Disability and Deleuze

Abstract

Building on Deleuze’s theories of the becoming of bodies, and notions of the geographic maturity of the disabled body we formulate an emplaced model of disability wherein bodies, social expectations and built form intersect in embodied experiences in specific environments to increase or decrease the capacity of disabled children to act in those environments. We join a growing effort to generate a more comprehensive model of disability, which moves beyond a binary between the individual and the social. Drawing on in-depth case studies conducted with 13 physically disabled children, we consider the intersections between their primary environments (homes, schools and neighbourhoods) and the multiple subjectivities they embody. Ultimately we make a case about the importance of responsive, situated models of subjectivity for the development of adaptations, and that physical and social adaptations must respond to these children’s complex and varied needs and desires.

Keywords

children Deleuze disability embodiment geography

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Disability Association (2010) ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.

Badham

(2004) Participation – for a change: Disabled young people lead the way. Children and Society 18 (2): 143–154.

Barker

Weller

(2003) ‘Is it fun?’ Developing children centred research methods. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 23 (1/2): 33–58.

Blunt

Rose

(1994) Writing Women and Space: Colonial and Postcolonial Geographies. New York: Guilford Press.

Boyd

(1997) Challenging the Public/Private Divide: Feminism, Law, and Public Policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Breckenridge

Vogler

(2001) The critical limits of embodiment: Disability’s criticism. Public Culture 13 (3): 349–357.

Burns

Watson

Paterson

(2013) Risky bodies in risky spaces: Disabled people’s pursuit of outdoor leisure. Disability & Society 28 (8): 1059–1073.

Colebrook

(2000) From radical representations to corporeal becomings. Hypatia 15 (2): 76–93.

Crang

(2003) Qualitative methods: Touchy, feely, look-see? Progress in Human Geography 27 (4): 494–504.

10.

Deleuze

(1978) Lecture transcripts on Spinoza’s concept of affect. Cours Vincennes, 24 January. Available at: http://www.webdeleuze.com/php/texte.php?cle=14&groupe=Spinoza&langue=2 (accessed June 2014).

11.

Deleuze

(1997) What children say. In: Essays Critical and Clinical. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

12.

Deleuze

Guattari

(1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

13.

Dorn

(1998) Beyond nomadism: The travel narratives of a ‘cripple’. In: Nast

Pile

(eds) Places through the Body. London: Routledge.

14.

Edwards

Imrie

(2003) Disability and bodies as bearers of value. Sociology 37 (2): 239–256.

15.

Fisher

(2007) Experiential knowledge challenges ‘normality’ and individualized citizenship: Towards ‘another way of being’. Disability & Society 22 (2): 283–298.

16.

Foucault

(1975) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage.

17.

Foucault

(1991) Governmentality. In: Burchell

Gordon

Miller

(eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

18.

Foucault

(2005) Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège of France 1974–1975. New York: St Martin’s Press.

19.

Fraser

(1990) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25 /26: 56–80.

20.

Garland-Thomson

(2002) Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA Journal 14 (3): 1–32.

21.

Garland Thompson

(2011) Misfits: A feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia 26 (3): 591–609.

22.

Garth

Aroni

(2003) ‘I value what you have to say’: Seeking the perspective of children with a disability, not just their parents. Disability & Society 18(5): 561–576.

23.

Gatens

Lloyd

(1999) Collective Imaginings: Spinoza Past and Present. New York: Routledge.

24.

Gibson

(2006) Disability, connectivity and transgressing the autonomous body. Journal of Medical Humanities 27 (3): 187–196.

25.

Gilligan

(1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

26.

Goodley

(2007) Becoming rhizomatic parents: Deleuze, Guattari and disabled babies. Disability & Society 22 (2): 145–160.

27.

Habermas

(1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

28.

Hall

(2000) ‘Blood, brain and bones’: Taking the body seriously in the geography of health and impairment. Area 32(1): 21–29.

29.

Hansen

Philo

(2007) The normality of doing things differently. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 98 (4): 493–506.

30.

Holt

(2004a) Childhood disability and ability: (Dis)ableist geographies of mainstream primary schools. Disability Studies Quarterly 24 (3).

31.

Holt

(2004b) Children with mind–body differences: Performing disability in primary school classrooms. Children’s Geographies 2 (2): 219–236.

32.

Holt

Lea

Bowlby

(2012) Special units for young people on the autistic spectrum in mainstream schools: Sites of normalisation, abnormalisation, inclusion, and exclusion. Environment and Planning A 44: 2191–2260.

33.

Horton

Kraftl

(2006) Not just growing up, but going on: Materials, spacings, bodies, situations. Children’s Geographies 4 (3): 259–276.

34.

Hughes

(2009) Disability activisms: Social model stalwarts and biological citizens. Disability & Society 24 (6): 677–688.

35.

Hulqvist

Dahlberg

(2001) Governing the Child in the New Millennium. New York: Routledge Chapman and Hall.

36.

