisfaction and aphasia: an integrative review with recommendations for future research. Aphasiology 2017; 31: 631–642.
58.
Wertz RT, Auther LL and Ross KB. Aphasia in African-Americans and Caucasians: severity, improvement, and rate of improvement. Aphasiology 1997; 11: 533–542.
59.
Putman K, Horn S, Smout R, et al. Racial disparities in stroke functional outcomes upon discharge from inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32: 1604–1611.
60.
MakinSDJTurpinSDennisMS, et al. Cognitive impairment after lacunar stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, prevalence and comparison with other stroke subtypes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Epub ahead of print 2013. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303645.
van de Schoot R, Broere JJ, Perryck KH, et al. Analyzing small data sets using Bayesian estimation: the case of posttraumatic stress symptoms following mechanical ventilation in burn survivors. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2015; 6: 25216.
63.
Asendorpf JB, Conner M, De Fruyt F, et al. Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. Eur J Personality 2013; 27: 108–119.
