We carried out a critical appraisal and synthesis of the systematic reviews and meta-analyses of remote monitoring for heart failure. A comprehensive literature search identified 65 relevant publications from 3333 citations. Seventeen studies fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Seven (41%) systematic reviews pooled results for meta-analysis. Eight (47%) considered all non-invasive remote monitoring strategies. Five (29%) focused on telemonitoring. Four (24%) included both non-invasive and invasive technologies. The reviews were appraised by two independent reviewers for their quality and risk of bias using the AMSTAR tool. According to the AMSTAR criteria, ten (58%) systematic reviews were of poor methodological quality. In the high quality reviews, the relative risk of mortality in patients who received remote monitoring ranged from 0.53 to 0.88. The high quality reviews also reported that remote monitoring reduced the relative risk of all-cause (0.52 to 0.96) and heart failure-related hospitalizations (0.72 to 0.79) and, as a consequence, healthcare costs. However, further research is required before considering widespread implementation of remote monitoring. The subset of the heart failure population that derives the most benefit from intensive monitoring, the best technology, and the optimum duration of monitoring, all need to be identified.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GhersiDPangT. From Mexico to Mali: four years in the history of clinical trial registration. J Evid Based Med2009; 2: 1–7.
2.
Higgins JPT, Green S (eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. See http://www.cochrane-handbook.org (last checked 28 June 2013).
3.
BastianHGlasziouPChalmersI. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?PLoS Med2010; 7: e1000326–e1000326.
4.
MoherDTetzlaffJTriccoACSampsonMAltmanDG. Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews. PLoS Med2007; 4: e78–e78.
5.
von LuederTGKrumH. Current modalities for invasive and non-invasive monitoring of volume status in heart failure. Heart2012; 98: 967–73.
6.
InglisSCClarkRAMcAlisterFAStewartSClelandJG. Which components of heart failure programmes are effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of structured telephone support or telemonitoring as the primary component of chronic heart failure management in 8323 patients: Abridged Cochrane Review. Eur J Heart Fail2011; 13: 1028–40.
7.
SheaBJGrimshawJMWellsGA. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol2007; 7: 10–10.
8.
HatalaRKeitzSWyerP. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results. CMAJ2005; 172: 661–5.
9.
ClarkRAInglisSCMcAlisterFAClelandJGStewartS. Telemonitoring or structured telephone support programmes for patients with chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ2007; 334: 942–942.
10.
InglisSCClarkRAMcAlisterFA. Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2010; (8): CD007228–CD007228.
11.
KlersyCDe SilvestriAGabuttiG. Economic impact of remote patient monitoring: an integrated economic model derived from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail2011; 13: 450–9.
12.
KlersyCDe SilvestriAGabuttiGRegoliFAuricchioA. A meta-analysis of remote monitoring of heart failure patients. J Am Coll Cardiol2009; 54: 1683–94.
13.
ClarkeMShahASharmaU. Systematic review of studies on telemonitoring of patients with congestive heart failure: a meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare2011; 17: 7–14.
14.
PolisenaJTranKCimonK. Home telemonitoring for congestive heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare2010; 16: 68–76.
15.
LeeJParkS. The effectiveness of telephone-based post-discharge nursing care in decreasing readmission rate in patients with heart failure: a systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews2010; 8: 1288–303.
16.
DangSDimmickSKelkarG. Evaluating the evidence base for the use of home telehealth remote monitoring in elderly with heart failure. Telemed J E Health2009; 15: 783–96.
17.
MartínezAEverssERojo-AlvarezJLFigalDPGarcía-AlberolaA. A systematic review of the literature on home monitoring for patients with heart failure. J Telemed Telecare2006; 12: 234–41.
18.
CherofskyNOnuaESawoDSlavinELevinR. Telehealth in adult patients with congestive heart failure in long term home health care: a systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews2011; 9: 1271–96.
19.
ChaudhrySIMatteraJACurtisJP. Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med2010; 363: 2301–9.
20.
ChaudhrySIPhillipsCOStewartSS. Telemonitoring for patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review. J Card Fail2007; 13: 56–62.
21.
RadhakrishnanKJacelonC. Impact of telehealth on patient self-management of heart failure: a review of literature. J Cardiovasc Nurs2012; 27: 33–43.
22.
GiamouzisGMastrogiannisDKoutrakisK. Telemonitoring in chronic heart failure: a systematic review. Cardiol Res Pract2012; 2012: 410820–410820.
23.
KraaiIHLuttikMLde JongRMJaarsmaTHillegeHL. Heart failure patients monitored with telemedicine: patient satisfaction, a review of the literature. J Card Fail2011; 17: 684–90.
24.
SetoE. Cost comparison between telemonitoring and usual care of heart failure: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health2008; 14: 679–86.
25.
LouisAATurnerTGrettonMBakshAClelandJG. A systematic review of telemonitoring for the management of heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail2003; 5: 583–90.
26.
MaricBKaanAIgnaszewskiALearSA. A systematic review of telemonitoring technologies in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail2009; 11: 506–17.
27.
KoehlerFWinklerSSchieberM. Impact of remote telemedical management on mortality and hospitalizations in ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure: the telemedical interventional monitoring in heart failure study. Circulation2011; 123: 1873–80.
28.
BarnasonSZimmermanLNieveenJSchmadererMCarranzaBReillyS. Impact of a home communication intervention for coronary artery bypass graft patients with ischemic heart failure on self-efficacy, coronary disease risk factor modification, and functioning. Heart Lung2003; 32: 147–58.
29.
RamaekersBLJanssen-BoyneJJGorgelsAPVrijhoefHJ. Adherence among telemonitored patients with heart failure to pharmacological and nonpharmacological recommendations. Telemed J E Health2009; 15: 517–24.
30.
JohnstonBWheelerLDeuserJSousaKH. Outcomes of the Kaiser Permanente Tele-Home Health Research Project. Arch Fam Med2000; 9: 40–5.
31.
BalkAHDavidseWDommelenPv. Tele-guidance of chronic heart failure patients enhances knowledge about the disease. A multi-centre, randomised controlled study. Eur J Heart Fail2008; 10: 1136–42.
32.
AnkerSDKoehlerFAbrahamWT. Telemedicine and remote management of patients with heart failure. Lancet2011; 378: 731–9.
33.
FallickCSobotkaPADunlapME. Sympathetically mediated changes in capacitance: redistribution of the venous reservoir as a cause of decompensation. Circ Heart Fail2011; 4: 669–75.
34.
KoehlerFWinklerSSchieberM. Telemedicine in heart failure: pre-specified and exploratory subgroup analyses from the TIM-HF trial. Int J Cardiol2012; 161: 143–50.
35.
ChippsJBrysiewiczPMarsM. Effectiveness and feasibility of telepsychiatry in resource constrained environments? A systematic review of the evidence. Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg)2012; 15: 235–43.
36.
SavardLAThompsonDRClarkAM. A meta-review of evidence on heart failure disease management programs: the challenges of describing and synthesizing evidence on complex interventions. Trials2011; 12: 194–194.
37.
MoherDPhamBLawsonMLKlassenTP. The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess2003; 7: 1–90.
