This study explores how individual and collective value are dynamically created within independent travel groups (ITGs) in Lijiang, China. Drawing on field research and grounded in Service-Dominant logic, social practice theory, and Pre-Qin Confucian philosophy, we identify two interwoven value creation pathways: “We value co-creation” and “I value creation.” Conceptualized as micro-ecosystems, ITGs are examined through a four-element practice framework comprising autonomy-connection meaning orientations, dual-layer competences, hybrid service systems, and multi-level institutions, which explains how autonomy and group cohesion are continually negotiated within travel groups. The hybrid service systems function as “the third smart companion,” facilitating value realization and group coordination. Culturally, the Pre-Qin Confucian principle “harmony without uniformity” offers a lens to reinterpret co-creation beyond the collectivism–individualism dichotomy. This research advances theoretical understanding of group travel and offers actionable insights for destination governance, service design, and digital mediation in tourism contexts.
AaltonenAAlaimoCKallinikosJ (2021) The making of data commodities: data analytics as an embedded process. Journal of Management Information Systems38(2): 401–429.
2.
AjmalMMJanAKhanM, et al. (2024) Exploring the barriers and motivators of value co-creation through a theoretical lens of service-dominant logic. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing39(6): 1174–1191.
3.
AkakaMAVargoSLNariswariA, et al. (2023) Microfoundations for macromarketing: a metatheoretical lens for bridging the micro-macro divide. Journal of Macromarketing43(1): 61–75.
4.
ArgyleMFurnhamAGrahamJA (1981) Social Situations. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BargemanBRichardsG (2020) A new approach to understanding tourism practices. Annals of Tourism Research84: 102988.
6.
BourdieuP (2020) Outline of a theory of practice. In: The new Social Theory Reader. London, England: Routledge, 80–86.
7.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
8.
ByelikovaMBezkhlibnaAPolyezhayevY, et al. (2024) Informational and digital business security in tourism as a component of the coastal region competitiveness. In: Data-Centric Business and Applications: Modern Trends in Financial and Innovation Data Processes 2023. Volume 1. Cham: Springer, 117–145.
9.
CamattiNWallingtonS (2023) Co-creation and internal place branding: a case study of Plettenberg Bay, South Africa. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy19(4): 525–534.
10.
CarvalhoMKastenholzECarneiroMJ (2023) Co-creative tourism experiences–a conceptual framework and its application to food & wine tourism. Tourism Recreation Research48(5): 668–692.
11.
ChenY-SWuS-T (2021) An exploration of actor-network theory and social affordance for the development of a tourist attraction: a case study of a Jimmy-related theme park, Taiwan. Tourism Management82: 104206.
12.
ChengJHeXWenJ, et al. (2024) How does spatial distance to travel companions transform to temporal distance in travel purchase decisions?Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management60: 166–176.
13.
ClandininDJ (2006) Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
ClandininDJ (2022) Engaging in Narrative Inquiry. London, England: Routledge.
15.
ClandininDJRosiekJ (2019) Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry: Borderland spaces and tensions. In: Journeys in Narrative Inquiry. London, England: Routledge, 228–264.
16.
CohenE (1972) Toward a sociology of international tourism. Social Research Apr(1): 164–182.
17.
DickingerAKolomoyetsY (2024) Value co-creation in tourism living labs. Journal of Business Research183: 114820.
18.
EdelmannNRodriguez MüllerAPSteenT, et al. (2022) Sustainable Co-Creation in the Public Sector: A Case Study in the Lower Austrian Federal Government. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance.
19.
FardousJDuJTHansenP, et al. (2021) Group trip planning and information seeking behaviours by mobile social media users: a study of tourists in Australia, Bangladesh and China. Journal of Information Science47(3): 323–339.
20.
FolgerJPPooleMSStutmanRK (2024) Working Through Conflict: Strategies for Relationships, Groups, and Organizations. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
FontXEnglishRGkritzaliA, et al. (2021) Value co-creation in sustainable tourism: a service-dominant logic approach. Tourism Management82: 104200.
22.
FuXLiuXLiH, et al. (2022) Creating a balanced family travel experience: a perspective from the motivation-activities-transformative learning chain. Tourism Management Perspectives41: 100941.
