We conducted a systematic literature review to investigate the domain of speech-language and hearing sciences (SLHS) in telehealth.
Methods
The databases used for the literature search were Web of Knowledge, Pubmed, Scopus, Embase and Scielo. The inclusion criteria consisted of papers published up to August 2014. Papers without peer-review evaluation, and those without abstracts or available full texts were excluded.
Results
A total of 103 papers were selected. The selected studies have focused primarily on hearing (32.1%), followed by speech (19.4%), language (16.5%), voice (8.7%), swallowing (5.8%), multiple areas (13.6%) and others (3.9%). The majority of the studies focused on assessment (36.9%) or intervention (36.9%). The use of telehealth in SLHS has been increasing in many countries, especially in the last 5 years. The country with the largest number of published studies was the United States of America (32.03%), followed by Australia (29.12%). The remaining studies were distributed in lower numbers among other countries.
Discussion
The advancement of information and communication technologies provides more favourable conditions for providing distance care in several areas. Most of studies concluded that the telehealth procedure had advantages over the non-telehealth alternative approach (85.5%); however, 13.6% reported that it was unclear whether the telehealth procedure had advantages. Some barriers still need to be overcome, such as technology, training, regulation, acceptance and recognition of the benefits of this practice by the public and professionals. The need for speech-language pathologists and audiologists to adapt to this new health care modality is evident.
EdwardsMStredler-BrownAHoustonKT. Expanding use of telepractice in speech-language pathology and audiology. Volta Review2012; 112: 227–242.
2.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Audiologists Providing Clinical Services via Telepractice: Position statement, www.asha.org/policy (2005, accessed 2 July 2014).
FabryD. Applications of telehealth for hearing care. Audiol Today2010; 22: 18–25.
5.
ReynoldsALVickJLHaakNJ. Telehealth applications in speech-language pathology: A modified narrative review. J Telemed Telecare2009; 15: 310–316.
6.
KeckCSDoamCR. Telehealth tecnology applications in speech-language pathology. TelemedJ E Health2014; 20: 653–659.
7.
Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011, www.cochrane-handbook.org (2015, accessed 12 May 2015).
8.
BongárS. A novel computer-aided neurolinguistic approach to the treatment of aphasia. Periodica Polytechina Eletrical Engineering2006; 50: 115–128.
9.
XueSALowerA. Acoustic fidelity of internet bandwidths for measures used in speech and voice disorders. J Acoust Soc Am2010; 128: 1366–1376.
10.
PackmanAOnslowM. Investigating optimal intervention intensity with the Lidcombe Program of early stuttering intervention. Int J Speech Lang Pathol2012; 14: 467–470.
11.
Corrêa CdCFerrariDVBerretin-FelixG. Quality, range, and legibility in web sites related to orofacial functions. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol2013; 17: 358–362.
12.
EikelboomRHAtlasMD. Attitude to telemedicine, and willingness to use it, in audiology patients. J Telemed Telecare2005; 11: 22–25.
13.
SwanepoelDMngemaneSMolemongS. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry. Telemed J E Health2010; 16: 557–563.
14.
GivensGDElangovanS. Internet application to tele-audiology “nothin' but net”. Am J Audiol2003; 12: 59–65.
15.
ChoiJMLeeHBParkCS. PC-based tele-audiometry. Telemed J E Health2007; 13: 501–508.
16.
GivensGDBlanarovichAMurphyT. Internet-based tele-audiometry system for the assessment of hearing: A pilot study. Telemed J E Health2003; 9: 375–378.
17.
SwanepoelDWKoekemoerDClarkJ. Intercontinental hearing assessment – a study in tele-audiology. J Telemed Telecare2010; 16: 248–252.
18.
MasalskiMKrecickiT. Self-test web-based pure-tone audiometry: Validity and measurement error analysis. J Med Internet Res2013; 15: 10–10.
19.
YaoJCWanYBGivensGD. Using web services to realize remote hearing assessment. J Clin Monit Comput2010; 24: 41–50.
ElliottGSmithACBensinkME. The feasibility of a community-based mobile telehealth screening service for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in Australia. Telemed J E Health2010; 16: 250–256.
23.
LancasterPKrummMRiberaJ. Remote hearing screenings via telehealth in a rural elementary school. Am J Audiol2008; 17: 114–122.
24.
SmithACArmfieldNRWuWI. A mobile telemedicine-enabled ear screening service for Indigenous children in Queensland: Activity and outcomes in the first three years. J Telemed Telecare2012; 18: 485–489.
25.
RamkumarVHallJWNagarajanR. Tele-ABR using a satellite connection in a mobile van for newborn hearing testing. J Telemed Telecare2013; 19: 233–237.
26.
