The Debates, Notes and Queries section provides an opportunity for evaluation-related issues to be debated as well as for more general interchange. Debates can take the form of sustained arguments by the advocates of different approaches or of briefer thoughts or notes. Contributors may also wish to comment and raise questions about material that has previously appeared in the journal or simply use the section to draw readers' attention to relevant issues, ongoing research, evaluation activities and other events.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, P. (1990) The Ethnographic Imagination. London: Routledge.
2.
Becker, H.S. (1967) 'Whose Side Are We On?', Social Problems14: 239-48.
3.
Becker, H.S. (1971) Sociological Work. London: Allen Lane.
4.
Blumer, H. (1969) Symbolic Interactionism. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
Brown, R.H. (1989) A Poetic for Sociology. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
6.
Guba, E. and Y. Lincoln (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Hammersley, M. (1992) What's Wrong With Ethnography? London: Routledge.
8.
McNiff, J. (1988) Action Research: Principles and Practice. London: Macmillan.
9.
Stem, E. (1995) 'Editorial', Evaluation1: 5-9.
10.
VanderPlaat, M. (1995) 'Beyond Technique: Issues in Evaluating for Empowerment' , Evaluation1: 81-96.
11.
Van Maanen, J. (1988) Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
