This study explores the impact of tourists’ viewing frequency of travel reality shows on willingness to travel through cultivation theory and uses & gratification theory, along with a pilot study and three scenario-based experiments. Results indicate that viewers with high (vs. low) viewing frequency of travel reality shows evoke greater willingness to travel, further testing the serial mediating effect between destination image and perceived destination attractiveness. Additionally, this study reveals the moderating role of tourists’ likability of travel reality shows. The findings not only broaden the application of these theories in travel reality show-induced tourism but also provide practical insights for destination marketers.
AgapitoDOom do VallePda Costa MendesJ (2013) The cognitive-affective-conative model of destination image: a confirmatory analysis. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing30(5): 471–481.
2.
AkamaJSKietiDM (2003) Measuring tourist satisfaction with Kenya’s wildlife safari: a case study of Tsavo West National Park. Tourism Management24(1): 73–81.
3.
AkarsuTNForoudiPMelewarTC (2020) What makes Airbnb likeable? Exploring the nexus between service attractiveness, country image, perceived authenticity and experience from a social exchange theory perspective within an emerging economy context. International Journal of Hospitality Management91: 102635.
4.
AndersenOØianHAasØ, et al. (2018) Affective and cognitive dimensions of ski destination images. The case of Norway and the Lillehammer region. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism18(2): 113–131.
5.
BalliFBalliHOCebeciK (2013) Impacts of exported Turkish soap operas and visa-free entry on inbound tourism to Turkey. Tourism Management37: 186–192.
6.
BartonKM (2009) Reality television programming and diverging gratifications: the influence of content on gratifications obtained. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media53(3): 460–476.
BiYYinJKimI (2021) Fostering a young audience’s media-induced travel intentions: the role of parasocial interactions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management47: 398–407.
9.
BreitsohlJGarrodB (2016) Assessing tourists’ cognitive, emotional and behavioural reactions to an unethical destination incident. Tourism Management54: 209–220.
10.
BrislinRW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology1(3): 185–216.
11.
ChaeJ (2019) YouTube makeup tutorials reinforce postfeminist beliefs through social comparison. Media Psychology24(2): 167–189.
12.
ChenZXShiYDongDH (2008) An empirical study of relationship quality in a service setting: a Chinese case. Marketing Intelligence & Planning26(1): 11–25.
13.
ChengJWMitomoHOtsukaT, et al. (2016) Cultivation effects of mass and social media on perceptions and behavioural intentions in post-disaster recovery – the case of the 2011 Great East Japan earthquake. Telematics and Informatics33(3): 753–772.
14.
CromptonJL (1979) Motivations for pleasure vacation. Annals of Tourism Research6(4): 408–424.
15.
De NiscoAMainolfiGMarinoV, et al. (2015) Tourism satisfaction effect on general country image, destination image, and post-visit intentions. Journal of Vacation Marketing21(4): 305–317.
16.
FlayelleMMauragePBillieuxJ (2017) Toward a qualitative understanding of binge-watching behaviors: a focus group approach. Journal of Behavioral Addictions6(4): 457–471.
GablerCBMyles LandersVReynoldsKE (2017) Purchase decision regret: negative consequences of the steadily increasing discount strategy. Journal of Business Research76: 201–208.
GerbnerG (2002) Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In: Media effects. Routledge, pp.53-78.
21.
GerbnerGGrossL (1976) Living with television: the violence profile. Journal of Communication26(2): 172–194.
22.
HallA (2006) Viewers’ perceptions of reality programs. Communication Quarterly54(2): 191–211.
23.
HaneforsMMossbergL (2002) TV travel shows — A pre-taste of the destination. Journal of Vacation Marketing8(3): 235–246.
24.
HaoXXuSZhangX (2019) Barrage participation and feedback in travel reality shows: the effects of media on destination image among generation Y. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management12: 27–36.
25.
HawkinsIColesSMSaleemM, et al. (2022) How reel middle Easterners’ portrayals cultivate stereotypical beliefs and policy support. Mass Communication and Society27(1): 1–25.
26.
HermannEMorganMShanahanJ (2021) Television, continuity, and change: a meta-analysis of five decades of cultivation research. Journal of Communication71(4): 515–544.
27.
HuYRitchieJRB (1993) Measuring destination attractiveness: a contextual approach. Journal of Travel Research32(2): 25–34.