DelbWMerkelDPilorgetK. Effectiveness of a TEOAE-based screening program. Can a patient-tracking system effectively be organized using modern information technology and central data management?Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol2004; 261: 191–196.
27.
MolanderPNordqvistPObergM. Internet-based hearing screening using speech-in-noise: Validation and comparisons of self-reported hearing problems, quality of life and phonological representation. BMJ Open2013; 3: 9–9.
28.
RiberaJE. Interjudge reliability and validation of telehealth applications of the hearing in noise test. Semin Hearing2005; 26: 13–18.
29.
YaoJCGivensGDWanYB. A web services-based distributed system with browser-client architecture to promote tele-audiology assessment. Telemed J E Health2009; 15: 777–782.
30.
SinghGPichora-FullerMKMalkowskiM. A survey of the attitudes of practitioners toward teleaudiology. Int J Audiol2014; 53: 850–860.
31.
HughesMLGoehringJLBaudhuinJL. Use of telehealth for research and clinical measures in cochlear implant recipients: A validation study. J Speech Lang Hear Res2012; 55: 1112–1127.
McElveenJTBlackburnELGreenJD. Remote programming of cochlear implants: A telecommunications model. Otol Neurotol2010; 31: 1035–1040.
35.
GoehringJLHughesMLBaudhuinJL. The effect of technology and testing environment on speech perception using telehealth with cochlear implant recipients. J Speech Lang Hear Res2012; 55: 1373–1386.
36.
RamosARodriguezCMartinez-BeneytoP. Use of telemedicine in the remote programming of cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol2009; 129: 533–540.
37.
KuzovkovVYanovYLevinS. Remote programming of MED-EL cochlear implants: Users' and professionals' evaluation of the remote programming experience. Acta Otolaryngol2014; 134: 709–716.
38.
EikelboomRHJayakodyDMPSwanepoelDW. Validation of remote mapping of cochlear implants. J Telemed Telecare2014; 20: 171–177.
39.
PenteadoSPRamos SdLBattistellaLR. Adaptação à distância de próteses auditivas acústicas: a teleaudiologia aplicada na melhoria da condução das Políticas Públicas no Brasil. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol2012; 16: 371–381.
40.
CamposPDFerrariDV. Teleaudiology: Evaluation of teleconsultation efficacy for hearing aid fitting. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol2012; 24: 301–308.
41.
LundbergMAnderssonGLunnerT. A randomized, controlled trial of the short-term effects of complementing an educational program for hearing aid users with telephone consultations. J Am Acad Audiol2011; 22: 654–662.
42.
Laplante-LevesqueAPichora-FullerMKGagneJP. Providing an internet-based audiological counselling programme to new hearing aid users: A qualitative study. Int J Audiol2006; 45: 697–706.
43.
BastosBGFerrariDV. Portal dos bebês? seção aparelho auditivo: avaliação por pais de crianças deficientes auditivas. Revista CEFAC2014; 16: 72–82.
44.
HenryJAZauggTLMyersPJ. Pilot study to develop telehealth tinnitus management for persons with and without traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Res Dev2012; 49: 1025–1042.
45.
HillAJTheodorosDRussellT. Using telerehabilitation to assess apraxia of speech in adults. Int J Lang Commun Disord2009; 44: 731–747.
46.
BrennanDMGeorgeadisACBaronCR. The effect of videoconference-based telerehabilitation on story retelling performance by brain-injured subjects and its implications for remote speech-language therapy. Telemed J E Health2004; 10: 147–154.
47.
AgostiniMGarzonMBenavides-VarelaS. Telerehabilitation in poststroke anomia. Biomed Res Int2014; 2014: 706909–706909.
48.
VismaraLAMcCormickCYoungGS. Preliminary findings of a telehealth approach to parent training in autism. J Autism Dev Disord2013; 43: 2953–2969.
49.
WaiteMCTheodorosDGRussellTG. Assessment of children's literacy via an internet-based telehealth system. Telemed J E Health2010; 16: 564–575.
50.
McCulloughA. Viability and effectiveness of teletherapy for pre-school children with special needs. Int J Lang Commun Disord2001; 36: 321–326.
VestalLSmith-OlindeLHicksG. Efficacy of language assessment in Alzheimer's disease: Comparing in-person examination and telemedicine. Clin Intervent Aging2006; 1: 467–471.
53.
BeveridgeMA. Implementation of a multimedia presentation system for computer-based aphasia therapy. Int J Healthcare Technol Manage2006; 7: 364–386.
54.
PalsboSE. Equivalence of functional communication assessment in speech pathology using videoconferencing. J Telemed Telecare2007; 13: 40–43.
55.
BaharavEReiserC. Using telepractice in parent training in early autism. Telemed J E Health2010; 16: 727–731.
56.
