The use of telehealth services to facilitate audiological management for children: A scoping review and content analysis

Abstract

Approximately 32 million children globally present with disabling hearing loss. Despite evidence describing the negative consequences of hearing loss, there is still a lack of hearing screening programmes in South Africa. Audiologists have been exploring the use of information and communication technologies (tele-audiology) to provide services to children and it is currently being evaluated to determine its feasibility.

Aims

We aim to describe tele-audiology services conducted to facilitate audiological management for children in both the rural and urban context and to determine the strengths, challenges and clinical implications of such services.

Methods

A scoping review was conducted by searching for peer-reviewed publications from five databases. Inclusion criteria and search strategies were outlined.

Results

Of the 23 studies that met the inclusion criteria, reliability of automated testing was comparable to conventional testing; however, these studies were based primarily on screening programmes. Eight (35%) of the 23 papers were concordance studies evaluating feasibility and validity of tele-audiology systems when compared with conventional testing, while one study (4%) evaluated a tele-audiology service. A further four studies (17%) evaluated the feasibility of introducing telehealth methods to evaluate middle ear pathology. Tele-auditory brainstem response was investigated in three studies (13%) and another five (22%) used smartphone and/or iPad technology to screen hearing. Only two studies (9%) evaluated the feasibility of providing intervention through telehealth methods. All included studies demonstrated improved access to and coverage of rural areas. Services such as video otoscopy and synchronous (online) hearing testing in remote areas were successfully implemented. Challenges included lack of diagnostic studies, inadequate training of staff and the need to standardize protocols and procedures in order to ensure that tele-audiology services are provided in a standardized and valid manner.

Conclusion

Tele-audiology services are feasible and can be useful in identifying auditory pathology for children in rural and remote areas.

Keywords

Synchronous asynchronous tele-audiology telehealth

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

World Health Organization. World Health Organization Recommendations of the WHO Expert Committee on Comprehensive School Health Education and Promotion. Geneva, http://www.who.int/school_youth_health/media/en/84.pdf (accessed 16 March 2016).

Stevens

Flaxman

Brunskill

. (on behalf of the Global Burden of Disease Hearing Loss Expert Group). Global and regional hearing impairment prevalence: an analysis of 42 studies in 29 countries. Eur J Public Health 2011; 23: 146–152.

Swanepoel

Myburgh

Howe

. Smartphone hearing screening with integrated quality control and data management. Int J Audiol 2014; 53: 841–849.

Swanepoel D. Chapter One: The Global Epidemic of Infant Hearing Loss – Priorities for Prevention, http://www.phonakpro.com/content/dam/phonak/Pho_Chap_01_Swanepoel_final.pdf (accessed 16 March 2016).

Khoza-Shangase

Barratt

Jonosky

. Protocols for early audiology intervention services: Views from early intervention practitioners in a developing country. S Afr J Child Health 2010; 4: 100–105.

Goulios

Patuzzi

. Audiology education and practice from an international perspective. Int J Audiol 2008; 47: 647–664.

Wonkam

. Childhood hearing loss in Cameroon (Sub-Saharan Africa). Eur J Med Genet 2013; 56: 20–25.

Bamford

Fortnum

Bristow

. Current practice, accuracy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the school entry hearing screen. Health Technol Assess 2007; 11: 1–168.

Swanepoel DW. Chapter One: The Global Epidemic of Infant Hearing Loss – Priorities for Prevention, 2010, http://www.phonakpro.com/content/dam/phonak/Chap_01_Swanepoel_final.pdf (accessed February 2016).

10.

Swanepoel

Olusanya

Mars

. Hearing health-care delivery in sub-Saharan Africa - a role for tele-audiology. J Telemed Telecare 2010; 16: 53–56.

11.

Givens

Elangovan

. Internet application to tele-audiology- “Nothin but Net”. Am J Audiol 2003; 12: 59–65.

12.

Givens

Blanarovich

Murphy

. Internet-based tele-audiometry System for the Assessment of Hearing: A pilot Study. Telemed J e-Health 2004; 9: 375–378.

13.

Swanepoel

Koekemoer

Clark

. Intercontinental hearing assessment: A study in tele-audiology. J Telemed Telecare 2010; 16: 248–252.

14.

Houston

Stredler-Brown

. Model of early intervention for children with hearing loss provided through telepractice. Volta Rev 2012; 112: 3: 283–296.

15.

Swanepoel

Hall

. A systematic review of telehealth applications in audiology. J Telemed e-Health 2010; 16: 181–200.

16.

Mahomed

Swanepoel

Eikelboom

. Validity of automated threshold audiometry: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ear Hearing 2013; 34: 745–752.

17.

Cohn

Cason

. Telepractice: A wide-angle view for persons with hearing loss. Volta Rev 2012; 112: 207–226.

18.

