Effect of home telehealth care on blood pressure control: A public healthcare centre model

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of home telehealth care combined with case management by public health nurses, in improving blood pressure control in patients with hypertension.

Methods

This cohort study examined the data of patients with hypertension obtained from a telehealth service centre database, between July 2011– June 2012. Eligible patients were adults (≥40 years old) with both prehypertension and hypertension, living alone or in the remote suburbs of metropolitan areas. Demographic data were collected from 12 district public health centre in Taipei, Taiwan. Following enrolment, patients received an appropriate and validated home telehealth device kit for automatic blood pressure monitoring and automated modem via a telephone line or a desktop computer with Internet connection to enable data transmission between the patient’s home and telehealth service centre. Patients were instructed to upload the measured data immediately every day. The study outcomes included blood pressure and home telehealth service utilisation.

Results

Of the 432 patients recruited, 408 (94%) completed data collection. Linear regression analysis found an average 22.1 mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure after one year. The mean slope of systolic blood pressure was classified as decreased or non-decreased. An systolic blood pressure decreasing trend was observed in 52.2% patients, while 47.8% patients showed an increasing systolic blood pressure trend. Patients in the decreased systolic blood pressure group tended to be older (p = 0. 0001), with a greater proportion of hypertension alarms (p = 0. 001), improved self-blood pressure monitoring behaviour (p = 0.009) and higher self-measured blood pressure monitoring frequency (p = 0. 010). Patients in the decreased systolic blood pressure group had a higher self-measured blood pressure monitoring frequency (odds ratio = 0.95, 95% confidence interval, 0.91–0.99, p = 0. 013) than their counterparts.

Conclusions

Home telehealth care combined with care management by public health nurses based in public health care centre was feasible and effective for improving blood pressure control among patients with hypertension. Further studies should conduct a thorough analysis of the cost-effectiveness of this intervention. A randomised controlled trial with a longer follow-up period is required to examine the effects of the improved home telehealth device kit on the care of patients with hypertension.

Keywords

Telehealth home telehealth care hypertension blood pressure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. A global brief on hypertension, http://www.who.int/cardiovascular_diseases/publications/global_brief_hypertension/en/ (2013, accessed 6 April 2016).

Health Promotion Administration. The prevalence of hypertension, http://www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/Web/HealthTopic/TopicArticle.aspx? (2011, accessed 29 September 2016).

Health Promotion Administration. The prevalence of hypertension, hyperglycemia, and high blood lipid profile, http://www.bhp.doh.gov.tw/BHPnet/Portal/Statistics.aspx (2008, accessed 29 September 2016).

McKinstry

Hanley

Wild

et al.

Telemonitoring based service redesign for the management of uncontrolled hypertension: Multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013; 346: f3030–f3030.

McKoy

Fitzner

Margetts

et al.

Are telehealth technologies for hypertension care and self-management effective or simply risky and costly?

Popul Health Manag 2015; 18: 192–202.

Bary

Jones

Banting

et al.

Performance and persistence of a blood pressure self-management intervention: Telemonitoring and self-management in hypertension (TASMINH2) trial. J Hum Hypertens 2015; 29: 436–441.

Bodenheimer

Lorig

Holman

et al.

Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 2002; 288: 2469–2475.

Park

Kim

. Cellular phone and Internet-based individual intervention on blood pressure and obesity in obese patients with hypertension. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78: 704–710.

Senesael

Borgermans

Van DeVijver

et al.

Effectiveness of a quality improvement intervention targeting cardiovascular risk factors: Are patients responsive to information and encouragement by mail or post?

Vasc Health Risk Manag 2013; 9: 13–20.

10.

Law

Wason

. Design of telehealth trials–introducing adaptive approaches. Int J Med Inform 2014; 83: 870–880.

11.

Agarwal

Bills

Hecht

et al.

Role of home blood pressure monitoring in overcoming therapeutic inertia and improving hypertension control: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension 2011; 57: 29–38.

12.

Santos

Oliveira

Novaes Mde

. A telehealth strategy for increasing adherence in the treatment of hypertension in primary care. Telemed J E Health 2013; 19: 241–247.

13.

Dellifraine

Dansky

. Home-based telehealth: A review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2008; 14: 62–66.

14.

Cimperman

Brencic

Trkman

et al.

Older adults’ perceptions of home telehealth services. Telemed J E Health 2013; 19: 786–790.

15.

Chi

Chen

. Advocacy of home telehealth care among consumers with chronic conditions. J Clin Nurs 2014; 23: 811–819.

16.

Young

Foster

Silander

et al.

Home telehealth: Patient satisfaction, program functions, and challenges for the care coordinator. J Gerontol Nurs 2011; 37: 38–46.

17.

Ministry of Health and Welfare (Taiwan). Telecare services, http://mohw.telecare.com.tw/WebPages/Sidebar1/ProjectArea.aspx (2013, accessed 29 September 2016).

18.

Yeh

. [Role and function of public health nurses in Taiwan: Review of current status and future perspectives]. Hu Li Za Zhi 2014; 61: 5–13.

19.

Chobanian

Bakris

Black

et al.

The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003; 289: 2560–2572.

20.

US Department of Health and Human Services. Principles of epidemiology in public health practice. 3rd ed. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, 2012.

21.

Logan

Irvine

Mclsaac

et al.

Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring with self-care support on uncontrolled systolic hypertension in diabetics. Hypertension 2012; 60: 51–57.

22.

Margolis

Asche

Bergdall

et al.

Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management on blood pressure control: A cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 46–56.

23.

Chen

Lin

Hung

et al.

Clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of a synchronous telehealth service for seniors and nonseniors with cardiovascular diseases: Quasi-experimental study. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e87–e87.

24.

Foster

Horspool

Edwards

et al.

Who does not participate in telehealth trials and why? A cross-sectional survey. Trials 2015; 16: 258–258.

25.

Chau

Lee

et al.

A feasibility study to investigate the acceptability and potential effectiveness of a telecare service for older people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81: 674–682.

26.

Stellefson

Chaney

Barry

et al.

Web 2.0 chronic disease self-management for older adults: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e35–e35.

27.

Chou

Chang

Lee

et al.

Technology acceptance and quality of life of the elderly in a telecare program. Comput Inform Nurs 2013; 31: 335–342.

28.

Uhlig

Patel

et al.

Self-measured blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159: 185–194.

29.

Baker

Macaulay

Sorg

et al.

Effects of care management and telehealth: A longitudinal analysis using Medicare data. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013; 61: 1560–1567.

30.

Chang

Lee

Mills

M.E

. Telecare for the elderly–community nurses’ experiences in Taiwan. Comput Inform Nurs 2013; 31: 29–35.

31.

Odeh

Kayyali

Nabhani et al.

Implementing a telehealth service: Nurses’ perceptions and experiences. Br J Nurs 2014; 23: 1133–1137.

32.

Wade

Cartwright

Shaw

. Carers’ perceptions of the impact of home telehealth monitoring on the provision of care and sustainability of use. Australas J Ageing 2015; 34: 109–114.