TurkstraLSQuinn-PadronMJohnsonJE. In-person versus telehealth assessment of discourse ability in adults with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil2012; 27: 424–432.
57.
VismaraLAYoungGSRogersSJ. Telehealth for expanding the reach of early autism training to parents. Autism Res Treat2012; 2012: 121878–121878.
58.
HaileyDRoineROhinmaaA. The status of telerehabilitation in neurological applications. J Telemed Telecare2013; 19: 307–310.
59.
PearlPLSableCEvansS. International telemedicine consultations for neurodevelopmental disabilities. Telemed E Health2014; 20: 559–562.
60.
ConstantinescuGWaiteMDornanD. A pilot study of telepractice delivery for teaching listening and spoken language to children with hearing loss. J Telemed Telecare2014; 20: 135–140.
61.
KullyD. Telehealth in speech pathology: Applications to the treatment of stuttering. J Telemed Telecare2000; 6: 39–41.
62.
O'BrianSPackmanAOnslowM. Telehealth delivery of the Camperdown Program for adults who stutter: A phase I trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res2008; 51: 184–195.
63.
CareyBO'BrianSOnslowM. Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of a telehealth treatment for chronic stuttering: The Camperdown Program. Int J Lang Commun Disord2010; 45: 108–120.
64.
ZieglerWZierdtA. Telediagnostic assessment of intelligibility in dysarthria: A pilot investigation of MVP-online. J Commun Disord2008; 41: 553–577.
65.
HillAJTheodorosDGRussellTG. The redesign and re-evaluation of an internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of dysarthria in adults. Telemed J E Health2009; 15: 840–850.
66.
WhiteheadEDorfmanVTremperG. Telemedicine as a means of effective speech evaluation for patients with cleft palate. Ann Plast Surg2012; 68: 415–417.
67.
SicotteCLehouxPFortier-BlancJ. Feasibility and outcome evaluation of a telemedicine application in speech-language pathology. J Telemed Telecare2003; 9: 253–258.
68.
TheodorosDRussellTGHillA. Assessment of motor speech disorders online: A pilot study. J Telemed Telecare2003; 9: S66–S68.
69.
WilsonLOnslowMLincolnM. Telehealth adaptation of the Lidcombe program of early stuttering intervention: Five case studies. Am J Speech Lang Pathol2004; 13: 81–93.
70.
HillAJTheodorosDGRussellTG. An internet-based telerehabilitation system for the assessment of motor speech disorders: A pilot study. Am J Speech Lang Pathol2006; 15: 45–56.
71.
WaiteMCCahillLMTheodorosDG. A pilot study of online assessment of childhood speech disorders. J Telemed Telecare2006; 12: 92–94.
72.
LewisCPackmanAOnslowM. A phase II trial of telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe program of early stuttering intervention. Am J Speech Lang Pathol2008; 17: 139–149.
73.
KoushikSShenkerROnslowM. Follow-up of 6-10-year-old stuttering children after Lidcombe Program treatment: A Phase I trial. J Fluency Disord2009; 34: 279–290.
74.
Grogan-JohnsonSAlvaresRRowanL. A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of speech language therapy provided by telemedicine with conventional on-site therapy. J Telemed Telecare2010; 16: 134–139.
75.
BeijerLJRietveldTCMvan BeersMMA. E-learning-based speech therapy: A web application for speech training. Telemed J E Health2010; 16: 178–181.
76.
BeijerLJRietveldTCMHoskamV. Evaluating the feasibility and the potential efficacy of e-Learning-Based Speech Therapy (EST) as a web application for speech training in dysarthric patients with Parkinson's disease: A case study. Telemed J E Health2010; 16: 732–738.
77.
ConstantinescuGATheodorosDGRussellTG. Home-based speech treatment for Parkinson's disease delivered remotely: A case report. J Telemed Telecare2010; 16: 100–104.
78.
Grogan-JohnsonSSchmidtAMSchenkerJ. A comparison of speech sound intervention delivered by telepractice and side-by-side service delivery models. Commun Disord Q2013; 34: 210–220.
79.
Martín-RuizMLDuboyMAVde la CruzIP. Deployment and validation of a smart system for screening of language disorders in primary care. Sensors2013; 13: 7522–7545.
80.
MashimaPABirkmire-PetersDPSymsMJ. Telehealth: Voice therapy using telecommunications technology. Am J Speech Lang Pathol2003; 12: 432–439.
81.
WormaldRNMoranRJReillyRB. Performance of an automated, remote system to detect vocal fold paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol2008; 117: 834–838.
82.
TindallLRHuebnerRAStempleJC. Videophone-delivered voice therapy: A comparative analysis of outcomes to traditional delivery for adults with Parkinson's disease. Telemed J E Health2008; 14: 1070–1077.
83.
