In Aotearoa/New Zealand, organ donation and transplantation rates for Māori and non-Māori differ. This article outlines why this is so, and why some groups may be reticent about or object to organ donation and transplantation. In order to do this, I draw on the conceptual and methodological lens of phenomenology and apply what Van Manen calls the existential themes of lived body (corporeality), lived space (spatiality), lived time (temporality) and lived other (relationality and communality) to a discussion of the cultural values and spiritual beliefs of Māori around tissue donation. Specifically, the aim of the article is to encourage non-Māori, who will already be aware that diverse cultural traditions transmit different beliefs about organ donation and transplantation, to recognize the existence of a deeper understanding of what this difference may mean for people on a felt level and how it might impact on lived experience.
Auckland Regional Renal Project (2005) Renal Services: A Plan for the Short and Long Term. Auckland District Health Board, Counties Manukau Health Board, Waitemata District Health Board.
2.
Csordas, T.J. ( 1993) ‘Somatic Modes of Attention’, Cultural Anthropology8(2): 135-56.
3.
Csordas, T.J. ( 1999) ‘Embodiment and Cultural Phenomenology’ pp. 143-62 in G. Weiss and H.F. Haber (eds) Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections of Nature and Culture. New York: Routledge.
4.
Dickenson, D. ( 2005) ‘Human Tissue and Global Ethics’, Genomics, Society and Policy1(1): 41-53.
5.
Diprose, R. ( 2002) Corporeal Generosity: On Giving with Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty, and Levinas. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
6.
Diprose, R. and J. Reynolds (eds) (2008) Merleau-Ponty: Key Concepts. Stocksfield: Acumen Publishing.
7.
Durie, Mason ( 2008) ‘Bioethics in Research: The Ethics of Indigeneity’, Ninth Global Forum on Bioethics in Research (GFBR9), URL (consulted March 2009): Http://www.hrc.govt.nz/assets/ pdfs/publications/Mason%20Durie%20-%20Ethics%20of%20Indigeneity.pdf
8.
Faire, B. and I. Dittmer ( 2008) ‘Improving Equity of Access to Deceased Donor Kidneys in New Zealand’, Progress in Transplantation18(1): 10-12.
9.
Fielding, H.A. ( 1999) ‘Envisioning the Other: Lacan and Merleau-Ponty on Intersubjectivity’, pp. 185-99 in D. Olkowski and J. Morley (eds) Merleau-Ponty, Interiority and Exteriority, Psychic Life and the World. Albany, NY : State University of New York.
10.
Gearing, R.E. ( 2004) ‘Bracketing in Research: A Typology’, Qualitative Health Research14: 1429-52.
11.
Glover, M. and B. Rousseau ( 2007) ‘‘‘Your Child is Your Whakapapa’’: Māori Considerations of Assisted Human Reproduction and Relatedness’ , Sites: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Cultural Studies4(2): 117-36.
12.
Grosz, E. ( 1994) Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
13.
Guttman, A. and R.D. Guttman ( 1993) ‘Attitudes of Healthcare Professionals and the Public Towards the Sale of Kidneys for Transplantation’, Journal of Medical Ethics19: 148-53.
14.
Hacking, I. ( 2007) ‘Our Neo-Cartesian Bodies in Parts’, Critical Inquiry34: 78-105.
15.
Haddow, G. ( 2004) ‘Donor and Nondonor Families’ Accounts of Communication and Relations with Healthcare Professionals’, Progress in Transplantation14(1): 41-8.
16.
Haddow, G. ( 2005) ‘The Phenomenology of Death, Embodiment and Organ Transplantation’, Sociology of Health & Illness27(1): 92-113.
17.
Kesselring, A., M. Kainz and A. Kiss ( 2006) ‘Traumatic Memories of Relatives Regarding Brain Death, Request for Organ Donation and Interactions with Professionals in the ICU’, American Journal of Transplantation6: 1-7.
18.
Leder, D. ( 1999) ‘Whose Body? What Body? The Metaphysics of Organ Transplantation’, pp. 233-64 in M.J. Cherry (ed.) Persons and their Bodies: Rights, Responsibilities, Relationships. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19.
Lewis, G. and N. Pickering ( 2003) ‘Māori Spiritual Beliefs and Attitudes towards Organ Donation’, New Zealand Bioethics Journal4(1): 31-5.
20.
Lock, M. ( 2002) Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death . Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
21.
Lock, M. and M. Crowley-Makota ( 2008) ‘Situating the Practice of Organ Donation in Familial, Cultural, and Political Context’, Transplantation Reviews22: 154-7.
22.
McKenny, G.P. ( 1999) ‘The Integrity of the Body: Critical Remarks on a Persistent Theme in Bioethics’, pp. 353-61 in M.J. Cherry (ed.) Persons and their Bodies: Rights, Responsibilities, Relationships. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
23.
