We carried out a cost-benefit analysis of the STAY telecare service (Sandwell Telecare Assisting You) for unpaid carers of people with dementia in the West Midlands. This was done from the perspective of the carers. We employed the willingness to pay (WTP) approach, an established economic method to quantify the benefits of healthcare. A questionnaire was given to 87 unpaid carers of people with dementia, and 34 completed questionnaires were returned (39%). Two WTP question designs were used (open-ended and bounded style). The annual mean WTP for telecare was £242-310 per person. Carers offered higher values if the cared-for person was suffering from moderate dementia. Carers offered WTP values that were similar to the resource costs of providing telecare services. The pilot study suggests that the provision of telecare for unpaid carers of people with dementia is beneficial to society.
PinquartMSörensenS. Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging2003; 18: 250–67.
4.
LuppaMLuckTBrählerEKönigHHRiedel-HellerSG. Prediction of institutionalisation in dementia. A systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord2008; 26: 65–78.
BarlowJSinghDBayerSCurryR. A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare2007; 13: 172–9.
DaviesARixonLNewmanS. Systematic review of the effects of telecare provided for a person with social care needs on outcomes for their informal carers. Health Social Care Community2013; 21: 582–97.
KinneyJMKartCSMurdochLAConleyCJ. Striving to provide safety assistance for families of elders: the SAFE house project. Dementia2004; 3: 351–370.
12.
BealeSTruemanPSandersonDKrugerJ. The initial evaluation of the Scottish Telecare Development Program. J Technol Hum Serv2010; 28: 60–73.
13.
WoolhamJ. Safe at Home: the effectiveness of assistive technology in supporting the independence of people with dementia: the safe at home project, London: Hawker Publications Limited, 2006.
14.
MitchellRCCarsonRT. Using Surveys To Value Public Goods. the contingent valuation method, Washington DC: RFF Press, 1989.
Al-JanabiHFrewEBrouwerWRappangeDVan ExelJ. The inclusion of positive aspects of caring in the Caregiver Strain Index: tests of feasibility and validity. Int J Nurs Stud2010; 47: 984–93.
LoehmanETBergSVArroyoAA. Distributional analysis of regional benefits and cost of air quality control. J Environ Econ Manage1979; 6: 222–243.
19.
KenkelDBergerMBlomquistGContingent valuation in health. In: TollyGKenkelDFabianR (eds). Valuing Health for Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994, pp. 72–104.
20.
BeesleyL. Informal Care in England, London: Kings Fund, 2006.
JaanaMParéGSicotteC. Home telemonitoring for respiratory conditions: a systematic review. Am J Manag Care2009; 15: 313–20.
24.
SachTHWhynesDKO'NeillCO'DonoghueGMArchboldSM. Willingness-to-pay for pediatric cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol2004; 68: 91–9.
25.
HealeyAChisholmD. Willingness to pay as a measure of the benefits of mental health care. J Ment Health Policy Econ1999; 2: 55–58.
26.
BradfordWDKleitAKrousel-WoodMAReRM. Comparing willingness to pay for telemedicine across a chronic heart failure and hypertension population. Telemed J E Health2005; 11: 430–8.
27.
QureshiAABrandling-BennettHAWittenbergEChenSCSoberAJKvedarJC. Willingness-to-pay stated preferences for telemedicine versus in-person visits in patients with a history of psoriasis or melanoma. Telemed J E Health2006; 12: 639–43.
28.
TsujiMSuzukiWTaokaF. An empirical analysis of a telehealth system in terms of cost-sharing. J Telemed Telecare2003; 9(Suppl. 1): 41–3.