Sáenz-LechónNOsma-RuizVGodino-LlorenteJI. Effects of audio compression in automatic detection of voice pathologies. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2008; 55: 2831–2835.
84.
ZhuYMWittREMacCallumJK. Effects of the Voice over Internet Protocol on perturbation analysis of normal and pathological phonation. Folia Phoniatr Logop2010; 62: 288–296.
85.
LittleMAMcSharryPEHunterEJ. Suitability of dysphonia measurements for telemonitoring of Parkinson's disease. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2009; 56: 1015–1022.
86.
TsanasALittleMAMcSharryPE. Accurate telemonitoring of Parkinsons disease progression by noninvasive speech tests. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2010; 57: 884–893.
87.
TsanasALittleMAMcSharryPE. Nonlinear speech analysis algorithms mapped to a standard metric achieve clinically useful quantification of average Parkinson's disease symptom severity. J R Soc Interface2011; 8: 842–855.
88.
SharmaSWardECBurnsC. Assessing swallowing disorders online: A pilot telerehabilitation study. Telemed E Health2011; 17: 688–695.
89.
MalandrakiGAMcCulloughGHeXM. Teledynamic evaluation of oropharyngeal swallowing. J Speech Lang Hear Res2011; 54: 1497–1505.
90.
WardECSharmaSBurnsC. Managing patient factors in the assessment of swallowing via telerehabilitation. Int J Telemed Appl2012; 2012: 132719–132719.
91.
WardECSharmaSBurnsC. Validity of conducting clinical dysphagia assessments for patients with normal to mild cognitive impairment via telerehabilitation. Dysphagia2012; 27: 460–472.
92.
WardECBurnsCLTheodorosDG. Impact of dysphagia severity on clinical decision making via telerehabilitation. Telemed E Health2014; 20: 296–303.
93.
MalandrakiGAMarkakiVGeorgopoulosVC. An international pilot study of asynchronous teleconsultation for oropharyngeal dysphagia. J Telemed Telecare2013; 19: 75–79.
94.
GiorginoTTormenePCattaniB. Remote support for stroke rehabilitation: MyHeart's “Neurological Rehabilitation” Concept. Medinfo 2007: Proceedings of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics, Pts 1 and 22007; 129: 92–96.
95.
ParmantoBSaptonoAMurthiR. Secure telemonitoring system for delivering telerehabilitation therapy to enhance children's communication function to home. Telemed J E Health2008; 14: 905–911.
96.
HowellSTripolitiEPringT. Delivering the Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT) by web camera: A feasibility study. Int J Lang Commun Disord2009; 44: 287–300.
97.
BurnsCLWardECHillAJ. A pilot trial of a speech pathology telehealth service for head and neck cancer patients. J Telemed Telecare2012; 18: 443–446.
98.
ConstantinescuG. Satisfaction with telemedicine for teaching listening and spoken language to children with hearing loss. J Telemed Telecare2012; 18: 267–272.
99.
WardLWhiteJRussellT. Assessment of communication and swallowing function post laryngectomy: A telerehabilitation trial. J Telemed Telecare2007; 13: 88–91.
100.
WardECrombieJTrickeyM. Assessment of communication and swallowing post-laryngectomy: A telerehabilitation trial. J Telemed Telecare2009; 15: 232–237.
101.
ConstantinescuGTheodorosDRussellT. Assessing disordered speech and voice in Parkinson's disease: A telerehabilitation application. Int J Lang Commun Disord2010; 45: 630–644.
102.
CicciaAHWhitfordBKrummM. Improving the access of young urban children to speech, language and hearing screening via telehealth. J Telemed Telecare2011; 17: 240–244.
103.
AmirOShabtaiE. Public information services in the field of communication disorders: Comparison between teleservice and E-service. Telemed J E Health2002; 8: 369–375.
104.
GlykasMChytasP. Technology assisted speech and language therapy. Int J Med Inform2004; 73: 529–541.
105.
GlykasMChytasP. Next generation of methods and tools for team work based care in speech and language therapy. Telematics Inform2005; 22: 135–160.
106.
CnossenICde BreeRRinkelR. Computerized monitoring of patient-reported speech and swallowing problems in head and neck cancer patients in clinical practice. Support Care Cancer2012; 20: 2925–2931.
107.
GoldbergSHaleyKLJacksA. Script training and generalization for people with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol2012; 21: 222–238.
108.
WaiteMCTheodorosDGRussellTG. Assessing children's speech intelligibility and oral structures, and functions via an Internet-based telehealth system. J Telemed Telecare2012; 18: 198–203.
109.
DunkleyCPattieLWilsonL. A comparison of rural speech-language pathologists' and residents' access to and attitudes towards the use of technology for speech-language pathology service delivery. Int J Speech Lang Pathol2010; 12: 333–343.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
