Using tele-emergency to avoid patient transfers in rural emergency departments: An assessment of costs and benefits

Abstract

Introduction

Tele-emergency can address several challenges facing emergency departments in rural areas. The purpose of this paper is to (a) examine the rates of avoided transfers in rural emergency departments that adopted tele-emergency applications; and (b) estimate the costs and benefits of using tele-emergency to avoid transfers.

Methods

Analysis is based on 9048 tele-emergency encounters generated by the Avera eEmergency programme (Sioux Falls, South Dakota) in 85 rural hospitals across seven states between October 2009–February 2014. For each non-transfer patient, physicians indicated whether the transfer was avoided because of tele-emergency activation. The cost-benefit analysis is conducted from the hospital, patient and societal perspectives, and includes technology costs, local hospital revenues and patient-associated savings. All monetary values are expressed in US$. Sensitivity analysis is conducted by examining the worst and best case scenarios of costs, revenues and savings.

Results

In these analyses, 1175 avoided transfers were attributed to tele-emergency. From a rural hospital perspective, tele-emergency costs around US$1739 to avoid a single transfer. However, tele-emergency saves around US$5563 in avoided transportation and indirect patient costs. Combining these, from a societal perspective, tele-emergency has the potential to result in a net savings of US$3823 per avoided transfer while accounting for tele-emergency technology costs, hospital revenues, and patient-associated savings.

Conclusion

This study highlights various stakeholder perspectives on the financial impact of tele-emergency in avoiding patient transfers in rural emergency departments. Telemedicine has the potential to reduce the number of transfers of emergency department patients and generate some revenue for rural hospitals despite associated technology costs, while incurring substantial patient savings.

Keywords

Telemedicine telehealth tele-emergency emergency department avoided transfers cost-effectiveness analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ginde

Sullivan

Camargo

. National study of the emergency physician workforce, 2008. Ann Emerg Med 2009; 54: 349–359.

Williams

Ehrlich

Prescott

. Emergency medical care in rural America. Ann Emerg Med 2001; 38: 323–327.

Ward

Jaana

Natafgi

. Systematic review of telemedicine applications in emergency rooms. Int J Med Inf 2015; 84: 601–616.

Mueller

Potter

MacKinney

et al.

Lessons from tele-emergency: Improving care quality and health outcomes by expanding support for rural care systems. Health Aff 2014; 33: 228–234.

Marcin

Dharmar

. Telemedicine taking on larger role in emergency departments. AAP News 2013; 34: 26–26.

Hicks

Boles

Hudson

et al.

Using telemedicine to avoid transfer of rural emergency department patients. J Rural Health 2001; 17: 220–228.

Ellis

Mayrose

Phelan

. Consultation times in emergency telemedicine using realtime videoconferencing. J Telemed Telecare 2006; 12: 303–305.

Olson J. Telemedicine versus emergency transfer of trauma patients: A systematic review. School of Physician Assistant Studies, Pacific University, Paper 488, 2014. Available at: http://commons.pacificu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1484&context=pa.

Whitten

Mair

Haycox

et al.

Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions. BMJ 2002; 324: 1434–1437.

10.

Mistry

. Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare. Changes in the economic evidence over twenty years. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18: 1–6.

11.

De la Torre-Díez

López-Coronado

Vaca

et al.

Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21: 81–85.

12.

Duchesne

Kyle

Simmons

et al.

Impact of telemedicine upon rural trauma care. J Trauma 2008; 64: 92–98.

13.

Latifi

Hadeed

Rhee

et al.

Initial experiences and outcomes of telepresence in the management of trauma and emergency surgical patients. Am J Surg 2009; 198: 905–910.

14.

Rogers

Ricci

Caputo

et al.

The use of telemedicine for realtime video consultation between trauma center and community hospital in a rural setting improves early trauma care: Preliminary results. J Trauma 2001; 51: 1037–1041.

15.

Scotte

Lehoux

Van Doesburg

et al.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of interactive paediatric telecardiology. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10: 78–83.

16.

Cusack CM, Pan E, Hook JM, et al. The value of provider-to-provider telehealth technologies. Charlestown: Center for Information Technology Leadership (CITL), 2007, Healthcare Information and Management System Society (HIMSS). Available at: http://www.partners.org/cird/pdfs/CITL_Telehealth_Report.pdf.

17.

Avera eCare. What we do: eEmergency, http://www.averaecare.org/ecare/what-we-do/eemergency/ (2016, accessed 20 June 2016).

18.

Ward

Ullrich

MacKinney

et al.

Tele-emergency utilization: In what clinical situations is tele-emergency activated?

J Telemed Telecare 2016; 22: 25–21.

19.

MacKinney

Ward

Ullrich

et al.

The business case for tele-emergency. Telemed J E Health 2015; 21: 1–7.

20.

Weinstein

Siegel

Gold

et al.

Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 1996; 276: 1253–1258.

21.

Jönsson

. Ten arguments for a societal perspective in the economic evaluation of medical innovations. Eur J of Health Econ 2009; 10: 357–359.

22.

Center for Clinical Standards and Quality/Survey & Certification Group, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Critical access hospital (CAH) emergency services and telemedicine: Implications for emergency services condition of participation (CoPs) and Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) on-call compliance, https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/SurveyCertificationGenInfo/Policy-and-Memos-to-States-and-Regions-Items/Survey-and-Cert-Letter-13-38.html (2013, accessed 30 March 2016).

23.

Shore

Brooks

Savin

et al.

An economic evaluation of telehealth data collection with rural populations. Psychiatr Serv 2007; 58: 830–835.

24.

Federal Office of Rural Health Policy. Evidence-base tele-emergency network grant program. US Department of Health & Human Services, Health Resources & Services Administration, http://www.hrsa.gov/ruralhealth/programopportunities/fundingopportunities/default.aspx?id=82c63d20-806f-4213-97a4-09de6dc4125d (2014, accessed 22 November 2016).

25.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Ambulance fee schedule public use files. CY 2012– South Dakota, https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AmbulanceFeeSchedule/afspuf.html (2015, accessed 29 March 2016).

26.

FederalPay.org South Dakota per diem rates for 2015, https://www.federalpay.org/perdiem/2015/southdakota (2015, accessed 29 March 2016).

27.

Barreto-Filho

Wang

Rathore

et al.

Transfer rates from nonprocedure hospitals after initial admission and outcomes among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 213–222.

28.

Weiss A and Elixhauser A. Overview of hospital stays in the United States, 2012. Healthcare Costs and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Statistical Brief #180, http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb180-Hospitalizations-United-States-2012.pdf (October 2014, accessed 15 April 2016).

29.

Agha

Schapira

Maker

. Cost effectiveness of telemedicine for the delivery of outpatient pulmonary care to a rural population. Telemed J E Health 2002; 8: 281–291.

30.

Potter A, Ward M, Natafgi N, et al. Perceptions of the benefits of telemedicine in rural communities. Perspective in Health Information Management, Summer 2016, pp.1–13. Available at: http://perspectives.ahima.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/PerceptionsofTelemedicine.pdf.