In this article, we explore smart deterrents and their historical precedents marketed to women and girls for the purpose of preventing harassment, sexual abuse and violence. Rape deterrents, as we define them, encompass customs, architectures, fashions, surveillant infrastructures, apps and devices conceived to manage and protect the body. Online searches reveal an array of technologies, and we engage with their prevention narratives and cultural construction discourses of the gendered body. Our critical analysis places recent rape deterrents in conversation with earlier technologies to untangle the persistent logics. These are articulated with reference to the ways that proto-digital technologies have been imported into the realm of ubiquitous computing and networks. Our conceptual framework offers novel pathways for discussing feminine bodies and their messy navigation of everyday life that include both threats to corporeal safety and collective imaginings of empowerment.
AndrejevicMark (2007) Surveillance in the digital enclosure. The Communication Review10(4): 295–317.
2.
BaberJamesDaviesStephenDayanLinda (2007) An extra pair of eyes: Do patients want a chaperone when having an anogenital examination?Sexual Health4(2): 89–93.
3.
BeatonBrian (2015) Safety as net work: ‘Apps against abuse’ and the digital labour of sexual assault prevention. Media Tropes5(1): 105–124.
4.
BederaNicoleNordmeyerKristjane (2015) ‘Never go out alone’: An analysis of college rape prevention tips. Sexuality & Culture19(3): 533–542.
5.
BiressiAnita (2019) Following the money: News, sexual assault and the economic logic of the gendered public sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies22(5–6): 595–612.
6.
BivensRenaHasinoffAmy Adele (2018) Rape: Is there an app for that? An empirical analysis of the features of anti-rape apps. Information, Communication & Society21(8): 1050–1067.
7.
BlayneyJessicaJenzerTiffanyReadJennifer, et al. (2018) Enlisting friends to reduce sexual victimization risk: There’s an app for that…but nobody uses it. Journal of American College Health66(8): 767–773.
8.
BrowneSimone (2015) Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
CampbellAlex (2005) Keeping the ‘lady’ safe: The regulation of femininity through crime prevention literature. Critical Criminology13(2): 119–140.
10.
CasilliAntonio (2010) A history of virulence: The body and computer culture in the 1980s. Body & Society16(4): 1–31.
11.
CeccatoVaniaWiebeDouglasEshraghiBita, et al. (2017) Women’s mobility and the situational conditions of rape: Cases reported to hospitals. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Epub ahead of print 27 April 2017. DOI: 10.1177/0886260517699950.
12.
ChrismanKimberly (1996) Unhoop the fair sex: The campaign against the hoop petticoat in eighteenth-century England. Eighteenth-Century Studies30(1): 5–23.
13.
ClassenAlbrecht (2007) The Chastity Belt: A Myth-making Process. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
CumiskeyKathleenBrewsterKendra (2012) Mobile phones or pepper spray?Feminist Media Studies12(4): 590–599.
15.
DavidoffLenore (2003) Gender and the ‘great divide’: Public and private in British gender history. Journal of Women’s History15(1): 11–27.
16.
EisenhutKatharinaSauerbornElaGarcía-MorenoClaudia, et al. (2020) Mobile applications addressing violence against women: A systematic review. British Medical Journal Global Health5(4): 1–10.
17.
FieldsJill (2002) Erotic modesty: (Ad)dressing female sexuality and propriety in open and closed drawers, USA 1800–1930. Gender & History14(3): 492–515.
18.
FriedbergAnn (1993) Window Shopping, Cinema and the Postmodern. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19.
GrahamFiona (2013) Wearable technology: The bra designed to shock attackers. BBC News, 16 April. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-22110443(accessed 26 September 2021).
20.
HarawayDonna (1987) A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Australian Feminist Studies2(4): 1–42.
21.
HarawayDonna (1990) A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. In: NicholsonLinda (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism. London: Routledge.
22.
