The Debates, Notes and Queries section provides an opportunity for evaluation-related issues to be debated as well as for more genera! interchange. Debates can take the form of sustained arguments by the advocates of different approaches or of briefer thoughts or notes. Contributors may also wish to comment and raise questions about material that has previously appeared in the journal or simply use the section to draw readers' attention to relevant issues, ongoing research, evaluation activities and other events.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CSF Evaluation Unit (1998) Review of Ongoing Evaluation Function in the Community Support Framework (CSF) for Ireland. Dublin: Department of Finance.
2.
Derlien, Hans-Ulrich (1990) 'Genesis and Structure of Evaluation Efforts in Comparative Perspective', in R. C. Rist (ed.) Program Evaluation and the Management of Government, Patterns and Prospects across Eight Nations. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
3.
European Commission DG XVI (forthcoming) 'Evaluation Design and Management', in MEANS Collection: Evaluating Socio-Economic Programmes 1. Luxembourg: OOPEC.
4.
GAO (1998) Program Evaluation: Agencies Challenged by New Demand for Information Program Results. Washington, DC.
5.
Leeuw, Frans L. (1996) 'Performance Auditing, New Public Management and Performance Improvement: Questions and Answers', in Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal9(2): 92-102.
6.
Leeuw, Frans L. (1997) 'Evaluatie-Onderzoek en de Nederlandse Rijksdienst Anno 1997: Een Nabeschouwing', in A.Hendriks (ed.) Evaluatie-Onderzoek in de Rijksdienst, pp. 161-170. Den Haag: Ministerie van Financien.
7.
Leeuw, Frans L. and Piet J. Rozendal (1994) 'Policy Evaluation and the Netherlands' Government: Scope, Utilization and Organizational Learning', in Frans L. Leeuw, Ray C. Rist and Richard C. Sonnichsen (eds) Can Governments Learn: Comparative Perspectives on Evaluation and Organizational Learning, pp. 67-89. London: Transaction Books.
8.
MacKay, Keith (1998) 'Evaluation in the Australian Government', Paper, INTEVAL Working Group on Program and Policy Evaluation, Dublin, Annual Meeting, May 21-4.
9.
Paliokas, K. and Ray C. Rist (1998) 'The Rise and Fall (and Rise Again?) of the Evaluation Function in the US Government', Paper, INTEVAL Working Group on Program and Policy Evaluation, Dublin, Annual Meeting, May 21-4.
10.
Picciotto, Robert (1998) 'Why Bother About ECD?', in R. MacKay (ed.) Public Sector Performance: the Critical Role of Evaluation, pp. 17-21. Selected proceedings from a World Bank Seminar, Washington, DC.
11.
Power, Mike (1994) The Audit Explosion. London: Demos Publishers.
12.
Power, Mike (1995) 'Audit and the Decline of Inspection', Paper, Public Finance Foundation, London.
13.
Rossi, P. and J. D.Wright (1984) 'Evaluation Research: an Assessmefft', Annual Review of Sociology10: 331-352.
14.
Summa, Hillka and Jacques Toulemonde (1998) 'Evaluation in the European Union', Paper, INTEVAL Working Group on Program and Policy Evaluation, Dublin, Annual Meeting, May 21-4.
15.
Taylor, M. (1996) 'Between Public and Private: Accountability in Voluntary Organisations', Policy and Politics24(1): 57-72.
