Managing professional knowledge boundaries during ECHO telementoring consultations in two Veterans Affairs specialty care liver clinics: A theme-oriented discourse analysis

Abstract

Introduction

Consultations are the traditional method of communication between generalist and specialist providers managing patients with specialty care needs. Traditional written consultations have limitations, including inadequate clinical information and inappropriate, or unclear consultation questions. Teleconsultations minimize these limitations through real-time communication between generalist and specialist providers to actively manage professional knowledge boundaries about specialty care problems.

Methods

We video-recorded 37 teleconsultation sessions, resulting in 115 consultations between generalist and specialty care providers participating in Veterans Affairs (VA) Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) liver clinics. Data were collected at two US sites across nine months to observe consultation communication among 33 primary care generalists and three liver specialists. Video recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using theme-oriented discourse analysis to characterize consultation question content and format.

Results

Generalists' consultation question content addressed a range of topics, including treatment, diagnosis, interpreting results, patient communication, screening and surveillance, and care coordination. Some generalists relied on descriptive narratives rather than a specific question to convey complex patient cases. Consultation question format showed nearly even division between targeting general medical knowledge and specialty care knowledge domains, including specialty care, medical, organizational, and experiential knowledge.

Discussion

Timely access to specialists through teleconsultation has the potential to transform specialty care delivery. This article examines provider-to-provider interactions to understand how the communication process contributes to knowledge management during teleconsultations. Video studies of health information technology use provide a rich opportunity for analysing real-time communication that may help improve cross-specialty collaboration and the coordinated management of patients with specialty care needs.

Keywords

Telementoring ECHO model interprofessional communication medical decision-making qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Salerno

. Principles of effective consultation: an update for the 21st-century consultant. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167(3): 271.

Donohoe

Kravitz

Wheeler

et al.

Reasons for outpatient referrals from generalists to specialists. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14(5): 281–286.

Pearson

. Principles of generalist-specialist relationships. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14(S1): S13–S20.

Sears

Charlson

. The effectiveness of a consultation. Am J Med 1983; 74(5): 870–876.

O'Malley

Reschovsky

. Referral and consultation communication between primary care and specialist physicians: finding common ground. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171(1): 65–67.

Goldman

. Ten commandments for effective consultations. Arch Intern Med 1983; 143(9): 1753.

Barnett

. Trends in physician referrals in the United States, 1999-2009. Arch Intern Med 2012; 172(2): 163.

Ofstad

Frich

Schei

et al.

What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2016; 6(2): e010098.

Osheroff

Forsythe

Buchanan

et al.

Physicians' information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114(7): 576.

10.

Harrison

Clayton

Wallace

. Can telemedicine be used to improve communication between primary and secondary care?. BMJ 1996; 313(7069): 1377–80.

11.

Hungin

Seifert

. Poor communication between clinicians - poor care for patients!. Dig Liver Dis 2004; 36: 309–310.

12.

Berendsen

Benneker

WHGM

Schuling

et al.

Collaboration with general practitioners: preferences of medical specialists – a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6(1): 155.

13.

Arora

Thornton

Murata

et al.

Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers. N Engl J Med 2011; 364(23): 2199–2207.

14.

Gordon

Fink

Fischer

. Telenephrology: a novel approach to improve coordinated and collaborative care for chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 28(4): 972–981.

15.

Vlek

JFM

Vierhout

WPM

Knottnerus

et al.

A randomised controlled trial of joint consultations with general practitioners and cardiologists in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2003; 53(487): 108–112.

16.

Del Fiol

Workman

Gorman

. Clinical questions raised by clinicians at the point of care: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174(5): 710.

17.

Ely

Osheroff

Gorman

et al.

A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study. BMJ 2000; 321(7258): 429–432.

18.

Yu H, Sable C and Zhu HR (eds). Classifying medical questions based on an evidence taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the AAAI 2005 workshop on question answering in restricted domains, 2005.

19.

Bowling

Redfern

. The process of outpatient referral and care: the experiences and views of patients, their general practitioners, and specialists. Br J Gen Pract 2000; 50(451): 116–120.

20.

Donohoe

. Comparing generalist and specialty care - discrepancies, deficiencies, and excesses. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(15): 1596–1608.

21.

Lingard

Hodges

Macrae

et al.

Expert and trainee determinations of rhetorical relevance in referral and consultation letters. Med Educ 2004; 38(2): 168–176.

22.