23.
GarantiZ (2023) Value co-creation in smart tourism destinations. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes15(5): 468–475.
24.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press.
25.
GrönroosC (2011) Value co-creation in service logic: a critical analysis. Marketing Theory11(3): 279–301.
26.
GuoJJiangYLinS, et al. (2025) Individualism and collectivism as predictors of creative potentials and real-life creativity in China and US. Creativity Research Journal37(1): 120–131.
27.
HeinonenKStrandvikTVoimaP (2013) Customer dominant value formation in service. European Business Review 25(2): 104–123.
28.
HofstedeG (2011) Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture2(1): 8.
29.
HuangHRuanW-QLiY-Q, et al. (2023) Can companions share anxiety? The effect of travel companions on tourist anxiety during crisis situations. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research28(9): 1000–1018.
30.
HuangMLiXXiaJ, et al. (2024) Does Confucianism prompt firms to participate in poverty alleviation campaigns?Journal of Business Ethics189(4): 743–762.
31.
HuibinXMarzukiARazakAA (2012) Protective development of cultural heritage tourism: the case of Lijiang, China. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management7(1): 39–54.
32.
KargarMLinZ (2021) A socially motivating and environmentally friendly tour recommendation framework for tourist groups. Expert Systems with Applications180: 115083.
33.
KimK-W (2023) Wayfinding satisfaction on tourist revisit intention: a moderated moderation model of travel group size and tourism information service. Journal of International Trade & Commerce19(1): 37–49.
34.
KongSGuoJHuangD (2022) The girlfriend getaway as an intimacy. Annals of Tourism Research92: 103337.
35.
KraffHJernsandEM (2024) Political and relational co-creation for inclusive tourism development. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 24(2): 1–14.
36.
LeeSOKimJHanH (2023) Family tourism development in the new era of tourism: Korean tourists’ domestic trip preferences for accommodation, travel duration, destination, and natural environment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10(1): 1–10.
37.
LiJKunasekaranPChiaKW, et al. (2023) A systematic mapping study on tourist-tourist interactions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management56: 163–185.
38.
LiMLinGFengX (2023) An interactive family tourism decision model. Journal of Travel Research62(1): 121–134.
39.
LiZZYangYZhangX (2024) Family travel as an educational experience: revealing multi-level Parents’ perceived value through a family systems approach. Tourism Management Perspectives53: 101301.
40.
LiaoZZhengWLinZ (2022) Time apart while together: a smart trip design for group travelers. Annals of Tourism Research93: 103374.
41.
LinkeSWaijittragumP (2023) Research on user experience interface design of Lijiang tourism APP. In: INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH CONFERENCE IN OXFORD 2023.
42.
Lorenzo-RomeroCdel-Pozo-RuizLMondéjar-JiménezJ-A, et al. (2024) The importance of co-creation experience: online accommodation platforms. Current Issues in Tourism27(22): 3715–3731.
43.
MahadevanRZhangJ (2022) Tourism in UNESCO world heritage site: divergent visitor views to lijiang on experiences, satisfaction and future intentions. Journal of China Tourism Research18(3): 670–688.
44.
MathisEFKimHLUysalM, et al. (2016) The effect of co-creation experience on outcome variable. Annals of Tourism Research57: 62–75.
45.
MaziliauskeE (2024) Innovation for sustainability through co-creation by small and medium-sized tourism enterprises (SMEs): socio-cultural sustainability benefits to rural destinations. Tourism Management Perspectives50: 101201.
46.
McCartneyGChenY (2020) Co-creation tourism in an ancient Chinese town. Journal of China Tourism Research16(2): 159–182.
47.
MirehieMGibsonHJBuningRJ, et al. (2021) Towards an understanding of family travel decision-making processes in the context of youth sport tourism. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management21: 100644.
48.
MohammadiFYazdaniHRPourMJ, et al. (2020) Co-creation in tourism: a systematic mapping study. Tourism Review 76(2): 305–343.
49.
MuraPSharifSP (2017) Narrative analysis in tourism: a critical review. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism17(2): 194–207.
50.
