Anderson, S. (2002) `Civilizing Children — Children's Sport and Civil Sociality in Copenhagen, Denmark', Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Copenhagen, Institute ofAnthropology.
2.
Bangsbøll S., A. Pinborg, C. Yding and A. Andersen (2004) `Patients' Attitudes towards Donation of Surplus Cryopreserved Embryos for Treatment or Research', Human Reproduction19(10): 2415—19.
3.
Carsten, J. (1997) The Heat of the Hearth: The Process of Kinship in a Malay Fishing Community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4.
Carsten, J. (2000) `Introduction: Cultures of Relatedness', pp. 1—36 in J. Carsten (ed.) Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study ofKinship . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Cussins, C.M. (1998) `Ontological Choreography: Agency for Women Patients in an Infertility Clinic', pp. 166—201 in M. Berg and A. Mol (eds) Differences in Medicine: Unraveling Practices, Techniques and Bodies. Durham, MD: Duke University Press.
6.
Despret, V. (2004) `The Body We Care for: Figures of Anthropo-zoo-genesis' , Body and Society10: 111—34.
7.
Edwards, J. (2000) Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8.
Edwards, J., S. Franklin, E. Hirsch, F. Price and M. Strathern (1993) Technologies of Procreation — Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.
9.
Fortes, M. (1945) The Dynamics of Clanship among the Tallensi. London: Oxford University Press.
10.
Franklin, S. (1997) Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge.
11.
Franklin, S. (2006) `Embryonic Economies: The Double Reproductive Value of Stem Cells', Bio-Societies1: 71—90.
12.
Franklin, S. and S. McKinnon (eds) (2001) Relative Values — Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. London: Duke University Press.
13.
Franklin, S. and H. Ragoné (eds) (1998) Reproducing Reproduction — Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
14.
Haimes, E. and J. Luce (2006) `Studying Potential Donors' Views on Embryonic Stem Cell Therapies and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis', Human Fertility9(2): 67—71.
15.
Hetherington, K. (2004) `Secondhandedness: Consumption, Disposal and Absent Presence', Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22: 157—73.
16.
Hoeyer, K. (2005) `Studying Ethics as Policy', Current Anthropology46: 71—90.
17.
Hoeyer, K. and N. Lynöe (2006) `Motivating Donors to Genetic Research? Anthropological Reasons to Rethink the Role of Informed Consent', Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy9: 13—23.
18.
Holge, L.F. (1996) `Transforming “Body Parts” into Therapeutic Tools: A Report from Germany', Medical Anthropology Quarterly10(4): 675—82.
19.
Horst, M. (2007) `Offentlighedens Laboratorium. Den Politiske Konstruktion af Stamcelleforskningens Legimitet' [The Laboratory of the Public. The Political Construction of the Legitimacy of Stem Cell Research], pp. 69—90 in L. Koch and K. Høyer (eds) Håbets Teknologi [The Technology of Hope]. Copenhagen: Munksgård.
20.
Irwin, A. (2001) `Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences', Public Understanding of Science10: 1—18.
21.
Irwin, A. (2006) `The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the “New” Scientific Governance', Social Studies of Science36(2): 299—320.
22.
Kaufman, S.R. and L.M. Morgan (2005) `The Anthropology of the Beginnings and Ends of Life', Annual Review of Anthropology34: 317—41.
23.
Koch, L. (2000) Tvangssterilation i Danmark 1929—67 [Compulsory Sterilization in Denmark 1929—67]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
24.
Konrad, M. (1998) `Ova Donation and Symbols of Substance: Some Variations on the Theme of Sex, Gender and the Partible Body', Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute12(1): 643—67.
25.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969) `The Principle of Reciprocity', pp. 52—68 in R. Needham (ed.) The Elementary Structures ofKinship. Oxford: Alden Press.
26.
Minstry of Internal Affairs (2003) Lov 209. Lov om Ændring af Kunstig Befrugtning i Forbindelse med Lægelig Behandling, Diagnostik og Forskning m.v. 209, stk. 5.1. [Act number 209 concerning Articifical Fertilization in Connection with Medical Treatment, Diagnosis, and Research] .
27.
Nettleton, S. (1998) `Governing the Risky Self: How to Become Healthy, Wealthy and Wise', pp. 207—22 in A. Petersen and R. Bunton (eds) Foucault, Health and Medicine. London: Routledge.
28.
Parry, S. (2006) `(Re)constructing Embryos in Stem Cell Research: Exploring the Meaning of Embryos for People Involved in Fertility Treatments' , Social Science and Medicine62: 2349—59.
29.
Plummer, K. (2001) `The Square of Intimate Citizenship: Some Preliminary Proposals', Citizenship Studies5(3): 237—53.
30.
Prainsack, B. (2006) `“Negotiating Life”: The Regulation of Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Human Cloning in Israel', Social Studies of Science36: 173—205.
31.
Price, F. (1996) `Now You See it, Now you Don't: Mediating Science and Managing Uncertainty in Reproductive Medicine', pp. 84—106 in A . Irwin and B. Wynne (eds) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Roberts, E. (2007) `Extra Embryos: The Ethics of Cryopreservation in Ecuador', American Ethnologist34: 181—99.
33.
Rose, N. (1999) Powers of Freedom — Reframing Political Thought . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Rose, N. and C. Novas (2005) `Biological Citizenship', pp. 439—63 in A. Ong and S.J. Collier (eds) Global Assemblages — Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford: Blackwell.
35.
Schmidt, L. (2006) `Infertility and Assisted Reproduction in Denmark: Epidemiology and Psychosocial Consequences'. Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Department of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen .
36.
Scully, J.L. and C. Rehmann-Sutter (2006) `Creating Donors: The 2005 Swiss Law on Donation of “Spare” Embryos to hESC Research', Bioethical Inquiry3: 81—93.
37.
Sperling, S. (2004) `From Crisis to Potentiality', Science and Public Policy31(2): 139—49.
38.
Strathern, M. (1992) After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Strathern, M. (2003) `Emergent Relations', pp. 165—94 in M. Biagiolo and P. Galison (eds) Scientific Authorship. New York: Routledge.
40.
Svendsen, G.T. and G.L.H. Svendsen (2006) Social Kapital — en Introduktion [Social Capital — An Introduction]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
41.
Svendsen, M.N. (2006) `The Social Life of Genetic Knowledge: A Case-Study of Choices and Dilemmas in Cancer Genetic Counselling in Denmark', Medical Anthropology25: 139—70.
42.
Svendsen, M.N. and L. Koch (2008) `Unpacking the “Spare” Embryo: Facilitating Stem Cell Research in a Moral Landscape', Social Studies of Science38(1): 95—112.
43.
Thompson, C. (2005) Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
44.
Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (2005) `Close Encounters with Infertility and Procreative Technology', pp. 71—91 in V. Steffen , R. Jenkins and H. Jessen (eds) Managing Uncertainty — Ethnographic Studies of Illness, Risk and the Struggle for Control. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.
45.
Turner, B.S. (1993) `Contemporary Problems in the Theory of Citizenship', pp. 1—18 in B.S. Turner (ed.) Citizenship and Social Theory. London: Sage.
46.
Waldby, C. and R. Mitchel (2006) `Introduction', pp. 1—30 in C. Waldby and R. MitchelTissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in the Late Capitalism. London: Duke University Press.