Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT) has been shown to be efficacious for chronic tic disorders (CTDs), but utilization is limited by a lack of treatment providers and perceived financial and time burden of commuting to treatment. A promising alternative to in-person delivery is voice over Internet protocol (VoIP), allowing for remote, real-time treatment delivery to patients’ homes. However, little is known about the effectiveness of VoIP for CTDs. Therefore, the present study examined the preliminary efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of VoIP-delivered CBIT (CBIT-VoIP).
Methods
Twenty youth (8–16 years) with CTDs participated in a randomized, waitlist-controlled pilot trial of CBIT-VoIP. The main outcome was pre- to post-treatment change in clinician-rated tic severity (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale). The secondary outcome was clinical responder rate (Clinical Global Impressions – Improvement Scale), assessed using ratings of ‘very much improved’ or ‘much improved’ indicating positive treatment response.
Results
Intention-to-treat analyses with the last observation carried forward were performed. At post-treatment (10-weeks), significantly greater reductions in clinician-rated, (F(1,18) = 3.05, p < 0.05, partial η2 = 0.15), and parent-reported tic severity, (F(1,18) = 6.37, p < 0.05, partial η2 = 0.26) were found in CBIT-VoIP relative to waitlist. One-third (n = 4) of those in CBIT-VoIP were considered treatment responders. Treatment satisfaction and therapeutic alliance were high.
Discussion
CBIT can be delivered via VoIP with high patient satisfaction, using accessible, low-cost equipment. CBIT-VoIP was generally feasible to implement, with some audio and visual challenges. Modifications to enhance treatment delivery are suggested.
CavannaAEDavidKBanderaV. Health-related quality of life in Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome: A decade of research. Behav Neurol2013; 27: 83–93.
2.
ConeleaCAWoodsDWZinnerSH. Exploring the impact of chronic tic disorders on youth: Results from the Tourette syndrome impact survey. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev2011; 42: 219–242.
3.
ScahillLErenbergGBerlinCMJr. Contemporary assessment and pharmacotherapy of Tourette syndrome. NeuroRx2006; 3: 192–206.
4.
HimleMBWoodsDWPiacentiniJ. A brief review of habit reversal training for Tourette syndrome. J Child Neurol2006; 21: 719–725.
5.
WoodsDWPiacentiniJChangSW. Managing Tourette syndrome: A behavioral intervention for children and adults, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
6.
PiacentiniJWoodsDWScahillL. Behavior therapy for children with Tourette disorder: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA2010; 303: 1929–1937.
7.
WilhelmSPetersonALPiacentiniJ. Randomized trial of behavior therapy for adults with Tourette Syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry2012; 69: 795–803.
8.
MurphyTKLewinABStorchEA. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with tic disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry2013; 52: 1341–1359.
9.
SteevesTMcKinlayBDGormanD. Canadian guidelines for the evidence-based treatment of tic disorders: Behavioural therapy, deep brain stimulation, and transcranial magnetic stimulation. Can J Psychiatry2012; 57: 144–151.
10.
VerdellenCVan De GriendtJHartmannA. European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders. Part III: Behavioural and psychosocial interventions. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry2011; 20: 197–207.
11.
WoodsDWConeleaCAHimleMB. Behavior therapy for Tourette’s disorder: Utilization in a community sample and an emerging area of practice for psychologists. Prof Psychol Res Pr2010; 41: 518–525.
12.
HiltyDMLuoJSMoracheC. Telepsychiatry: An overview for psychiatrists. CNS Drugs2006; 16: 527–548.
13.
HimleMBFreitagMWaltherM. A randomized pilot trial comparing videoconference versus face-to-face delivery of behavior therapy for childhood tic disorders. Behav Res Ther2012; 50: 565–570.
14.
MartinSSutcliffePGriffithsF. Effectiveness and impact of networked communication interventions in young people with mental health conditions: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns2011; 85: e108–e119.
15.
TantamD. Computers, the internet and the World Wide Web: An introduction for the e-therapist. Adv Psychiatr Treat2006; 12: 359–367.
16.
ChoiNGHegelMTMartiCM. Telehealth problem-solving therapy for depressed low-income homebound older adults: Acceptance and preliminary efficacy. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry2014; 22: 263–271.
17.
KingVLBroonerRKPeirceJM. A randomized trial of web-based videoconferencing for substance abuse counseling. J Subst Abuse Treat2014; 46: 36–42.
18.
LichsteinKLScoginFThomasJ. Telehealth cognitive behavior therapy for co-occurring insomnia and depression symptoms in older adults. J Clin Psychol2013; 69: 1056–1065.
