Despite the increased interest in telerehabilitation (TR), virtual reality (VR) and outcome measures for stroke rehabilitation, surprisingly little research has been done to map and identify the most common outcome measures used in TR. For this review, we conducted a systematic search of the literature that reports outcome measures used in TR or VR for stroke rehabilitation. Our specific objectives included: 1) to identify the outcome measures used in TR and VR studies; and 2) to describe which parts of the International Classification of Functioning are measured in the studies.
Methods
We conducted a comprehensive search of relevant electronic databases (e.g. PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, PSYCOINFO, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database). The scoping review included all study designs. Two reviewers conducted pilot testing of the data extraction forms and independently screened all the studies and extracted the data. Disagreements about inclusion or exclusion were resolved by consensus or by consulting a third reviewer.
Results
In total, 28 studies were included in this scoping review. The results were synthesized and reported considering the implications of the findings within the clinical practice and policy context.
Discussion
This scoping review identified a wide range of outcome measures used in VR and TR studies and helped identify gaps in current use of outcome measures in the literature. The review also informs researchers and end users (i.e. clinicians, policymakers and researchers) regarding the most appropriate outcome measures for TR or VR.
BrennanDMawsonSBrownsellSTelerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation and self management. In: GaggioliA (ed). Advanced technologies in rehabilitation, Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2009, pp. 231–248.
4.
WeissPKizonyRFeintuchUVirtual reality in neurorehabilitation. In: SelzerMCohenLGageF (eds). Textbook of neural repair and rehabilitation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 182–197.
SalterKFoleyNJutaiJ. Assessment of participation outcomes in randomized controlled trials of stroke rehabilitation interventions. Int J Rehabil Res2007; 30: 339–342.
JetteDHalbertJIversonC. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications. Phys Ther2009; 89: 125–135.
9.
ArkseyHO’MalleyL. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol2005; 8: 19–32.
10.
LevacDColquhounHO’BrienK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci2010; 5: 1–10.
11.
KastnerMTriccoACSoobiahC. What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? Protocol for a scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol2012; 12: 1–10.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ. The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med2009; 151: 264–269.
15.
DawsonSRMallenCDGouldstoneMB. The prevalence of anxiety and depression in people with age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review of observational study data. BMC Ophthalmol2014; 14: 78–78.
16.
CikajloIRudolfMGoljarN. Continuation of balance training for stroke subjects in home environment using virtual reality using virtual reality. Int J Disabil Hum Dev2011; 10: 317–320.
17.
CikajloI. Concept of the diagnostic tool for balance telerehabilitation of subjects with stroke. J Med Biol Eng2014; 34: 319–326.
18.
HoldenKMDyarTADayan-CimadoroL. Telerehabilitation using a virtual environment improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2007; 15: 36–42.
19.
GladstoneDDanellsCBlackS. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2002; 16: 232–240.
PironLTurollaAToninP. Satisfaction with care in post-stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home. J Telemed Telecare2008; 14: 257–260.
22.
MonninDPemegerT. Scale to measure patient satisfaction with physical therapy. Phys Ther2002; 82: 682–691.
23.
CrosbieJLennonMMcGoldrickM. Virtual reality in the rehabilitation of the arm after hemiplegic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil2012; 26: 798–806.
24.
TateRGodbeeKSigmundsdottirL. A systematic review of assessment tools for adults used in traumatic brain injury research and their relationship to the ICF. NeuroRehabilitation2013; 32: 729–750.
25.
ChoiJHHanEYKimBR. Effectiveness of commercial gaming-based virtual reality movement therapy on functional recovery of upper extremity in subacute stroke patients. Ann Rehabil Med2014; 38: 485–493.
26.
LindsayMGubitzGBayleyM. Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for stroke care (Update 2010). On behalf of the Canadian Stroke Strategy Best Practices and Standards Writing Group, Ottawa, ON: Canadian Stroke Network, 2010.
27.
LlorensRNoeEColomerC. Effectiveness, usability, and cost-benefit of a virtual reality-based telerehabilitation program for balance recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2015; 96: 418–425.
28.
