Reviews : Footprints: Strategies for Non-traditional Program Evaluation,Joy A. Frechtling (ed.). Arlington,VA: Directorate for Education and Human Resources,National Science Foundation,1995. 164 pp. Available at no charge
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online April, 1996
Reviews : Footprints: Strategies for Non-traditional Program Evaluation,Joy A. Frechtling (ed.). Arlington,VA: Directorate for Education and Human Resources,National Science Foundation,1995. 164 pp. Available at no charge
Boruch, R.F. and E. Boe (1995) 'The Use of Science and Mathematics Education Indicators and Studies: A Briefing', in Joy A. Frechtling (ed.) Footprints: Strategies for Non-traditional Program Evaluation, pp. 7-13. Arlington, VA: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation.
2.
Chelimsky, E. (1995) 'Commentary', in Joy A. Frechtling (ed.) Footprints: Strategies for Non-traditional Program Evaluation, pp. 127-8. Arlington, VA: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation .
3.
Chubin, D.E. (1995) 'Foreword', in Joy A. Frechtling (ed.) Footprints: Strategies for Non-traditional Program Evaluation, p. v. Arlington, VA: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation.
4.
Herman, J. L., ed. (1987) Program Evaluation Kit, 2nd edn. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
Johnson, S.T. (1995) 'Searching Near, Far, and Wide: A Plan for Evaluation' , in Joy A. Frechtling (ed.) Footprints: Strategies for Non-traditional Program Evaluation, pp. 15-23. Arlington, VA: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation.
6.
Kiresuk, T.J. (1994) 'Historical perspective', in T. J. Kiresuk, A. Smith and J. E. Cardillo (eds) Goal Attainment Scaling: Applications, Theory and Measurement, pp. 135-60. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Scriven, M. (1995) 'Overview', in Joy A. Frechtling (ed.) Footprints: Strategies for Non-traditional Program Evaluation, pp. 131-8. Arlington, VA: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation .
8.
Sharp, C.A. (1994) 'What Is Appropriate Evaluation? Ethics and Standards in Evaluation', Evaluation News & Comment (Australasian Evaluation Society) 3(2): 34-41.
9.
Sharp, C.A., B.L. Roffey and N.R. Lewis (1993) 'Appropriateness in Audit and Evaluation: "It all depends, Minister!"', Accounting, Finance and Management Research Paper 3/93, School of Commerce, Flinders University of South Australia .
10.
Stake, R.E. (1995) 'The Virtual Reality of Systematic Effects of NSF Programming on Education: Its Profession, Practice, Research and Institutions' , in Joy A. Frechtling (ed.) Footprints: Strategies for Non-traditional Program Evaluation, pp. 107-25. Arlington, VA: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation.
11.
Webb, N.L. (1995) 'Communicating the Value of the National Science Foundation's Contributions to Research and Innovative Techmcal Applications for Mathematics and Science Education', in Joy A. Frechtling (ed.) Footprints: Strategies for Non-traditional Program Evaluation, pp. 53-74. Arlington, VA: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation .
12.
Webb, E.T., D.T. Campbell, L. Schwartz, L. Sechrest and J.B. Grove (1981) Nonreactive Measures in the Social Sciences, 2nd edn. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
13.
Yin, R.K. (1995) 'New Methods for Evaluating Programs in NSF's Division of Research, Evaluation and Dissemination', in Joy A. Frechtling (ed.) Footprints: Strategies for Non-traditional Program Evaluation, pp. 25-36. Arlington, VA: Directorate for Education and Human Resources, National Science Foundation .