Hutchinson

(2006) Disabling beliefs? Impaired embodiment in the religious tradition of the West. Body & Society 12 (4): 1–23.

37.

Imrie

(1999) The body, disability and Le Corbusier’s conception of the radiant environment. In: Butler

Parr

(eds) Mind and Body Spaces: Geographies of Illness Impairment and Disability. New York: Routledge.

38.

Imrie

(2004) Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home. Housing Studies 19 (5): 745–763.

39.

Imrie

(2012) Universalism, universal design and equitable access to the built environment. Disability and Rehabilitation 34 (10): 873–882.

40.

Inahara

(2009) This body which is not one: The body, femininity and disability. Body & Society 15 (1): 47–62.

41.

James

Jenks

Prout

(1998) Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.

42.

Kitchin

(2001) Using participatory action research approaches in geographical studies of disability: Some reflections. Disability Studies Quarterly 21 (4): 61–69.

43.

Kraftl

(2013) Beyond ‘voice’, beyond ‘agency’, beyond ‘politics’? Hybrid childhoods and some critical reflections on children’s emotional geographies. Emotion, Space and Society 9: 13–23.

44.

Longhurst

(1995) The body and geography. Gender, Place & Culture 2 (1): 97–106.

45.

Longhurst

(1997) (Dis)embodied geographies. Progress in Human Geography 21(4): 486–501.

46.

Longhurst

(2001) Bodies: Exploring Fluid Boundaries. London: Routledge.

47.

Manning

(2009) What if it didn’t all begin and end with containment? Toward a leaky sense of self. Body & Society 15 (3): 33–45.

48.

Marks

(1999) Dimensions of oppression: Theorising the embodied subject. Disability & Society 14 (5): 611–626.

49.

McCormack

(2008) Geographies for moving bodies: Thinking, dancing, spaces. Geography Compass 2 (6): 1822–1836.

50.

Milner

Kelly

(2009) Community participation and inclusion: People with disabilities defining their place. Disability & Society 24 (1): 47–62.

51.

Morris

(2001) Social exclusion and young disabled people with high levels of support needs. Critical Social Policy 21 (2): 161–183.

52.

Moss

Dyck

(2002) Embodying social geography. In: Anderson

Domosh

Pile

Thrift

(eds) Handbook of Social Geography. London: Sage.

53.

Nast

Pile

(1998) Places through the Body. London: Routledge.

54.

Nieuwenhuys

(1994) Children’s Lifeworlds: Gender, Welfare, and Labour in the Developing World. New York: Routledge.

55.

Perske

(1972) The dignity of risk and the mentally retarded. Mental Retardation 10 (1): 24–27.

56.

Pole

Mizen

Bolton

(1999) Realising children’s agency in research: Partners and participants? International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2(1): 39–54

57.

Rabinow

Rose

(2003) Introduction. In: Rabinow

Rose

(eds) Foucault Today. New York: New Press.

58.

Raman

Boyce

Pickett

(2009) Associations between adolescent risk behaviours and injury: The modifying role of disability. Journal of School Health 79 (1): 8–16.

59.

Robbins

Marks

(2010) Assemblage geographies. In: Smith

Pain

Marsden

Jones

III JP

(eds) The Sage Handbook of Social Geographies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

60.

Rose

(1997) Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography 21 (3): 305–320.

61.

Rose

(1999) The gaze of the psychologist. In: Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Free Association Books.

62.

Ruddick

(2012) Power and the problem of composition. Dialogues in Human Geography 2 (2): 207–211.

63.

Schloss

Alper

Jayne

(1993) Self-determination for persons with disabilities: Choice, risk, and dignity. Exceptional Children 60: 215–225.

64.

Shakespeare

Watson

(2002) The social model of disability: An outdated ideology? Research in Social Science and Disability 2: 9–28.

65.

Shildrick

Price

(1996) Breaking the boundaries of the broken body. Body & Society 2 (4): 93–113.

66.

Simondon

(2009) The position of the problem of ontogenesis. Parrhesia 7: 4–16.

67.

Smith

(1998) Risk and Our Pedagogical Relation to Children: On the Playground and Beyond. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

68.

Thrift

(1997) The still point: Resistance, expressive embodiment and dance. In: Pile

(ed.) Geographies of Resistance. New York: Routledge.

69.

Tremain

(2005) Foucault and the Government of Disability. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

70.

Valerie

(2007) ‘Nobody’s just normal, you know’: The social creation of developmental disability. Social Science & Medicine 65: 1630–1641.

71.

Varley

(2008) A place like this? Stories of dementia, home, and the self. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26: 47–67.

72.

von Benzon

(2010) Moving on from ramps? The utility of the social model of disability for facilitating experiences of nature for disabled children. Disability & Society 25 (5): 617–626.

73.

Watson

(2009) The ‘impossible vanity’: Uses and abuses of empathy in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Research 9 (1): 105–117.

74.

Wilton

(2009) Towards enabling geographies? Reconsidering the role of paid work in the lives of disabled people. Talk given for ‘Intersections’ in the Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, 19 March.