A qualitative case study of telehealth for in-home monitoring to support the management of type 2 diabetes

Abstract

The present study formed part of a randomised controlled trial of telehealth for in-home monitoring to support people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. We explored the experiences of patients and healthcare practitioners, and their perceptions of the telehealth model of care used in the trial. In addition to their usual diabetes care, participants receive diabetes care from a diabetes educator nurse via an in-home broadband communication device. On average, each patient participated in 14 videoconferences with a diabetes care coordinator during the 12-month trial period. Qualitative data was collected from two general practices and included semi-structured interviews and document review of patient clinical notes. A total of 12 people were interviewed: 8 health practitioners and 4 patients. Patients and health practitioners expressed a high level of satisfaction with the model of care provided. Patients also reported positive health and social outcomes as a result of being involved in the trial and indicated that in the main they had achieved their goals and were happy with their progress over the 12-month period. Analysis of interviews revealed three broad elements associated with the implementation of telehealth: interpersonal factors, operational problems and the wider health system context within which the general practices and trial team were operating. The findings suggest that adopting telehealth in the management of type 2 diabetes can lead to improved diabetes control, but more support is required to ensure sustainability and widespread implementation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Institute for Primary Care. System Reform and Development for Chronic Disease Management. See http://www.health.gov.au/internet/nhhrc/publishing.nsf/Content/038-aipclatrobe/$FILE/038%20Australian%20Institute%20for%20Primary%20Care,%20La%20Trobe%20University%20Attachment%20B.pdf (last checked 15 August 2013).

National Health and Hospital Reform Commission. A Healthier Future for All Australians. See http://www.health.gov.au/internet/nhhrc/publishing.nsf/content/1AFDEAF1FB76A1D8CA257600000B5BE2/$File/Final_Report_of_the%20nhhrc_June_2009.pdf (last checked 15 August 2013).

Productivity Commission. Australia’s Health Workforce. See http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/9480/healthworkforce.pdf (last checked 15 August 2013).

Macinko

Starfield

Shi

. Quantifying the health benefits of primary care physician supply in the United States. Int J Health Serv 2007; 37: 111–126.

Norris

Engelgau

Narayan

. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 561–587.

Darkins

Ryan

Kobb

. Care coordination/home telehealth: the systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemed J E Health 2008; 14: 1118–1126.

Steventon

Bardsley

Billings

. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2012; 344: e3874–e3874.

World Health Organization. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in member states. Available from http://www.who.int/goe/publications/ehealth_series_vol2/en/ (last checked 7 August 2013).

Wootton

. Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management -- an evidence synthesis. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18: 211–220.

10.

Mistry

. Systematic review of studies of the cost effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare. Changes in the economic evidence over twenty years. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18: 1–6.

11.

Barlow

Singh

Bayer

Curry

. A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail and elderly people and those with long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare 2007; 13: 172–179.

12.

Moffat

Eley

. Barriers to the uptake of telemedicine in Australia -- a view from the providers. Rural Remote Health 2010; 11: 1581–1581.

13.

Tracy

Rheuban

Waters

DeVany

Whitten

. Critical steps to scaling telehealth for national reform. Telemed J E Health 2008; 14: 990–994.

14.

Watson

Gasser

Blignault

Collins

. Taking telehealth to the bush: lessons from North Queensland. J Telemed Telecare 2001; 7(Suppl. 2): 20–23.

15.

Carlisle

Warren

Scuffham

Cheffins

. Randomised controlled trial of an in-home monitoring intervention to improve health outcomes for type 2 diabetes: study protocol. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 182: 43–51.

16.

Broen

Huis in’t Veld

Vollenbroek-Hutten

Hermens

van Halteren

Nieuwenhuis

. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementation: a literature study. J Telemed Telecare 2007; 13: 303–309.

17.

Wade

Eliott

. The role of the champion in telehealth service development: a qualitative analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2012; 18: 490–492.

18.

May

Finch

Cornford

. Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: what needs to be done? BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 131–131.

19.

Department of Health and Ageing. National E-health Strategy. See http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/National+Ehealth+Strategy (last checked 7 August 2013).

20.

Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy. National Digital Economy Strategy. See http://www.nbn.gov.au/files/2011/05/National_Digital_Economy_Strategy.pdf (last checked 15 August 2013).

21.

Royal Australian College of General Practictioners. Guidelines for video consultations in general practice. Available from http://www.racgp.org.au/telehealth (last checked 7 August 2013).

22.

Department of Health and Ageing. Specialist video consultations under Medicare See http://www.mbsonline.gov.au/telehealth (last checked 7 August 2013).