BurdeaGCiociDMartinsJ. Motor retraining in virtual reality: a feasibility study for upper-extremity rehabilitation in individuals with chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Educ2011; 25(1): 20–29.
29.
CareyJRDurfeeWKBhattE. Comparison of finger tracking versus simple movement training via telerehabilitation to alter hand function and cortical reorganization after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2007; 21: 216–232.
30.
CikajloIRudolfMGoljarN. Telerehabilitation using virtual reality task can improve balance in patients with stroke. Disabil Rehabil2012; 34: 13–18.
31.
GaggioliAMeneghiniAMorgantiF. A strategy for computer-assisted mental practice in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2006; 20: 503–507.
32.
HermannVHHerzogMJordanR. Telerehabilitation and electrical simulation: an occupation-based, client-centered stroke intervention. Am J Occup Ther2010; 64: 73–81.
33.
KimJHJangSHKimCS. Use of virtual reality to enhance balance and ambulation in chronic stroke: a double-blind, randomized controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2009; 88: 693–701.
34.
KimHMillerLMFedulowI. Kinematic data analysis for post-stroke patients following bilateral versus unilateral rehabilitation with an upper limb wearable robotic system. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng2013; 21: 153–164.
35.
KingMHaleLPekkariA. An affordable, computerised, table-based exercise system for stroke Survivors. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol2010; 5: 288–293.
36.
KrpicASavanovicACikajloI. Telerehabilitation: remote multimedia-supported assistance and mobile monitoring of balance training outcomes can facilitate the clinical staff’s effort. Int J Rehabil Res2013; 36: 162–171.
37.
KuttuvaMBoianRMeriansA. The Rutgers Arm, a rehabilitation system in virtual reality: a pilot study. Cyberpsychol Behav2006; 9: 148–152.
38.
LeeSJChunMH. Combination transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality therapy for upper extremity training in patients with subacute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2014; 95: 431–438.
39.
LevinMFSnirOLiebermannDG. Virtual reality versus conventional treatment of reaching ability in chronic stroke: clinical feasibility study. Neurol Ther2012; 1: 1–15.
40.
LumPSUswatteGTaubE. A telerehabilitation approach to delivery of constraint-induced movement therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev2006; 43: 391–400.
41.
MoroneGTramontanoMIosaM. The efficacy of balance training with video game-based therapy in subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. BioMed Res Int2014; 2014: 1–5.
42.
Orihuela-EspinaFCastilloIFPalafoxL. Neural reorganization accompanying upper limb motor rehabilitation from stroke with virtual reality-based gesture therapy. Top Stroke Rehabil2013; 20: 197–209.
43.
ParetoLJohanssonBLjungbergC. Telehealth with 3D games for stroke rehabilitation. Int J Disabil Hum Dev2011; 10: 373–377.
44.
PironLTurollaAToninP. Satisfaction with care in post-stroke patients undergoing a telerehabilitation programme at home. J Telemed Telecare2008; 14: 257–260.
45.
PironLTurollaAAgostiniM. Exercises for paretic upper limb after stroke: a combined virtual reality and telemedicine approach. J Rehabil Med2009; 41: 1016–1020.
46.
Puthenveettil S, Fluet G, Qiu Q, et al. Classification of hand preshaping in persons with stroke using linear discriminant analysis. In: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012; 2012: 4563–6. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346982.
47.
Saleh S and Adamovich SV. Resting state functional connectivity and task-related effective connectivity changes after upper extremity rehabilitation: a pilot study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012; 2012: 4559–62. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346981.
48.
Sanchez RJ, Liu J, Rao SR, et al. Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2006; 14(3): 378–89.
49.
ShiriSFeintuchUHaddad-LoberA. A novel virtual reality system integrating online self-face viewing and mirror visual feedback for stroke rehabilitation: rationale and feasibility. Top Stroke Rehabil2012; 19: 277–286.
50.
SinghDKNordinNAMAzizNA. Effects of substituting a portion of standard physiotherapy time with virtual reality games among community-dwelling stroke survivors. BMC Neurol2013; 13: 199–212.
