Patient reported outcomes with remote orthopaedic consultations by telemedicine: A randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Introduction

Decentralised services through outreach clinics or modern technology reduce patient travel time and cost to society. Telemedicine consultation through videoconference is one such modality. Here, we compared patient-reported health outcomes and satisfaction between video-assisted remote and standard face-to-face orthopaedic consultations.

Methods

This randomised controlled trial included two parallel groups: (1) patients receiving video-assisted remote consultation at a regional medical centre (RMC); and (2) patients receiving standard consultation at the orthopaedic outpatient clinic of the University Hospital of North Norway (UNN). This study included patients referred to or scheduled for a consultation at the orthopaedic outpatient clinic. After each consultation, patient satisfaction was determined using patient-completed questionnaires containing questions on patient-reported health (three-level European quality of life five-dimension index (EQ-5D-3L)/European quality of life visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS)) and questions from a validated OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ).

Results

This study included 389 patients, of which 199 received remote consultation and 190 received standard consultation (total of 559 consultations). In all, 99% RMC-randomised patients and 99% UNN-randomised patients evaluated the consultation as very satisfactory or satisfactory. Moreover, 86% RMC-randomised patients preferred video-assisted consultation as the next consultation. No difference was observed in patient-reported health after 12 months between the two groups. EQ-5D index scores were 0.77 and 0.75 for RMC- and UNN-randomised patients, respectively (p = 0.42).

Discussion

We did not observe any difference in patient-reported satisfaction and health (EQ-5D/EQ-VAS) between video-assisted and standard consultations, suggesting that video-assisted remote consultation can be safely offered to some orthopaedic patients. Moreover, a significantly high proportion of patients selected video-assisted remote consultation as their next consultation, thus strengthening the findings of this study. However, economic aspects should be assessed before widely recommending video-assisted consultation.

Keywords

Telemedicine patient satisfaction remote consultations outpatients videoconference randomised controlled trial orthopaedic quality of life

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services. Meld. St. 16 (2010-2011) report to the Storting (white paper). Summary – National Health and Care Services Plan (2011–2015), https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/meld-st-16-20102011/id639794/ (2011, accessed 15 January 2018).

Kristiansen FB. Reported from UNN’s Centre for Financial Affairs (2014, 8 October). (Personal communication).

Tachakra

Lynch

Newson

, et al. A comparison of telemedicine with face-to-face consultations for trauma management. J Telemed Telecare 2000; 6(Suppl 1): S178–S181.

Benger

Noble

Coast

, et al. The safety and effectiveness of minor injuries telemedicine. Emerg Med J 2004; 21: 438–445.

Brennan

Kealy

Gerardi

, et al. Telemedicine in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 1999; 5: 18–22.

Haukipuro

Ohinmaa

Winblad

, et al. The feasibility of telemedicine for orthopaedic outpatient clinics–a randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare 2000; 6: 193–198.

Couturier

Tyrrell

Tonetti

, et al. Feasibility of orthopaedic teleconsulting in a geriatric rehabilitation service. J Telemed Telecare 1998; 4(Suppl 1): 85–87.

Aarnio

Lamminen

Lepisto

, et al. A prospective study of teleconferencing for orthopaedic consultations. J Telemed Telecare 1999; 5: 62–66.

Vuolio

Winblad

Ohinmaa

, et al. Videoconferencing for orthopaedic outpatients: one-year follow-up. J Telemed Telecare 2003; 9: 8–11.

10.

Lambrecht

Canham

Gattey

, et al. Telemedicine and orthopaedic care. A review of 2 years of experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998; 348: 228–232.

11.

Ohno

Watanabe

Okada

, et al. Practical experience of telehealth between an Antarctic station and Japan. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18: 473–475.

12.

Hailey

Roine

Ohinmaa

. Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002; 8(Suppl 1): 1–30.

13.

Taylor

. Evaluating telemedicine systems and services. J Telemed Telecare 2005; 11: 167–177.

14.

Hersh

Helfand

Wallace

, et al. Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2001; 1: 5–5.

15.

Currell

Urquhart

Wainwright

, et al. Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Nurs Times 2001; 97: 35–35.

16.

Flodgren

Rachas

Farmer

, et al. Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 9: Cd002098–Cd002098.

17.

Williams

May

Esmail

. Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telehealthcare: a systematic review of the literature. Telemed J E Health 2001; 7: 293–316.

18.

Mair

Whitten

. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000; 320: 1517–1520.

19.

Whitten

Love

. Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. J Postgrad Med 2005; 51: 294–300.

20.

Shivji

Metcalfe

Khan

, et al. Pediatric surgery telehealth: patient and clinician satisfaction. Pediatr Surg Int 2011; 27: 523–526.

21.

Sathiyakumar

Apfeld

Obremskey

, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial using telemedicine for follow-ups in an orthopedic trauma population: a pilot study. J Orthopaedic Trauma 2015; 29: e139–145.

22.

Buvik

Bugge

Knutsen

, et al. Quality of care for remote orthopaedic consultations using telemedicine: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2016; 16: 483–483.

23.

Garratt

Bjaertnes

Krogstad

, et al. The OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ): data quality, reliability, and validity in patients attending 52 Norwegian hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 433–437.

24.

Wisloff

Hagen

Hamidi

, et al. Estimating QALY gains in applied studies: a review of cost-utility analyses published in 2010. PharmacoEconomics 2014; 32: 367–375.

25.

Tidermark

Bergstrom

Svensson

, et al. Responsiveness of the EuroQol (EQ 5-D) and the SF-36 in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 1069–1079.

26.

Dolan

. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997; 35: 1095–1108.

27.

Teunis

Thornton

Jayakumar

, et al. Time seeing a hand surgeon is not associated with patient satisfaction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473: 2362–2368.

28.

Quintana

Gonzalez

Bilbao

, et al. Predictors of patient satisfaction with hospital health care. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6: 102–102.

29.

Nielsen

Gill

Ricketts

. Satisfaction levels in orthopaedic out-patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2005; 87: 106–108.

30.

Wallace

Haines

Harrison

, et al. Joint teleconsultations (virtual outreach) versus standard outpatient appointments for patients referred by their general practitioner for a specialist opinion: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 1961–1968.

31.

Zandbelt

Smets

Oort

, et al. Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter: a comparison of patients’ and physicians’ views. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 1088–1095.

32.

Scott Kruse

Karem

Shifflett

, et al. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2018; 24: 4–12.

33.

Akobeng

. Understanding randomised controlled trials. Arch Dis Child 2005; 90: 840–844.

34.

Abtahi

Presson

Zhang

, et al. Association between orthopaedic outpatient satisfaction and non-modifiable patient factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97: 1041–1048.

35.

Chow

Mayer

Darzi

, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery 2009; 146: 435–443.

36.

Waters

Edmondston

Yates

, et al. Identification of factors influencing patient satisfaction with orthopaedic outpatient clinic consultation: a qualitative study. Man Ther 2016; 25: 48–55.

37.

Morgan

Kosteniuk

Stewart

, et al. The telehealth satisfaction scale: reliability, validity, and satisfaction with telehealth in a rural memory clinic population. Telemed J E Health 2014; 20: 997–1003.