HenneKathryn (2020) Possibilities of feminist technoscience studies of sport: Beyond cyborg bodies. In: SterlingJenniferMcDonaldMary (eds) Sports, Society, and Technology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
23.
JainJasbir (2008) The purdah, patriarchal and tropical sun. In: HeathJennifer (ed.) The Veil: Women Writers on Its History, Lore, and Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
JohnsonNatashaPhilipsonElliotCurryStephen (1999) Chaperone use by obstetrician/gynaecologists. Journal of Reproductive Medicine44(5): 423–427.
25.
Köhler-RollefsonIlse (2018) Purdah, purse and patriarchy: The position of women in the Raika shepherd community in Rajasthan (India). Journal of Arid Environments149: 30–39.
26.
LeeMark (2017) A time to act: Fatal violence against transgender people in America. Center for Victim Research Repository. Available at: https://ncvc.dspacedirect.org/handle/20.500.11990/650(accessed 26 September 2021).
LyonDavid (2014) Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society1(2): 1–13.
29.
McDougalLotusKrumholzSamuelBhanNandita, et al. (2021) Releasing the tide: How has a shock to the acceptability of gender-based sexual violence affected rape reporting to police in India?Journal of Interpersonal Violence36(11–12): 5921–5943.
30.
MasonCorinneMagnetShoshana (2012) Surveillance studies and violence against women. Surveillance & Society10(2): 105–118.
31.
MaxwellLucySandersAlexSkuesJason, et al. (2020) A content analysis of personal safety apps: Are they keeping us safe or making us more vulnerable?Violence Against Women26(2): 233–248.
32.
MendesKaitlynnKellerJessalynnRingroseJessica (2019) Digitized narratives of sexual violence: Making sexual violence felt and known through digital disclosures. New Media & Society21(6): 1290–1310.
33.
NegrinLlewellyn (2002) Cosmetic surgery and the eclipse of identity. Body & Society8(4): 21–42.
34.
OrendorfJennifer (2009) Architectural chastity belts: The window motif as instrument of discipline in Italian fifteenth-century conduct manuals and art. MA Thesis, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
35.
PhadkeShilpaKhanSameeraRanadeShilpa (2011) Why Loiter? Women and Risk on Mumbai Streets. New Delhi: Penguin.
36.
ReesGethinWhiteDeborah (2012) Vindictive but vulnerable: Paradoxical representations of women as demonstrated in internet discourse surrounding an anti-rape technology. Women’s Studies International Forum35(6): 426–431.
37.
RimesKatherineGoodshipNicolaUssherGreg, et al. (2019) Non-binary and binary transgender youth: Comparison of mental health, self-harm, suicidality, substance use and victimization experiences. International Journal of Transgenderism20(2–3): 230–240.
38.
ShapiroEve (2015) Gender Circuits: Bodies and Identities in a Technological Age, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
ShelbyRenee (2020) Techno-physical feminism: Anti-rape technology, gender, and corporeal surveillance. Feminist Media Studies20(8): 1088–1109.
40.
SmithGavin (2016) Surveillance, data, and embodiment: On the work of being watched. Body & Society22(2): 108–139.
41.
TangeAndrea (2010) Architectural Identities: Domesticity, Literature and the Victorian Middle Classes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
42.
WhiteDeborahMcMillanLesley (2020) Innovating the problem away? A critical study of anti-rape technologies. Violence Against Women26(10): 1120–1140.
43.
WhiteDeborahReesGethin (2014) Self-defense or undermining the self? Exploring the possibilities and limitations of a novel anti-rape technology. Violence Against Women20(3): 360–368.
44.
WilsonMatthew (2009) Cyborg geographies: Towards hybrid epistemologies. Gender, Place and Culture16(5): 499–516.
45.
WrightJordanaHeynenRobertvan derMeulenEmily (2015) It depends on who you are, what you are: Community safety and sex workers’ experience with surveillance. Surveillance & Society13(2): 265–282.
