This article probes the contrasting traditions of economics and evaluation and shows that intensified collaboration would benefit both professions. While evaluators have long been examining the impact of economic advice on public policy, economists have neglected evaluation both as a platform for testing economic policy hypotheses and as a topic for economic research in its own right. To encourage convergence between economics and evaluation, this article sketches the elements of an institutional economics of evaluation, considers the ongoing debate about the proper function of evaluation in society and presents cost benefit concepts and a supply demand framework to scrutinize the value and prospects of evaluation activities. Finally, it identifies performance measurement as a priority area for cooperation between evaluators and economists.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arrow, K. (1974) The Limits of Organization. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.
2.
Barbier, J. C. and B. Simonin (1997) ‘European Social Programmes: Can Evaluation of Implementation Increase the Appropriateness of the Findings?’, Evaluation3(4): 391–407.
3.
Buchanan, J. (1975) ‘A Contractarian Paradigm for Applying Economic Theory’, American Economic Review65: 225–230.
4.
Chandler, A. (1977) The Visible Man: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University Press.
5.
Chelimsky, E. (ed.) (1985) Program Evaluation: Patterns and Directions. Washington, DC: American Society for Public Administration.
6.
Chelimsky, E. (1997) ‘The Coming Transformations in Evaluation’, in E. Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish (eds) Evaluation for the 21st Century. London: Sage Publications.
7.
Chelimsky, E. and W. R. Shadish (eds) (1997) Evaluation for the 21st Century. London: Sage Publications.
8.
Chibber, A. (1998) ‘Institutions, Policies, and Development Outcomes’, in Evaluation and Development: The Institutional Dimension. Rutgers: Transaction Publishers.
9.
Coase, R. H. (1960) ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics3: 1–44.
10.
Fetterman, D. (1997) ‘Empowerment Evaluation and Accreditation in Higher Education’, in E. Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish (eds) Evaluation for the 21st Century. London: Sage Publications.
11.
Furubotn, E. G. and R. Richter (1991) ‘The New Institutional Economics: An Assessment’, The New Institutional Economics. Tubingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
12.
Hatry, H. (1997) Where the Rubber Meets the Road: Performance Measurement for State and Local Public Agencies, New Directions for Evaluation: Using Performance Measurement to Improve Public and Non-Profit Programs, No. 75. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Havens, H. S. (1990) The Evolution of the General Accounting Office: From Voucher Audits to Program Evaluations. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
14.
IUCN and the World Bank (1997) Large Dams: Learning from the Past, Looking at the Future. Washington, DC: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: The World Bank Group.
15.
Jayarajah, C. , W. Branson and B. Sen (1996) Social Dimensions of Adjustment, World Bank Experience, 1980–93. Washington, DC: The World Bank, Operations Evaluation Department.
16.
Mankiw, N. G. (1998) Principles of Economics. Orlando, FL: The Dryden Press, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, College Publishers.
17.
Mayne, J. and E. Zapico-Goni (eds) (1997) Monitoring Performance in the Public Sector: Future Directions from International Experience. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
18.
Mounier, E. (1995) ‘Comments on “Evaluating Public Services: A Case Study on Bangalore, India”’, in Evaluation and Development: Proceedings of the 1994 World Bank Conference. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
19.
Newcomer, K. (1997) Using Performance Measurement to Improve Public and Nonprofit Programs, New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 75. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Newman, J. , L. Rawlings and P. Gerteler (1994) ‘Using Randomized Control Designs in Evaluating Social Sector Programs in Developing Countries’, The World Bank Research Observer9(2).
21.
North, D. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Nugent, J. (1998) ‘Institutions, Markets, and Development Outcomes’, in Evaluation and Development: The Institutional Dimension. Rutgers: Transaction Publishers.
23.
Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Paul, S. (1995) ‘Evaluating Public Services: A Case Study on Bangalore, India’, in Evaluation and Development: Proceedings of the 1994 World Bank Conference. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
25.
Picciotto, R. (1994) ‘Visibility and Disappointment: The New Role of Development Evaluation’, in L. Rodwin and D. A. Schön (eds) Rethinking the Development Experience. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
26.
Pradhan, S. (1998) ‘Reinvigorating State Institutions’, in Evaluation and Development: The Institutional Dimension. Rutgers: Transaction Publishers.
27.
Sabel, C. F. (1994) ‘Learning by Monitoring: The Institutions of Economic Development’, in Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg (eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Scriven, M. (1991) Evaluation Thesaurus. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
29.
Stiglitz, J. (1998) ‘Evaluation as an Incentive Instrument’, in Evaluation and Development: The Institutional Dimension. Rutgers: Transaction Publishers.
30.
Vedung, E. (1997) Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
31.
Weiss, C. (1998) Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32.
Williamson, O. E. (1991) ‘Economic Institutions: Spontaneous and Intentional Governance’, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization7: 159–187.