28.
HudsonSWangYGilSM (2011) The influence of a film on destination image and the desire to travel: a cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Tourism Research13(2): 177–190.
29.
KangSEKooCChungN (2023) Creepy vs. cool: switching from human staff to service robots in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management111: 103479.
30.
KatzEBlumlerJGGurevitchM (1974) Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In: The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research, pp.19-32.
31.
KimBKKimKO (2020) Relationship between viewing motivation, presence, viewing satisfaction, and attitude toward tourism destinations based on TV travel reality variety programs. Sustainability12(11): 4614.
32.
KimDPerdueRR (2011) The influence of image on destination attractiveness. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing28(3): 225–239.
33.
KimS (2012) Audience involvement and film tourism experiences: emotional places, emotional experiences. Tourism Management33(2): 387–396.
34.
KimSKimSHanH (2018) Effects of TV drama celebrities on national image and behavioral intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research24(3): 233–249.
35.
KimSELeeKYShinSI, et al. (2017) Effects of tourism information quality in social media on destination image formation: the case of Sina Weibo. Information & Management54(6): 687–702.
36.
KuYCChuTHTsengCH (2013) Gratifications for using CMC technologies: a comparison among SNS, IM, and e-mail. Computers in Human Behavior29(1): 226–234.
37.
KubotaYCushmanMZakaiN, et al. (2018) TV viewing and incident venous thromboembolism: the atherosclerotic risk in communities study. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis45(3): 353–359.
38.
KühneROpreeSJ (2020) From admiration to devotion? The longitudinal relation between Adolescents’ involvement with and viewing frequency of reality TV. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media64(2): 111–130.
39.
LedbetterAM (2009) Patterns of media use and multiplexity: associations with sex, geographic distance and friendship interdependence. New Media & Society11(7): 1187–1208.
40.
LedbetterAMTaylorSHMazerJP (2016) Enjoyment fosters media use frequency and determines its relational outcomes: toward a synthesis of uses and gratifications theory and media multiplexity theory. Computers in Human Behavior54: 149–157.
41.
LeeBHamSKimD (2015) The effects of likability of Korean celebrities, dramas, and music on preferences for Korean restaurants: a mediating effect of a country image of Korea. International Journal of Hospitality Management46: 200–212.
42.
LiLZhangJNianS, et al. (2017) Tourists’ perceptions of crowding, attractiveness, and satisfaction: a second-order structural model. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research22(12): 1250–1260.
43.
LiTChenY (2017) The destructive power of money and vanity in deviant tourist behavior. Tourism Management61: 152–160.
44.
LinCAXuZ (2017) Watching TV series with horror content: audience attributes, motivations, involvement and enjoyment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media61(4): 638–657.
45.
LiouDY (2010) Beyond Tokyo rainbow bridge: destination images portrayed in Japanese drama affect Taiwanese tourists’ perception. Journal of Vacation Marketing16(1): 5–15.
46.
McGuireWJ (1985) Chapter attitudes and attitude change. In: Handbook of social psychology. pp.233-346.
47.
MorrisonAMBatabyalDRawalYS, et al. (2024) The effects of Bollywood film-induced tour guiding on revisit intentions and destination image. Journal of Vacation Marketing: 13567667241293793. doi:10.1177/13567667241293793
48.
MurraySOuelletteL (2004) Reality TV: Remaking television culture. New York: New York University Press.
49.
NabiRL (2007) Determining dimensions of reality: a concept mapping of the reality TV landscape. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media51(2): 371–390.
50.
NabiRLBielyENMorganSJ, et al. (2003) Reality-based television programming and the psychology of its appeal. Media Psychology5(4): 303–330.
51.
NguyenBMelewarTCChenJ (2013) A framework of brand likeability: an exploratory study of likeability in firm-level brands. Journal of Strategic Marketing21(4): 368–390.
52.
PanWMuZTangZ (2022) Social media influencer viewing and intentions to change appearance: a large scale cross-sectional survey on female social Media users in China. Frontiers in Psychology13: 846390.
53.
PapadimitriouDKaplanidouKApostolopoulouA (2018) Destination image components and word-of-mouth intentions in urban tourism: a multigroup approach. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research42(4): 503–527.
54.
PatinoAKaltchevaVDSmithMF (2011) The appeal of reality television for teen and pre-teen audiences. Journal of Advertising Research51(1): 288–297.
