This section, which will appear in each issue of the journal, is open to contributions from members of the evaluation community worldwide. We particularly welcome news about evaluation societies, the events that they are undertaking and other international evaluation activities. Please send contributions c/o The Editorial Office.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Chen, H. (1990) Theory-driven Evaluations. London: Sage.
2.
Mason, R. and I.I. Mitroff (1981) Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions. Wiley:New York.
3.
Leeuw, Frans L. (1995) 'Performance Auditing, New Public Management and Performance Improvement: Questions and Challenges', paper, OECD-PUMA conference, Paris, June.
4.
Moukheibir, C. and M. Barzelay (1995) 'Performance Auditing: Concept and Controversies ', paper, OECD-PUMA symposium, Paris, June.
5.
Meyer, K. and K. O'Shaughnessy (1993) 'Organizational Design and the Performance Paradox', in R. Swedberg (ed.) Explorations in Economic Sociology. Russell Sage Foundation:New York.
6.
Shand, D. (1994) 'Performance Auditing and Performance Improvement in Government', paper presented at the European Evaluation Society, Den Haag, December 1-2.
