Although motivations, constraints, and negotiation strategies influence travel decision-making, few studies have explored them together in a holistic way. This article explored these factors through testing the constraint-effects-mitigation (CEM) model in the tourism context of international university students’ travel. A questionnaire was administered to 373 international university students studying in Australia. The CEM model was only partially supported. Intrapersonal constraints had a stronger influence on travel intention than interpersonal and structural constraints. Behavioral negotiation strategies had a stronger effect on intention than cognitive strategies. Negotiation only partially mediated the relationship between constraints and intention. Practical implications and future research recommendations are also outlined.
AdamIHiameySE,AfenyoEA (2015) Leisure constraints in the university setting in Ghana. Annals of Leisure Research18(1): 145–158.
2.
AlexandrisKTsorbatzoudisC,GrouiosG (2002) Perceived constraints on recreational sport participation: investigating their relationship with intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation. Journal of Leisure Research34(3): 233–252.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) Australian social trends December 2011. Available at: www.abs.gov.au/socialtrends. (accessed 13 September 2017).
BaronRMKennyDA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173–1182.
7.
BialeschikiMD (2005) Fear of violence: contested constraints by women in outdoor recreation activities. In: JacksonEL (ed) Constraints to Leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, pp. 103–114.
8.
BicikovaK (2014) Understanding student travel behavior: a segmentation analysis of British university students. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing31(7): 854–867.
9.
BizirigianniIDionysopoulouP (2013) The influence of tourist trends of youth tourism through social media (SM) & information and communication technologies (ICTs)Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences73(27): 652–660.
10.
CanallyCTimothyDJ (2007) Perceived constraints to travel across the US–Mexico border among American university students. International Journal of Tourism Research9: 423–437.
11.
CarrN (2003) A comparative analysis of the behavior of domestic and international young tourists. Tourism Management23(3): 321–32
12.
ChaSMcClearyKWUysalM (1995) Travel motivations of Japanese overseas travellers: A Factor-Cluster segmentation approach. Journal of Travel Research34(1): 33–39.
13.
CorreiaAOom do VallePMoçoC (2007) Modeling motivations and perceptions of Portuguese tourists. Journal of Business Research60(1): 76–80.
14.
CovelliEAGraefeAR,BurnsRC (2007) A re-examination of constraint negotiation models for forest recreation. In: SchneiderEMcCormickBP (eds) 2007 Leisure Research Symposium. Ashburn, VA: National Recreation and Park Association, pp. 5–8.
15.
CrawfordDWGodbeyG (1987) Conceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure Sciences9(2): 119–127.
16.
CrawfordDWJacksonEL,GodbeyG (1991) A hierarchical model of leisure constraint. Leisure Sciences13: 309–320.
17.
CromptonJL (1979) Motivations for pleasure vacation. Annals of Tourism Research6(4): 408–424.
18.
CromptonJLJacksonEL,WittP (2005) Integrating benefits to leisure with constraints to leisure. In JacksonEL (ed) Constraints to Leisure. State College, PA: Venture Publishing, pp. 245–260.
19.
DannGMS (1981) Tourist motivation: an appraisal. Annals of Tourism Research8(2): 187–219.
20.
DengRRitchieBW (2016) International university students’ travel risk perceptions: an exploratory study. Current Issues in Tourism1–22.
21.
FedlerAJDittonRB (2001) Dropping out and dropping in: a study of factors for changing recreational fishing participation. North American Journal of Fisheries Management21: 283–292.
22.
FieldA (2009) Discovering Statistics with SPSS. London: Sage.
23.
GardinerSKingB,WilkinsH (2013) The travel behaviors of international students: nationality-based constraints and opportunities. Journal of Vacation Marketing19(4): 287–299.
24.
GloverP (2011) A comparison between domestic and international students’ trip characteristics: evidence from an Australian university. Journal of Vacation Marketing17(4): 263–274.
25.
GohERitchieB (2011) Using the theory of planned behavior to understand student attitudes and constraints toward attending field trips. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism11(2): 179–194.
26.
HairJBlackWCBabinBJAndersonRE (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). London: Pearson.
27.
HendersonKABialeschkiMD (1993) Exploring an expanded model of women’s leisure constraints. Journal of Applied Recreation Research18: 229–252.
28.
HillR (1998) What sample size is ‘enough’ in internet survey research?Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal of the 21st century6: 3–4.