Mead, H.M. ( 2003) Tikanga Māori: Living by Māori Values. Wellington: Huia Publishers.
24.
Merleau-Ponty, M. ( 1962) Phenomenology of Perception, trans. C. Smith. London: Routledge.
25.
Merleau-Ponty, M. ( 1968) The Visible and the Invisible (Followed by Working Notes), trans. Alphonso Lingis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
26.
Moustakas, C. ( 1994) Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
Painter, L.M., J.M. Langlands and J. Innes Walker ( 1995) ‘Donor Families’ Experience of Organ Donation: A New Zealand Study’, New Zealand Medical Journal108(28 July): 295-6.
28.
Papagaroufali, E. ( 1999) ‘Donation of Human Organs or Bodies after Death: A Cultural Phenomenology of ‘‘Flesh’’ in the Greek Context’, Ethos27(3): 283-314.
29.
Phoenix Research (2007) Research to Support Initiatives to Maximise Organ and Tissue Donation: Research Report for Ministry of Health. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health.
30.
Roake, J. ( 2002) ‘Gifts of Life in Short Supply’, New Zealand Medical Journal, 115(1159), URL (consulted July 2008): http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/115-1159/126/
31.
Roberts, M. ( 2005) ‘Walking Backwards into the Future: Māori Views on Genetically Modified Organisms’, WINHEC Journal , URL (consulted July 2008): http://www.win-hec.org/docs/pdf/Journal/Mere_Roberts.pdf
32.
Roberts, M. and J.R. Fairweather ( 2004) South Island Māori Perceptions of Biotechnology, Research Report No. 268. Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit.
33.
Rothfield, P. ( 2005) ‘Attending to Difference: Phenomenology and Bioethics’ , pp. 29-48 in M. Shildrick and R. Mykitiuk (eds) Ethics of the Body: Postconventional Challenges. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
Sanner, M.A. ( 2001) ‘Exchanging Spare Parts or Becoming a New Person? People’s Attitudes toward Receiving and Donating Organs’, Social Science & Medicine52(10): 1491-9.
35.
Scheper-Hughes, N. ( 2007) ‘The Tyranny of the Gift: Sacrificial Violence in Living Donor Transplants’, American Journal of Transplantation7: 507-11.
36.
Scheper-Hughes, N. and L. Wacquant (eds) (2002) Commodifying Bodies. London: SAGE.
37.
Shaw, R. ( 2004) ‘The Virtues of Cross-nursing and the ‘‘Yuk Factor’’’, Australian Feminist Studies19(45): 287-99.
38.
Shaw, R. ( 2008) ‘Rethinking Reproductive Gifts as Body Projects’ , Sociology42(1): 11-28.
39.
Sissons, J. ( 2005) First Peoples: Indigenous Cultures and their Futures. London: Reaktion Books.
40.
Taylor, C. ( 1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Thomas, C.M. ( 2006) ‘A Framework for the Collection, Retention and Use of Human Body Parts’, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
42.
Toombs, K. ( 1999) ‘What Does it Mean to be Somebody? Phenomenological Reflections and Ethical Quandaries’, pp. 73-94 in M.J. Cherry (ed.) Persons and their Bodies: Rights, Responsibilities, Relationships. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
43.
Toombs, K. ( 2002) ‘Bodies and Persons’, pp. 36-40 in K.W.M. Fulford, D.L. Dickenson and T.H. Murray (eds) Healthcare Ethics and Human Values: An Introductory Text with Reading and Case Studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
44.
Van Manen, M. ( 1990) Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
45.
Varela, F.J. ( 2001) ‘Intimate Distances - Fragments for a Phenomenology of Organ Transplantation’, URL (consulted August 2008 ): http://www.oikos.org/varelaframents.htm
46.
Waldby, C. ( 2002) ‘Biomedicine, Tissue Transfer and Intercorporeality’ , Feminist Theory3(3): 239-54.
47.
Weiss, G. ( 1999a) The Abject Borders of the Body Image’, pp. 41-59 in G. Weiss and H.F. Haber (eds) Perspectives on Embodiment: The Intersections of Nature and Culture. New York: Routledge.
48.
Weiss, G. ( 1999b) Body Images: Embodiment as Intercorporeality. New York: Routledge.
49.
Wilkinson, T.M. ( 2005) ‘Individual and Family Consent to Organ and Tissue Donation: Is the Current Position Coherent?’, Journal of Medical Ethics31: 587-90.
50.
Wilkinson, T.M. ( 2007) ‘Racist Organ Donors and Saving Lives’, Bioethics21(2): 63-74.
51.
Young, I.M. ( 1997) Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52.
Young, I.M. ( 2005) On Female Body Experience: ‘Throwing Like a Girl’ and Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