55.
PetersMSchuckertMChonK, et al. (2011) Empire and romance: movie-induced tourism and the case of the Sissi movies. Tourism Recreation Research36(2): 169–180.
56.
QiuLYeoSLiX, et al. (2024) Enhancing brand equity in popular culture tourism: testing the role of fandom in a serial mediation model. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research29(8): 922–941.
57.
QuYKhanJSuY, et al. (2023) Impulse buying tendency in live-stream commerce: the role of viewing frequency and anticipated emotions influencing scarcity-induced purchase decision. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services75: 103534.
58.
RoseRLWoodSL (2005) Paradox and the consumption of authenticity through reality television. Journal of Consumer Research32(2): 284–296.
59.
RyanCYanningZHuiminG, et al. (2009) Grand view gardens, Beijing: tourism, a classic novel and television. Journal of Travel Research48(1): 14–28.
60.
SharmaSStylidisDWoosnamKM (2022) From virtual to actual destinations: do interactions with others, emotional solidarity, and destination image in online games influence willingness to travel?Current Issues in Tourism26(9): 1427–1445.
61.
SnepengerDKingJMarshallE, et al. (2006) Modeling Iso-Ahola’s motivation theory in the tourism context. Journal of Travel Research45(2): 140–149.
62.
SongMLiuCWangY, et al. (2024) Does extremes lead to opposites? The influence mechanism of specific ambivalent emotions on tourists’ travel intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research29(10): 1286–1307.
63.
SuLChenHHuangY, et al. (2023) In-group favoritism or black sheep effect? The moderating role of norm strength on destination residents’ responses towards deviant behaviors. Tourism Management98: 104773.
64.
SunYShaoXLiX, et al. (2019) How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: an IT affordance perspective. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications37: 100886.
65.
TengHYChenCY (2020) Enhancing celebrity fan-destination relationship in film-induced tourism: the effect of authenticity. Tourism Management Perspectives33: 100605.
66.
VandenboschLEggermontS (2011) Temptation island, the bachelor, Joe Millionaire: a prospective cohort study on the role of romantically themed reality television in Adolescents’ sexual development. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media55(4): 563–580.
67.
WangCYHsuMK (2010) The relationships of destination image, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions: an integrated model. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing27(8): 829–843.
68.
WilsonCRobinsonTCallisterM (2012) Surviving survivor: a content analysis of antisocial behavior and its context in a popular reality television show. Mass Communication and Society15(2): 261–283.
69.
WindermanKSmithNG (2018) Minority stress and LGB-inclusive television viewing frequency among LGB adults: the roles of community connectedness and perceived social support. Mass Communication and Society22(2): 248–269.
70.
WonnebergerASchoenbachKvan MeursL (2009) Dynamics of individual television viewing behavior: models, empirical evidence, and a research program. Communication Studies60(3): 235–252.
71.
WoosnamKMStylidisDIvkovM (2020) Explaining conative destination image through cognitive and affective destination image and emotional solidarity with residents. Journal of Sustainable Tourism28(6): 917–935.
72.
WuGLiangL (2021) Examining the effect of potential tourists’ wine product involvement on wine tourism destination image and travel intention. Current Issues in Tourism24(16): 2278–2293.
73.
XuDGuoL (2017) Use and gratifications of singing competition reality shows: linking narcissism and gratifications sought with the multimedia viewing of Chinese audiences. Mass Communication and Society21(2): 198–224.
74.
XuZZhangJ (2016) Antecedents and consequences of place attachment: a comparison of Chinese and western urban tourists in Hangzhou, China. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management5(2): 86–96.
75.
YuanSBesleyJCMaW (2018) Be mean or be nice? Understanding the effects of aggressive and polite communication styles in child vaccination debate. Health Communication34(10): 1212–1221.
76.
ZhangMLiJLiX (2025a) Can esports help with hospitality marketing for generation Z? The interaction of esports, novelty seeking, and subjective knowledge. International Journal of Hospitality Management124: 103963.
77.
ZhangMLiXLiJ (2025b) Cyclical or linear? Matching strategies of temporal perspective and anthropomorphic language in shaping heritage preservation commitment. Journal of Sustainable Tourism: 1–31. doi:10.1080/09669582.2025.2588375.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
