This article intervenes into contemporary scholarship on affect by bringing different affect theories into the same analytical frame. Analysing commercial surrogacy in India through three different conceptualizations of affect found in the work of Michael Hardt, Sara Ahmed and Brian Massumi reveals how affect emerges as a malleable state in the practice of, as a circulatory force in the debates around, and as an ephemeral intensity in the spontaneous resistance to surrogacy. Based on this analysis, I suggest that integrating different theories of affect enables more holistic examinations of corporeal regulation by opening our understanding to the multiple lives of affect that operate on the level of political economy, cultural signification and material intensity simultaneously.
BerardiFranco (2009) The Soul at Work. New York: Semiotext(e).
7.
BerlantLaurent (1997) The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
BerlantLaurent (2011) Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
BlackmanLisa (2013) Habit and affect: Revitalizing a forgotten history. Body & Society19(2–3): 186–216.
10.
BlackmanLisaVennCouze (2010) Affect. Body & Society16(1): 7–28.
11.
BrennanTeresa (2004) The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
CloughPatricia (2007) Introduction. In: CloughPatricia (ed.) The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13.
CloughPatricia (2008) The affective turn: Political economy, biomedia, and bodies. Theory, Culture & Society25(1): 1–22.
14.
CohenLawrence (2001) The other kidney: Biopolitics beyond recognition. Body & Society7(2–3): 9–29.
15.
CrockinSusan (2013) Growing families in a shrinking world: Legal and ethical challenges in cross-border surrogacy. Reproductive Biomedicine Online27(6): 733–741.
16.
CvetkovichAnn (2012) Depression: A Public Feeling. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
Dalla CostaMariarosaJamesSelma (1973) The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
18.
DeomampoDaisy (2013) Transnational surrogacy in India: Interrogating power and women’s agency. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies34(3): 167–188.
19.
DeomampoDaisy (2016) Transnational Reproduction: Race, Kinship, and Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: New York University Press.
20.
DeySoma (2016) The new Surrogacy Bill 2016: Is exclusion the only form of effective regulation?Journal of Reproductive Health and Medicine2(suppl. 1): 53–56.
21.
FergusonAnn (1989) Blood at the Root: Motherhood, Sexuality and Male Dominance. London: Pandora.
22.
FredericiSilvia (2008) Precarious labor: A feminist viewpoint. Journal of Aesthetics and Protest37: 54–72.
23.
GunewSneja (2016) Guest Editorial: Decolonizing affect theory. Samyukta: A Journal of Women’s Studies16(1): 7–15.
HardtMichaelNegriAntonio (2001) Empire. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
HardtMichaelNegriAntonio (2005) Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin.
27.
HemmingsClare (2005) Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies19(5): 548–567.
28.
HemmingsClare (2011) Why Stories Matter: The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
HenriquesJulian (2010) The vibrations of affect and their propagation on a night out on Kingston’s dancehall scene. Body & Society16(1): 57–89.
30.
HenriquesJulianTiainenMillaVäliahoPasi (2014) Rhythm returns: Movement and cultural theory. Body & Society20(3–4): 3–29.
31.
HochschildArlie (2000) Global care chains and emotional surplus value. In: HuttonWillGiddensAnthony (eds) On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism. London: Jonathan Cape.
32.
HochschildArlie (2012) The Outsourced Self: Intimate Life in Market Times. London: Macmillan.
33.
JaggarAlison (1996) Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. Inquiry32(2): 151–176.
34.
LatimerJoannaMieleMara (2013) Naturecultures? Science, affect and the non- human. Theory, Culture & Society30(7–8): 5–31.
35.
LazarattoMaurizio (2006) Immaterial labour. In: VirnoPaoloHardtMichael (eds) Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
LeysRuth (2011) The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry37(3): 434–472.
38.
MalhotraAnil (2016) Surrogacy in India at crossroads. Journal of Reproductive Health and Medicine2(1): 16–17.
39.
MassumiBrian (1995) The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique31(2): 83–109.
40.
MassumiBrian (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41.
MolAnnemarie (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
42.
PandeAmrita (2009a) ‘It may be her eggs but it’s my blood’: Surrogates and everyday forms of kinship in India. Qualitative Sociology32(4): 379–397.
43.
PandeAmrita (2009b) Not an ‘angel’, not a ‘whore’: Surrogates as ‘dirty’ workers in India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies16(2): 141–173.
44.
PandeAmrita (2010) Commercial surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a perfect mother-worker. Signs35(4): 969–992.
45.
PandeAmrita (2011) Transnational commercial surrogacy in India: Gifts for global sisters?Reproductive Biomedicine Online23(5): 618–625.
46.
PandeAmrita (2014) Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India. New York: Columbia University Press.
47.
PapouliasConstantinaCallardFelicity (2010) Biology’s gift: Interrogating the turn to affect. Body & Society16(1): 29–56.
48.
PedwellCarolyn (2017) Mediated habits: Images, networked affect and social change. Subjectivity10(2): 147–169.
49.
RagonéHelena (1994) Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
50.
RudrappaSharmila (2016) What to expect when you’re expecting: The affective economies of consuming surrogacy in India. positions24(1): 281–302.
51.
SedgwickEve (2003) Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
52.
SeigworthGregoryGreggMelissa (2010) An inventory of shimmers. In: SeigworthGregoryGreggMelissa (eds) The Affect Theory Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
53.
SpelmanElizabeth (1989) Anger and insubordination. In: GarryAnnPearsallMarilyn (eds) Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
54.
StennerPaulMoreno-GabrielEduardo. (2013) Liminality and affectivity: The case of deceased organ donation. Subjectivity6(3): 229–253.
TylerImogen (2013) Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.
57.
VennCouze (2010) Individuation, relationality, affect: Rethinking the human in relation to the living. Body & Society16(1): 129–161.
58.
VoraKalindi (2009) Indian transnational surrogacy and the commodification of vital energy. Subjectivity28(1): 266–278.
59.
VoraKalindi (2012) Limits of ‘labor’: Accounting for affect and the biological in transnational surrogacy and service work. South Atlantic Quarterly111(4): 681–700.
60.
WalkerdineValerie (2010) Communal beingness and affect: An exploration of trauma in an ex-industrial community. Body & Society16(1): 91–116.
61.
WetherellMargaret (2012) Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage.
62.
WetherellMargaret (2015) Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society21(2): 139–166.