Edwards

Stredler-Brown

Houston

. Expanding use of telepractice in speech-language pathology and audiology. A systematic review of narrative-based language intervention with children. Volta Rev 2012; 3: 227–242.

19.

Creswell

. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five approaches, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2007.

20.

Whiting

Weswood

Rutjes

. Evaluation of QUADAS, a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 6: 9–9.

21.

Krumm

Huffman

Dick

. Telemedicine for audiology screening of infants. J Telemed Telecare 2008; 14: 102–104.

22.

Hayes

. Infant diagnostic evaluations using tele-audiology. Hearing Rev 2012; 19: 30–31.

23.

Ramkumar

Hall

Nagarajan

. Tele-ABR using a satellite connection in a mobile van for newborn hearing testing. J Telemed Telecare 2013; 19: 233–237.

24.

Ramkumar

Nagarajan

Kumaravelu

. Providing Tele ABR in Rural India. SIG 18 Perspect Teleprac 2014; 4: 30–36.

25.

Aronzon

Ross

Kazahaya

. Diagnosis of middle ear disease using tympanograms and digital imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 131: 917–920.

26.

Eikelboom

Mbao

Coates

. Validation of teleotology to diagnose ear disease in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhin 2005; 69: 739–744.

27.

Lundberg

Biagio

Laurent

. Remote evaluation of video-otoscopy recordings in an unselected pediatric population with an otitis media scale. Int J Pediatr Otorhin 2014; 78: 1489–1495.

28.

Biagio

Swanepoel de

Laurent

. Video-otoscopy recordings for diagnosis of childhood ear disease using telehealth at primary health care level. J Telemed Telecare 2014; 20: 300–306.

29.

Smith

Armfield

. A mobile telemedicine-enabled ear screening service for Indigenous children in Queensland: Activity and outcomes in the first three years. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18: 485–489.

30.

Lancaster

Krumm

Ribera

. Remote hearing screenings via telehealth in a rural elementary school. Am J Audiol 2008; 17: 114–122.

31.

McPherson

Law

Wong

. Hearing screening for school children: comparison of low-cost, computer-based and conventional audiometry. Child Care Health Dev 2010; 36: 323–331.

32.

Ciccia

Whitford

Krumm

. Improving young urban children's access to speech, language, and hearing screenings via telehealth. J Telemed Telecare 2011; 17: 217–221.

33.

Kam

Gao

. Automated hearing screening for children: A pilot study in China. Int J Audiol 2013; 52: 855–860.

34.

Kam

Yeung

. Automated hearing screening for preschool children. J Med Screen 2014; 21: 717–715–717–715.

35.

Botasso

Sanches

SGG

Bento

. Teleaudiometry as a screening method in school children. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2015; 70: 283–288.

36.

Maclennan-Smith

Swanepoel

Hall

JW III

. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment. Int J Audiol 2013; 52: 66–73.

37.

Rourke

Bromwich

Chan

. iPad audiometry in Canada’s North: A portable and cost-effective method for hearing screening. Otolaryn Head Neck Surg 2014; 151(1 suppl): 104–104.

38.

Khoza-Shangase

Kassner

. Automated screening audiometry in the digital age: Exploring uhear™ and its use in a resource-stricken developing country. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2013; 29: 42–47.

39.

Wenjin

Jingrong

Yun

. A new hearing screening system for preschool children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinol 2014; 78: 290–295.

40.

Chan

. iHEAR: Using iPad technology to screen for hearing loss in children. J Scrub-in 2015; 10: 14–15.

41.

Constantinescu

. Satisfaction with telemedicine for teaching listening and spoken language to children with hearing loss. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18: 267–272.

42.

Hughes

Goehring

Baudhuin

. The use of telehealth for research and clinical measures in cochlear implant recipients: A validation study. J Speech Lang Hearing Res 2012; 55: 1112–1127.

43.

Meyer

Swanepoel

. Newborn hearing screening in the private health care sector - a national survey. S Afr Med J 2011; 101: 665–667.

44.

Olusanya

Luxon

Wirz

. Benefits and challenges of newborn hearing screening of developing countries. Int J of Pediatr Otorhin 2004; 68: 287–305.

45.

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Guidelines for audiologic screening, www.asha.org/policy (accessed February 2016).

46.

Department of Health and Department of Basic Education Integrated School Health Policy. 2012. http://www.education.gov.za (accessed February 2016).

47.

American Academy of Audiology Childhood Hearing Screening Guidelines. 2011. www.audiology.org (accessed February 2016).

48.

Francis

Koch

Wyatt

AJE

. Trends in educational placement and cost-benefit considerations in children with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125: 499–505.

49.

Tucci

Merson

Wilson

. A summary of the literature on global impairment: Current status and priorities for action. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 31–41.

50.

Gelfand

. Essentials of Audiology, 3nd Ed edn. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. New York, 2009.

51.

Martin M (ed). Speech audiometry. 2nd ed. London, England: Whurr Publishers Ltd, 1997.