Kvamme

Olesen

Samuelsson

. Improving the interface between primary and secondary care: a statement from the European Working Party on Quality in Family Practice (EQuiP). Qual Health Care 2001; 10(1): 33–39.

23.

Arora

Geppert

CMA

Kalishman

et al.

Academic health center management of chronic diseases through knowledge networks: Project ECHO. Acad Med 2007; 82(2): 154–160.

24.

Arora

Kalishman

Thornton

et al.

Expanding access to hepatitis C virus treatment - extension for community healthcare outcomes (ECHO) project: disruptive innovation in specialty care. Hepatology 2010; 52(3): 1124–1133.

25.

Khatri

Haddad

Anderson

. Project ECHO: replicating a novel model to enhance access to hepatitis c care in a community health center. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2013; 24(2): 850–858.

26.

Knapp

Pangarkar

. Utilizing the ECHO model in the veterans health affairs system: guidelines for setup, operations and preliminary findings. Future Internet 2015; 7(2): 184–195.

27.

Scott

Unruh

Catlin

et al.

Project ECHO: a model for complex, chronic care in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18(8): 481–484.

28.

Frank

Carey

Fagan

et al.

Evaluation of a telementoring intervention for pain management in the veterans health administration. Pain Med 2015; 16(6): 1090–1100.

29.

Aron

. QUERI Evaluation Center Report: VA Specialty Care Access Network Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (SCAN-ECHO), Washington, D.C: VA Office of Specialty Care and Health Services Research & Development Evaluation Center, 2014, 2014.

30.

Kirsh

Aron

. Providing specialty consultant expertise to primary care: an expanding spectrum of modalities. Mayo Clin Proc 2014; 89(10): 1416–1426.

31.

Stevenson

Ball

Haverhals

et al.

Evaluation of a national telemedicine initiative in the Veterans Health Administration: factors associated with successful implementation. J Telemed Telecare 2014. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1357633X16677676.

32.

Roberts

Sarangi

. Theme-oriented discourse analysis of medical encounters. Med Educ 2005; 39(6): 632–735.

33.

Sarangi

Practicing discourse analysis in healthcare settings. In: Bourgeault

Dingwall

de Vries

(eds). The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2010, pp. 397–416.

34.

Sarangi

Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: the case of genetic counseling. In: Coulthard

Sarangi

(eds). Discourse and social life, New York: Longman, 2000, pp. 1–27.

35.

Shaw

Bailey

. Discourse analysis: what is it and why is it relevant to family practice?. Fam Pract 2009; 26(5): 413–439.

36.

Koenig

Trupin

et al.

An exploratory typology of provider responses that encourage and discourage conversation about complementary and integrative medicine during routine oncology visits. Patient Educ Couns 2015; 98(7): 857–863.

37.

Heritage

Maynard

. Communication in medical care: Interaction between physicians and patients, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

38.

Drew

Heritage

. Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

39.

Woods

. Transana software for qualitative analysis of audio and video., 2.4 ed. WI, USA: Winconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin at Madison, 2008.

40.

Heath

Luff

Sanchez Svensson

. Video and qualitative research: analysing medical practice and interaction. Med Educ 2007; 41(1): 109–116.

41.

Koenig

Wenger

Graham

et al.

Describing the ‘learning loop’: an overall structural organization of video consutlations between specialist and generalist providers for specialty care liver problems. TPM Test Psychom Methodol Appl Psychol 2016; 23(4): 429–451.

42.

Ely

Burch

Vinson

. The information needs of family physicians: case-specific clinical questions. J Fam Pract 1992; 35: 265–269.

43.

Ely

Osheroff

Ebell

et al.

Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care. BMJ 1999; 319(7206): 358–361.

44.

Richardson

Wilson

Nishikawa

et al.

The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club 1995; 123: A12.

45.

Katzman

Comerci

Boyle

et al.

Innovative telementoring for pain management: Project EHO Pain. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2014; 34(1): 68–75.

46.

Lundvoll Nilsen

. Collaboration and learning in medical teams by using video conference. Behav Inf Technol 2011; 30(4): 507–515.

47.

Lundvoll Nilsen

. Collaborative work by using videoconferencing: opportunities for learning in daily medical practice. Qual Health Res 2011; 21(8): 1147–1158.

48.

Sarangi

Healthcare interaction as an expert communication system: an activity analysis perspective. In: Streeck

(ed). New adventures in language and interaction, Mahwah, MJ: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010, pp. 167–198.

49.

Atkinson

. The discursive construction of competence and responsibility in medical collegial talk. Commun Med 2004; 1(1): 13–23.