HuangRTianX (2013) An investigation of travel behavior of Chinese international students in the UK. Journal of China Tourism Research9(3): 277–291.
31.
HubbardJMannellR (2001) Testing competing models of the leisure constraint and negotiation process in a corporate employee recreation setting. Leisure Sciences23: 145–163.
32.
HughesKWangJ,ShuM (2015) Exploring the travel patterns, preferences and recommendations for Chinese university students living in Australia. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management23: 12–22.
33.
HungKPetrickJF (2012) Comparing constraints to cruising between cruisers and non-cruisers: a test of the constraint-effects-mitigation model. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing29(3): 242–262.
34.
IsaacSMichaelWB (1995) Handbook in Research and Evaluation. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
35.
JacksonEL (1990) Variations in the desire to begin a leisure activity: Evidence of antecedent constraints?Journal of Leisure Research22(1): 55–70.
36.
JacksonEL (2005) Leisure constraints research: overview of a developing theme in leisure studies. In: JacksonEL (ed) Constraints to Leisure. State College, PA: Venture, pp. 3–19.
37.
JacksonELRucksVC (1995) Negotiation of leisure constraints by junior-high and high-school students: an exploratory study. Journal of Leisure Research27(1): 85–105.
38.
JacksonELScottD (1999) Constraints to leisure. In: JacksonELBurtonTL (eds) Leisure Studies: Prospects for the Twenty-First Century. State College, PA: Venture, pp. 299–321.
39.
JacksonELSearleMS (1985) Recreation non-participation and barriers to participation: concepts and models. Loisir et Société8: 693–707.
40.
JacksonELCrawfordDW,GodbeyG (1993) Negotiation of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences15: 1–11.
41.
JamesLRBrettJM (1984) Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology69: 307–321.
42.
JengJFesenmaierD (2002) Conceptualizing the travel decision making hierarchy: a review of recent developments. Tourism Analysis7: 15–32.
43.
JolliffeIT (1986) Principal Component Analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
44.
JuddCMKennyDA (1981) Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluation. Evaluation Review5: 602–619.
45.
KayTJacksonG (1991) Leisure despite constraint: the impact of leisure constraints on leisure participation. Journal of Leisure Research23(4): 301–313.
46.
KhuongMNHaHTT (2014) The influences of push and pull factors on the international leisure tourists’ return intention to Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam – a mediation analysis of destination satisfaction. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance5(6): 490–496.
47.
KimK (2006) Travel decisions of students at a US university: segmenting the international market. Journal of Vacation Marketing12(4): 345–357.
48.
KimKYJogaratnamG (2003) Travel motivations. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing13(4): 61–82.
49.
KimKNohJ,JogaratnamG (2006) Multi-destination segmentation based on push and pull motives: pleasure trips of students at a US university. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing21(3): 19–32.
50.
KimKOhIJogaratnamG (2007) College student travel: A revised model of push motives. Journal of Vacation Marketing13(1): 73–85.
51.
KlenoskyD (2002) The ‘pull’ of tourism destinations: a means-end investigation. Journal of Travel Research40(4): 385–395.
LeeSScottD (2009) The process of celebrity fan’s constraint negotiation. Journal of Leisure Research41(2): 137–155.
54.
LittleDE (2002) Women and adventure recreation: reconstructing leisure constraints and adventure experiences to negotiate continuing participation. Journal of Leisure Research34(2): 157–177.
55.
Loucks-AtkinsonAMannellRC (2007) Role of self-efficacy in the constraints negotiation process: the case of individuals with fibromyalgia syndrome. Leisure Sciences29(1): 19–36.
LyuSOOhCO (2014) Recreationists’ constraints negotiation process for continual leisure engagement. Leisure Sciences36(5): 479–497.
58.
MannellRIso-AholaS (1987) Psychological nature of leisure and tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research14: 314–331.
59.
MannellRCKleiberDA (1997) A Social Psychology of Leisure. State College, PA: Venture.
60.
MannellRCLoucks-AtkinsonA (2005) Why don’t people do what’s ‘good’ for them? Cross-fertilization among the psychologies of nonparticipation in leisure, health and exercise behaviors. In: JacksonEL (ed) Constraints to Leisure. State College, PA: Venture, pp. 221–232.
61.