NaeemMOzuemWHowellK, et al. (2022) Understanding the process of meanings, materials, and competencies in adoption of mobile banking. Electronic Markets32(4): 2445–2469.
51.
NariswariAVargoSL (2024) Service-dominant logic: Theoretical foundations and directions. In: Humanism in Marketing: Responsible Leadership and the Human-to-Human Approach. Cham: Springer, 153–186.
52.
PayneAFStorbackaKFrowP (2008) Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science36: 83–96.
53.
PrahaladCKRamaswamyV (2004) Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing18(3): 5–14.
54.
ReckwitzA (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory5(2): 243–263.
55.
ReichenbergerI (2017) C2c value co-creation through social interactions in tourism. International Journal of Tourism Research19(6): 629–638.
56.
RihovaIBuhalisDGouthroMB, et al. (2018) Customer-to-customer co-creation practices in tourism: lessons from customer-dominant logic. Tourism Management67: 362–375.
57.
SaundersMNLewisPThornhillA (2023) Research Methods for Business Students-9e.
58.
SchatzkiT (2001) Introduction: practice theory. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (Vol. 44). London, England: Routledge, 10–23.
59.
ShanTTianX (2022) Gentlemen seek harmony but not uniformity: the heterogeneity of entrepreneurial team and organizational resilience. Frontiers in Psychology13: 948708.
60.
ShoveEPantzarMWatsonM (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. London, England: Sage.
61.
SongHSongX (2024) The effect of heritage tourism interpretation media type on tourists’ eWOM: the moderating role of travel group size. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 33(10): 1–21.
62.
SongHWangYSparksBA (2018) How do young Chinese friendship groups make travel decisions? A content and interaction process analysis. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing35(6): 772–785.
63.
SuLChengJHuangY (2021) How do group size and group familiarity influence tourist satisfaction? The mediating role of perceived value. Journal of Travel Research60(8): 1821–1840.
64.
SuXZhangHCaiX (2021) Lifestyle, profit, and the selling of home to tourists in Lijiang, China. Tourism Geographies23(5–6): 1001–1020.
65.
TrentmannF (2016) Empire of Things: How We became a World of Consumers, from the Fifteenth Century to the Twenty-First. London, England: Penguin UK.
66.
TriandisHC (2018) Individualism and Collectivism. New York, NY: Routledge.
67.
VargoSLFehrerJAWielandH, et al. (2024) The nature and fundamental elements of digital service innovation. Journal of Service Management35(2): 227–252.
68.
VargoSLLuschRF (2008) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science36: 1–10.
69.
VargoSLLuschRF (2014) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. In: The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing. New York, NY: Routledge, 3–28.
70.
VargoSLLuschRF (2016) Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science44: 5–23.
71.
VargoSLMaglioPPAkakaMA (2008) On value and value co-creation: a service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal26(3): 145–152.
72.
VerleyeK (2015) The co-creation experience from the customer perspective: its measurement and determinants. Journal of Service Management26(2): 321–342.
73.
WangSYoonTH (2025) Beyond the challenges: exploring the influence of travel constraints on family travel dynamics with young children. International Journal of Tourism Research27(2): e70009.
74.
WangZ-HLiuX-W (2025) Research on the application of single-parent genetic algorithm improved by sine chaotic mapping in parent–child travel path optimization. Electronics14(9): 1894.
75.
WuWWuM-YYiL, et al. (2021) Measuring Chinese adolescents’ learning outcomes in family travel: a scale development approach. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management20: 100617.
YangECL (2021) What motivates and hinders people from travelling alone? A study of solo and non-solo travellers. Current Issues in Tourism24(17): 2458–2471.
78.
YangMJHKhoo-LattimoreCYangECL (2020) Three generations on a holiday: exploring the influence of neo-Confucian values on Korean multigenerational family vacation decision making. Tourism Management78: 104076.
79.
YinYGaoJPanY (2024) What impacts Tourists’ co-creation experiences in smart tourism destinations? A mixed methods research from four Chinese smart tourism destinations. Tourism and Hospitality5(4): 1327–1343.
80.
ZengZChenP-JXiaoX, et al. (2022) The mediating and moderating effects on the intention to use navigation apps. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology13(5): 972–991.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