19.
StorchEACaporinoNEMorganJR. Preliminary investigation of web-camera delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res2011; 189: 407–412.
20.
YuenEKHerbertJDFormanEM. Acceptance based behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder through videoconferencing. Journal Anxiety Disord2013; 27: 389–397.
21.
ChoiNGWilsonNLSirrianniL. Acceptance of home-based telehealth problem-solving therapy for depressed, low-income homebound older adults: Qualitative interviews with the participants and aging-service case managers. Gerontologist2014; 54: 704–713.
22.
GoetterEMHerbertJDFormanEM. Delivering exposure and ritual prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder via videoconference: Clinical considerations and recommendations. J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord2013; 2: 137–143.
23.
KhatriNMarzaliETchernikovI. Comparing telehealth-based and clinic-based group cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with depression and anxiety: A pilot study. Clin Interv Aging2014; 9: 765–770.
24.
ArmfieldNRGrayLCSmithAC. Clinical use of Skype: A review of the evidence base. J Telemed Telecare2012; 18: 125–127.
SheehanDVSheehanKHShytleRD. Reliability and validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview for Children and Adolescents (MINI-Kid). J Clin Psychiatry2010; 71: 313–326.
27.
WechslerD. Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI), London: The Psychological Corporation, 1999.
28.
CanivezGLKonoldTRCollinsJM. Construct validity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence and Wide Range Intellligence Test: Convergent and structural validity. Sch Psychol Q2009; 24: 252–265.
29.
AxelrodBN. Validity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence and other very short forms of estimating intellectual functioning. Assessment2002; 9: 17–23.
30.
SaklofskeDHCaravanGSchwartzC. Concurrent validity of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) with a sample of Canadian children. Can J Psychol2000; 16: 87–94.
31.
LeckmanJFRiddleMAHardinMT. The Yale Global Tic Severity Scale: Initial testing of a clinician-rated scale of tic severity. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry1989; 28: 566–573.
32.
StorchEAMurphyTKGeffkenGR. Reliability and validity of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale. Psychol Assess2005; 17: 486–491.
33.
Ricketts EJ, Bauer CC, Ran D, et al. Pilot open case series of Voice over Internet Protocol-delivered behavior therapy for tic disorders. Cogn Behav Pract. Epub ahead of print 16 October 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.09.003.
34.
GuyW. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rev. DHEW publication no. (ADM) 76-338, Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, 1976.
35.
ScahillLChappellPBKimYS. A placebo-controlled trial of guanfacine in the treatment of children with tic disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry2001; 158: 1067–1074.
36.
ChangSHimleMBTuckerBTP. Initial psychometric properties of a brief parent-report instrument for assessing tic severity in children with chronic tic disorder. Child Fam Behav Ther2009; 31: 181–191.
37.
KendallPCFlannery-SchroederEPanichelli-MindelSM. Therapy for youths with anxiety disorders: A second randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol1997; 65: 366–380.
38.
ElvinsRGreenJ. The conceptualization and measurement of therapeutic alliance: An empirical review. Clin Psychol Rev2008; 28: 1167–1187.
39.
LarsenDLAttkissonCHargreavesWA. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Eval Program Plann1997; 2: 197–207.
40.
RobertsREAttkissonCC. Assessing client satisfaction among Hispanics. Eval Program Plann1983; 6: 401–413.
41.
NguyenTDAttkissonCCStegnerBL. Assessment of patient satisfaction: Development and refinement of a Service Evaluation Questionnaire. Eval Program Plann1983; 6: 299–314.
42.
HunsleyJ. Development of the Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire. J Psychopathol Behav Assess1992; 14: 55–64.
43.
YipMPChangAMChanJ. Development of the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire to evaluate patient satisfaction with telemedicine: A preliminary study. J Telemed Telecare2003; 9: 46–50.
44.
Saghaei M. Random Allocation Software. Version 1.0. Isfahan, Iran; M. Saghei, 2004.
45.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. text revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
46.
SchulzKFAltmanDGMoherD. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Br Med J2010; 340: 698–702.
47.
Qualtrics Labs, Inc. Qualtrics Research Suite. Version 21269. Provo, UT: Qualtrics Labs, Inc., 2011.
48.
Evaer Technology. Evaer video recorder for Skype. Version 1.3.9.29. www.evaer.com (2013, accessed 10 January 2013).
49.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
50.
Yuen EK. Acceptance-based behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder using videoconferencing. PhD Thesis, Drexel University Philadelphia, 2010.