McCabeAS (2000) Tourism motivation process. Annals of Tourism Research27(4): 1049–1052.
62.
Min-EnAT (2006) Travel stimulated by international students in Australia. International Journal of Travel Research8: 451–468.
63.
NadirovaAJacksonEL (2000) Alternative criterion variables against which to assess the impacts of constraints to leisure. Journal of Leisure Research32(4): 396–405.
64.
NunnallyJCBernsteinIH (1994) Psychometric Theory. New Delhi: Tata/McGraw-Hill.
65.
NyaupaneGPAndereckK (2008) Understanding travel constraints: application and extension of a leisure constraints model. Journal of Travel Research46(4): 433–439.
66.
PayneK (2009) International Students as Domestic Tourists in New Zealand: A Study of Travel Patterns, Behaviors, Motivations and Expenditure. New South Wales: Southern Cross University.
67.
PizamANeumannY,ReichelA (1979) Tourist satisfaction. Annals of Tourism Research6(2): 195–197.
68.
PlangmarnAMujtabaBG,PiraniM (2012) Cultural value and travel motivation of European tourists. Journal of Applied Business Research28(6): 1295–1304.
69.
PrebensenNVittersoJ,DahlT (2013) Value co-creation significance of tourist resources. Annals of Tourism Research42: 240–261.
70.
RaymoreLGodbeyGCrawfordD. (1993) Nature and process of leisure constraints: an empirical test. Leisure Sciences15(2): 99–113.
71.
RichardsGWilsonJ (2004) The international student travel market: travelstyle, motivations and activities. Tourism Review International8(2): 57–67.
72.
RihovaIBuhalisDMoitalM. (2015) Conceptualising customer-to-customer value co-creation in tourism. International Journal of Tourism Research17: 356–363.
73.
SangpikulA (2008) Travel motivations of Japanese senior travelers to Thailand. International Journal of Tourism Research10(1): 81–94.
74.
SchroederSAFultonDCLawrenceJS. (2012) An application and extension of the constraints-effects-mitigation model to Minnesota waterfowl hunting. Human Dimensions of Wildlife17(3): 174–192.
75.
ScottD (1991) The problematic nature of participation in contract bridge: a qualitative study of group-related constraints. Leisure Sciences13(4): 321–336.
76.
ShiYXNakataniTSajikiT. (2010) Travel behavior of international students at a university in Japan: a comparison of Chinese and non-Chinese students. Journal of China Tourism Research6(1): 61–72.
77.
SonJMowenA,KerstetterD (2008) Testing alternative leisure constraint negotiation model: an extension of Hubbard and Mannell’s study. Leisure Sciences30: 198–216.
78.
SchneiderIEWilhelmStanis SA (2007) Coping: An alternative conceptualization for constraint negotiation and accommodation. Leisure Sciences29(4): 391–401.
79.
StanisSAWSchneiderIERussellKC (2009) Leisure time physical activity of park visitors: retesting constraint models in adoption and maintenance stages. Leisure Sciences31(3): 287–304.
80.
TaylorRShankaT,PopeJ (2004) Investigating the significance of VFR visits to international students. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education14: 61–77.
ThamMEA (2006) Travel stimulated by international students in Australia. International Journal of Tourism Research8: 451–468.
84.
UysalMJurowskiC (1994) Testing the push and pull factors. Annals of Tourism Research21(4): 844–846.
85.
Van BelleG (2002) Statistical Rules of Thumb. New York: John Wiley.
86.
VarastehHMarzukiA,RasoolimaneshSM (2015) Factors affecting international students’ travel behavior. Journal of Vacation Marketing21(2): 131–149.
87.
VealAJ (2006) Research Methods for Leisure and Tourism: A Practical Guide, 3rd ed. London: Prentice Hall.
88.
WangXWalkerGJ (2010) A comparison of Canadian and Chinese university students’ travel motivations. Leisure/Loisir34(3): 279–293.
89.
WeaverDB (2003) The contribution of international students to tourism beyond the core educational experience: evidence from Australia. Tourism Review International7(2): 95–105.
90.
WhiteDD (2008) A structural model of leisure constraints negotiation in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences30(4): 342–359.
YoonYUysalM (2005) An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty: a structural model. Tourism Management26(1): 45–56.
93.
ZendgBGerritsenR (2014) What do we know about social media in tourism? A review. Tourism Management Perspectives10: 27–36.
